CBS altered Harris interview

[mspart]

https://nypost.com/2025/02/05/media/cbs-releases-unedited-video-of-60-minutes-interview-with-kamala-harris/

Trump-appointed FCC chair Brendan Carr got the full transcript and video on Monday after a tug-of-war with the Tiffany Network, which has defended the editing as a standard practice for “time, space or clarity.”

But a CBS source told The Post on Wednesday that the “60 Minutes” edit did Harris “a lot of favors and makes her seem more succinct.”

In a question from “60 Minutes” correspondent Bill Whitaker about what the US could do to stop the war from spinning out of control, Harris provides a rambling, 140-word answer, according to the full transcript. 

“Well, let’s start with October 7th. Because obviously, what we do now must be in the context of what has happened. And as I reflect on a year ago, and that 1,200 people were massacred, young people at a festival, at a music festival, 250 hostages were taken, including Americans, women were brutally raped,” Harris began.

“And as I said then, I maintain Israel has a right to defend itself. We would. And how it does so matters. And as we fast forward into what we have seen in the ensuing weeks and months, far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed. And we know that, and I think most agree, this war has to end. And that has to be our number one imperative, and that has been our number one imperative. How can we get this war to end?”

The version that was broadcast showed a succinct, 56-word reply.

“Well, let’s start with October 7th. Twelve hundred people were massacred, 250 hostages were taken, including Americans. Women were brutally raped. And as I said then, I maintain Israel has a right to defend itself. We would. And how it does so matters. Far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed. This war has to end,” Harris said.

This is just one example.   Read the article.   Is this election interference?   Is it an attempt to make the candidate sound better than she actually does?   Is it an attempt to trick people to think she has more intelligence than she actually has?   They are presenting this as an interview.   You don't get cuts in the interview if you are watching live.   You watch live.   And that is what the television audience were presented, an interview that seemingly was live but apparently was not.   This is the equivalent, in my mind, of an unpaid campaign contribution that should have been in the Harris documents as such.  

mspart

 

[Tripnsweep]

I don't know why anyone cares about this. I assume that any TV interview like this is edited because they have time constraints. If somebody likes to give meandering answers or has a speech or vocal tic, what are they going to do? They're going to edit for time. 

[Caveira]

36 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

I don't know why anyone cares about this. I assume that any TV interview like this is edited because they have time constraints. If somebody likes to give meandering answers or has a speech or vocal tic, what are they going to do? They're going to edit for time. 

Didn’t they put in different answers to different questions to make her look like less of a crappy candidate?   That’s not editing for time.  

Edited Friday at 07:24 PM by Caveira

[headshuck]

You’d be up in arms if it was Fox/Trump and it helped him win the election.

[Tripnsweep]

23 minutes ago, headshuck said:

You’d be up in arms if it was Fox/Trump and it helped him win the election.

Honestly I wouldn't care. We know Trump is a buffoon and you can't edit that away. 

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Honestly I wouldn't care. We know Trump is a buffoon and you can't edit that away. 

Answer my ? Above 

[Tripnsweep]

Just now, Caveira said:

Answer my ? Above 

That wasn't a question. That was a statement. I answered it anyway though. Apparently basic grammar still escapes you. 

[Scouts Honor]

luckily we edited biden away

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

Didn’t they put in different answers to different questions to make her look like less of a crappy candidate?   That’s not editing for time.

@Tripnsweep this question.   

[mspart]

1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

Honestly I wouldn't care. We know Trump is a buffoon and you can't edit that away. 

In other words, Trump is a Buffoon and it wouldn't help him anyway, but Harris is not a buffoon and it would help her.   Plus she is a woman and needs all the advantages she can get.  

That is what is being said by Trip.

One standard for all would be welcome. 

mspart

Edited Friday at 09:51 PM by mspart

[Caveira]

3 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

That wasn't a question. That was a statement. I answered it anyway though. Apparently basic grammar still escapes you. 

They changed her answers my man…… To questions she was asked.  You’re delusional at best.  

[mspart]

That's why the Feds are looking at this now.   CBS tried to cheat and it is right there.   Rather than reporting the news, they wanted Harris to look better than she did.   They edited the interview so that that was the case.  

mspart

[Lipdrag]

2 hours ago, Caveira said:

They changed her answers my man…… To questions she was asked. 

We found the CheapFake the KJP kept harping about.  We all knew it was lying about here somewhere.

Edited Saturday at 02:35 AM by Lipdrag

[Caveira]

Just now, Lipdrag said:

We found the CheapFake the KJP kept harping about.  We all knew it was lying about here somewhere.

Waiting for @Tripnsweep to answer.   He won’t because he knows he’s wrong. 

[Tripnsweep]

39 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Waiting for @Tripnsweep to answer.   He won’t because he knows he’s wrong. 

Honestly it's not a big deal. Trump refused to do an interview with them, and if he had, I'm sure they would have done the same thing. 

[headshuck]

Honestly it's not a big deal. Trump refused to do an interview with them, and if he had, I'm sure they would have done the same thing. 

Yeah, probably.

[Tripnsweep]

1 minute ago, headshuck said:

Yeah, probably.

 

 

 

 

Exactly what was she lying about? Him being under indictment for several crimes? Cheating contractors and business partners? Looting a charity for veterans and children? Running a fake university? Cheating on multiple wives? 

There isn't much about Trump that there's no information on. Except maybe his taxes

[headshuck]

Who cares about that stuff. You said they’d manufacture the same positive fake interview with him to fool the American people.

[Caveira]

20 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Honestly it's not a big deal. Trump refused to do an interview with them, and if he had, I'm sure they would have done the same thing. 

You still haven’t answered the question.  Leading me to believe you know I’m right and you are just deflecting.   I’ve asked 3+ times now. 

[RockLobster]

9 hours ago, Caveira said:

Didn’t they put in different answers to different questions to make her look like less of a crappy candidate?   That’s not editing for time.  

What - you can't read?

Read it yourself and then report your answers to us if you want to make a point with substance.

[Tripnsweep]

7 hours ago, Caveira said:

You still haven’t answered the question.  Leading me to believe you know I’m right and you are just deflecting.   I’ve asked 3+ times now. 

The more I read it doesn't look like anything that hasn't been done before. I assume that any kind of interview like this on a program like this is edited for length. A while back a friend of mine had a segment on TV where he was interviewed. He told me they took up 3 hours asking questions and when it finally aired? Less than 3 minutes. Maybe he should sue the network? 

[1032004]

“Investigating for election interference” when she lost seems like a waste of taxpayer dollars IMO, DOGE should nip this in the bud.  CBS was already humiliated enough when it went viral that should prevent them from doing it again 

[Caveira]

5 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

The more I read it doesn't look like anything that hasn't been done before. I assume that any kind of interview like this on a program like this is edited for length. A while back a friend of mine had a segment on TV where he was interviewed. He told me they took up 3 hours asking questions and when it finally aired? Less than 3 minutes. Maybe he should sue the network? 

 

[Tripnsweep]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

 

Because a tweet from an apartheid loving pseudo president means something? 

[Caveira]

43 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Because a tweet from an apartheid loving pseudo president means something? 

That blue circle with the white triangle pointing to the right.  That indicates that this is an imbedded video in what adults call a tweet.  
 

A tweet with an embedded video is like a tiny note with a movie inside. You don’t have to go anywhere else—it just plays right there!