How many genders?

[Gene Mills Fan]

As long as the guy breaking the law gets fined, it sounds good to me.   Where as if we make it OK the poor women that have to clean pee seat or put it back down are being victimized. and think of how long  their lines will be if this happens.

Awesome. Use your imagination and tell me how we hold people accountable for going into the 'wrong' bathroom? 

 

I already did but your bias and lack of reading comprehension is on display!

Edited December 11, 2025 by Gene Mills Fan

[Offthemat]

6 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

TPTPTPTPT,

Quit being such a pedo. .

And with that I take the 'W' on behalf of reason and sanity and bow out. You all can keep your bigoted and hateful opinions because its obvious that all you really want to do anyway. Good luck in hell, Bring water. Stay hydrated. 

BTW, my side will win this argument. We always do. Policies will change. People will be accepted for who they are. You can continue to cower in your armchair. Desperately typing into the void because this is the only place anyone will tolerate you and your hate. 

Bye

[mspart]

Rapes in girls bathrooms in Louden County happened at least a few times to a few girls.   Why is that acceptable?

Rapes in women's prisons happen by male inmates posing as women.   It does happen.   Why is that acceptable?

mspart

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

You really hope this is true. But I have a feeling you don’t believe it. And are terrified that your ideals are being proven to be wrong day after day. 

Again, you’re ignorant. And lazy. Not surprised at either. 

Again you’re ignorant and lazy.
You don’t want to admit you’re wrong which, I feel, you think is the only way to be proven wrong is to admit it. Because being wrong is not a great feeling. It doesn’t feel as bad if you’re actually trying to be right and you had some bad info due to no fault of your own. But you’ve doubled down on your ignorance and bigotry so you’re less likely to investigate anything that might prove you to be wrong. Which you’ve done here TWICE by being too lazy and ignorant to search for the definitions of two words. Then proclaiming my CORRECT explanations as wrong. 
 

You’re an idiot. And purposefully at this point. I hope that changes in the future. 

I’m not wrong. You are. 

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Yup. I call out bigots like you. That’s why you love these spaces. Cuz you don’t feel the need to give in to the shame of being called out as a bigot. 
 

If you read about it at all. You’ll learn that that is a trauma response. Digging your heels in when challenged is a response to trauma or lead poisoning. Yore defending your opinion and more so how you came by those opinions. The loved ones you trust that hold these opinions. The communities that support you that hold these opinions. And what it would mean to you and your safety and comfort if you lost those loved ones and/or communities if you changed your mind about these opinions. 
And you’re afraid of someone saying ‘I told you so’ because it’s a crappy feeling when someone belittles you for the no other reason than trusting someone with inaccurate information. 
 

I’m sorry you have a hard time with any challenge to your ideas. But give it a try and it gets easier. 

The person who hates being challenged the most on here is you.  It’s the reason you write a book in response to people that own you.  You TRY to sound smart while just completing your regular circle jerk. It’s ok though, the world needs idiots like you. 

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Yup. I call out bigots like you. That’s why you love these spaces. Cuz you don’t feel the need to give in to the shame of being called out as a bigot. 
 

If you read about it at all. You’ll learn that that is a trauma response. Digging your heels in when challenged is a response to trauma or lead poisoning. Yore defending your opinion and more so how you came by those opinions. The loved ones you trust that hold these opinions. The communities that support you that hold these opinions. And what it would mean to you and your safety and comfort if you lost those loved ones and/or communities if you changed your mind about these opinions. 
And you’re afraid of someone saying ‘I told you so’ because it’s a crappy feeling when someone belittles you for the no other reason than trusting someone with inaccurate information. 
 

I’m sorry you have a hard time with any challenge to your ideas. But give it a try and it gets easier. 

Male and female.  Two sexes   Science says so. 

[red viking]

41 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Liberals are great.  
 

a super small % of illegal voting happens so I don’t need voter id

not a huge % of overall rapes occur in women’s restrooms so  whatever.  

Point is that u don't see the forest through the trees. The hypocritical wingers get their panties in a bundle over possible trans sexual assault in women's restrooms and then minimize the OVERALL sexual assault problem in our society, almost all of which (90 to 99.9%) are being committed by cis males. Including our pedo president 

[red viking]

16 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Male and female.  Two sexes   Science says so. 

Science is the last thing an idiot like you should try to discuss. 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

Science is the last thing an idiot like you should try to discuss. 

Compared to you I’m Einstein 

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, red viking said:

Point is that u don't see the forest through the trees. The hypocritical wingers get their panties in a bundle over possible trans sexual assault in women's restrooms and then minimize the OVERALL sexual assault problem in our society, almost all of which (90 to 99.9%) are being committed by cis males. Including our pedo president 

You don’t see reality.  Women don’t want men pretending to be women peeing or taking dumps with them or just being in the bathroom in general.  

[JimmySpeaks]

19 minutes ago, red viking said:

Point is that u don't see the forest through the trees. The hypocritical wingers get their panties in a bundle over possible trans sexual assault in women's restrooms and then minimize the OVERALL sexual assault problem in our society, almost all of which (90 to 99.9%) are being committed by cis males. Including our pedo president 

Kinda like the wokester libtardos do with guns huh?  Almost all in the inner cities but all they talk about is the few retimes it’s not.  Forest thru the trees 

[El Luchador]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Science is the last thing an idiot like you should try to discuss. 

More arrogance. leftist think they are the only ones that are smart, yeah we know.

Edited December 11, 2025 by El Luchador

[El Luchador]

 

 

[El Luchador]

8 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

 

 

The lady larper assaulted this mans daughter and the school tried to cover it up. He then did it again at another school. The libs who control education are truly sick people. How stupid do you have to be to think like this.

[red viking]

20 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

More arrogance. leftist think they are the only ones that are smart, yeah we know.

Well, all you have to do is listen to the actual scientists that have dedicated their career to the subject you are interested in, instead of whack job youtubers. It isn't complicated. 

[El Luchador]

24 minutes ago, red viking said:

Well, all you have to do is listen to the actual scientists that have dedicated their career to the subject you are interested in, instead of whack job youtubers. It isn't complicated. 

You mean leftist scientists who benefit from government funding? Just those guys right not the ones that I also listen to. I actually went to college and studied industry and the environment and let me tell you it was a very different outlook by the professionals back then.

[Caveira]

Did his doctor or therapist tell him he cannot become a mother?  And he should shave his 5 o’clock shadow 

 

 

 

[ThreePointTakedown]

Gene:

I do think there are better more positive things to spend this money on.  Because that's a waste of my tax dollars. I should be advocating for the government to change 100% of existing structures for .03% of the public? NO, I would only stand up if .03% is making things unfair for 50% of the public(FEMALES). 

Could my idea, if enacted entirely and money notwithstanding, could this help to mitigate the your concern with people being comfortable going to the bathroom in public? 

 

Because I think it will. And you pivoting to 'this will cost too much' is your way of dismissing my idea, but also subtly admitting that it could work to quell much of the 'danger' you think occurs in the public bathrooms today.

 

Disagree. How is it a waste if it keeps people safe? You want people to be safe right? If not, why are you so concerned with this issue? 

 

You are suggesting that 99.97% of people are in danger. This suggestion would make safer 100% of people. That includes those people included in the 99.97% that would be violent to all other persons. I think its a great use of resources. But then you wouldn't have a boogie man. 

 

*Please, make the case that trans people make cis people unsafe by using the bathroom of their(trans people) choosing? BTW, if you use the phrases; 'I think' or 'some say' or 'I've seen' or 'common sense' you are appealing to anecdotal or emotional evidence and you have no logical reason to believe that your conclusion pertains to the whole population. 

 

Cav:

Liberals are great.  Agreed. We have sympathy and empathy for people. 
 

a super small % of illegal voting happens so I don’t need voter id Solution in search of a problem. But the solution will help your side win and you know it. Do you care that more voters will be disenfranchised(lose interest or ability to easily vote) than illegal votes will be eliminated? If you answer 'No' then you don't care about fixing it you care about punishing your perceived enemies. That's no patriotic. 

not a huge % of overall rapes occur in women’s restrooms so  whatever.  YES. That is the whole point. You will only accept a solution if it fixes 100% of the issue, in your opinion. But you will not entertain any suggestions from liberals that would fix it. That means you don't really care. If the problem is fixed you lose your scapegoat that allows you to foist your fear upon. You're pretty sure you won't be effected so the ends justify the means. 

You know this is rationalization of a losing argument. You don't have a point so you deflect. You don't care how many conservatives SA people or boast about being so rich they can grab women by the P. The crap between your ears is keeping you from understanding just how dangerous your opinions are. You will happily vilify a scapegoat community that has little to no power to push back. Ignore all the facts that prove you wrong. And double down on your ignorance to keep you safe as you actively put others in harms way. 

Gene:

Awesome. Use your imagination and tell me how we hold people accountable for going into the 'wrong' bathroom? 

 

I already did but your bias and lack of reading comprehension is on display!

What is the mechanism by which we find out if someone is/was not supposed to be in a certain bathroom? A fine doesn't identify a person. How does someone get identified as someone that needs to be fined? Give an exhaustive list of things we do to identify these people. 

 

MS:

Rapes in girls bathrooms in Louden County happened at least a few times to a few girls.   Why is that acceptable? Its not. I'm sorry you feel that torturing <3% of people because you don't understand them or think its icky, is acceptable to you. But that is what you are suggesting. People, all people, should not have to change out in the open in bathrooms/locker rooms at all. Ever! I'm on board. Let's pass a bill that retrofits ALL public school locker rooms and bathrooms so that the students feel safe amongst cis and trans gender people. And all public bathrooms in parks and on public property. Now, if you have any issue with that, then trans people are not really your problem. 

Rapes in women's prisons happen by male inmates posing as women.   It does happen.   Why is that acceptable?

So your problem, I feel, is that bad people are going to take advantage of any situation they can to get what they want. If that is the case, then yes I agree. But again, if you feel the solution is to torture <3% of the population, whose rate of committing SA is much lower than the cis population, because bad people do bad things, then trans people are not your problem. 

Jimmy:

I’m not wrong. You are.

Citing case law of Rubber vs Glue. Dang, that was diabolical. Well played. 

 

The person who hates being challenged the most on here is you.  It’s the reason you write a book in response to people that own you.  You TRY to sound smart while just completing your regular circle jerk. It’s ok though, the world needs idiots like you. 

Your idea of challenging is to straw man an opinion. Be dishonest. Call names. Weaponize your ignorance. And just be a d0uche b4g. Is this how you have conversations in person. Do you ever have a conversation, actual talking conversation, with anyone on a topic you don't already agree on? I would guess, no. Because its hard to imagine you being such an a$$ in real life and still have friends that tolerate you. 

I interpret each of your accusations as a confession. Thanks for playing. 

 

Male and female.  Two sexes   Science says so. 

I'd ask you to cite evidence of that. But you'll say you already did. Talk about jerking in a circle. Which you didn't. Because there is no conclusive evidence to come to that conclusion. Not that you know that because you have never looked. Because actually looking would expose you to evidence contrary to your belief. You're an idiot. 

 

Red:

Science is the last thing an idiot like you should try to discuss. 

No notes!

Jimmy:

Compared to you I’m Einstein 

I do recall the smartest person in a room usually has to declare it as loud as possible. 

 

Cav:

You don’t see reality.  Women don’t want men pretending to be women peeing or taking dumps with them or just being in the bathroom in general.  

I don't necessarily disagree with you. Where are you getting your information from? Make each toilet into its own room with a locking door. Fixed. 

 

Lucha:

More arrogance. leftist think they are the only ones that are smart, yeah we know.

Not much evidence to the contrary so far. Nothing cited so far, from the conservative side, has been scientific or data driven. Its all been 'trust me bruh' or 'common sense' or '99.9% agree with me'. If your side had respectable studies to support your position you'd be able to produce them. But you can't. That should tell you a lot about your position. But it doesn't seem like you're in the right emotional state to grapple with that topic. If you want to provide legit evidence, not twitter accounts, that support your point it would go along way to bolster the 'smart' comment. 

 

You mean leftist scientists who benefit from government funding? Just those guys right not the ones that I also listen to. I actually went to college and studied industry and the environment and let me tell you it was a very different outlook by the professionals back then.

You know you have to say that about conservative scientists too, right? Which means, under your view, no science can be trusted. Do you go to the doctor? Do you get vaccines? Do you trust weather forecasts? You shouldn't if you truly believe that. I very much doubt you'd put your health at risk for your political ideology. So be for real. You have no idea how to determine if a study is legit. Its ok. Its a tough hill to climb. The language can be hard to decipher. But that you don't understand it doesn't make it untrue or legit. 

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

YES. That is the whole point. You will only accept a solution if it fixes 100% of the issue, in your opinion.

The real issue is.  Real women don’t want wangs in their bathroom.   And.  And.  And.  They don’t want violence.  You cannot fix the idea that real women don’t want men pizzing and dumping next to them.   

[Gene Mills Fan]

Posted 8 minutes ago

 

Gene:

I do think there are better more positive things to spend this money on.  Because that's a waste of my tax dollars. I should be advocating for the government to change 100% of existing structures for .03% of the public? NO, I would only stand up if .03% is making things unfair for 50% of the public(FEMALES). 

Could my idea, if enacted entirely and money notwithstanding, could this help to mitigate the your concern with people being comfortable going to the bathroom in public? 

 

Because I think it will. And you pivoting to 'this will cost too much' is your way of dismissing my idea, but also subtly admitting that it could work to quell much of the 'danger' you think occurs in the public bathrooms today.

 

Disagree. How is it a waste if it keeps people safe? You want people to be safe right? If not, why are you so concerned with this issue? 

 

You are suggesting that 99.97% of people are in danger. This suggestion would make safer 100% of people. That includes those people included in the 99.97% that would be violent to all other persons. I think its a great use of resources. But then you wouldn't have a boogie man. 

 

*Please, make the case that trans people make cis people unsafe by using the bathroom of their(trans people) choosing? BTW, if you use the phrases; 'I think' or 'some say' or 'I've seen' or 'common sense' you are appealing to anecdotal or emotional evidence and you have no logical reason to believe that your conclusion pertains to the whole population. 

Edited December 12, 2025 by Gene Mills Fan

[Gene Mills Fan]

Gene:

Awesome. Use your imagination and tell me how we hold people accountable for going into the 'wrong' bathroom? 

 

lready did but your bias and lack of reading comprehension is on display!

What is the mechanism by which we find out if someone is/was not supposed to be in a certain bathroom? A fine doesn't identify a person. How does someone get identified as someone that needs to be fined? Give an exhaustive list of things we do to identify these people. 

 

This is not what you asked.  Again comprehension problem similar to understanding answers.   if there is a dispute or accusation, only then, a hearing would take place and facts would be asked for and evaluated. 

 

[ThreePointTakedown]

Cav.

The real issue is.  Real women don’t want wangs in their bathroom.   And.  And.  And.  They don’t want violence.  You cannot fix the idea that real women don’t want men pizzing and dumping next to them.

Individual rooms with toilets, solves all the problems that you are concerned with. Can you be a big enough person to admit it? 

 

Gene:

Gene:

Awesome. Use your imagination and tell me how we hold people accountable for going into the 'wrong' bathroom? 

 

lready did but your bias and lack of reading comprehension is on display!

What is the mechanism by which we find out if someone is/was not supposed to be in a certain bathroom? A fine doesn't identify a person. How does someone get identified as someone that needs to be fined? Give an exhaustive list of things we do to identify these people. 

 

This is not what you asked.  Again comprehension problem similar to understanding answers.   if there is a dispute or accusation, only then, a hearing would take place and facts would be asked for and evaluated. 

Those are two ends of the same question. You want someone fined if they go into the wrong bathroom in a public place. There are no laws for that. Therefore, there is no way to fine a person. So your 'fine them' solution is not a solution. My question was asking how we decide who to give a fine to. Which seemed pretty obvious. Speaking of comprehension. Is there a reason you didn't just answer the highlighted question anyway? Do you have an idea of how to figure out who should and shouldn't be in the 'correct' bathroom? You typed out a bunch of words to tell me you weren't going to answer the question. Enough words to just have answered it without me putting you on blast. 

So here is your opportunity... 

[JimmySpeaks]

It’s absolutely sickening that people are ok with dudes in the same public restrooms with underage girls.   Nothing that any of the wokester pedos on here have said proves otherwise.  

[Caveira]

28 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Individual rooms with toilets, solves all the problems that you are concerned with. Can you be a big enough person to admit it? 

It certainly does not.   Your silly.  They don’t want them in their bathroom.  What is so hard to understand that women do not want to see this guy or men in their restroom…. Or In their locker room….  Or in the same sport with them.   Period.

 

 

Edited December 12, 2025 by Caveira

[mspart]

Individual lavs for one person only would solve a problem, but how do you do that in a mass space?   Women already complain of the long lines to get into the loo as it is.   

mspart