Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Crypto?   Its imaginary money.   Now one could say the same about our currency.   But at least there is something tangible with coins and bills.   Not a fan, but if someone wants to invest in it, more power to them.   Of course I as wrong about facebook, no way could it be valued that high, they have no holdings of note, no property, produce nothing etc etc.   I was wrong there for sure. 

mspart

Posted
44 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

I would imagine there regulation in this sector going forward, given how much crypto money went into this election cycle (successfully).  RIP to Sherrod Brown's Senate career.

Somehow typing on my phone autocorrected here:  "I would imagine there will be very little, if any, regulation..."

Posted
1 minute ago, VakAttack said:

Somehow typing on my phone autocorrected here:  "I would imagine there will be very little, if any, regulation..."

It can go one of two ways.

Gensler took the position that the existing regulations were sufficient. But when real projects tried to comply they were refused or charged with violations. Some of them have taken to the courts to settle this (and have had some wins, hence spot bitcoin ETFs). 

In the process, some incumbents in the crypto industry have asked for crypto-specific regulation. Maybe they will finally get it with the new SEC chair.

But writing those regulations will be a lot of work and that is very hard to do. So maybe they won't get new regs, just less enforcement of the old regs.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
Just now, Wrestleknownothing said:

It can go one of two ways.

Gensler took the position that the existing regulations were sufficient. But when real projects tried to comply they were refused or charged with violations. Some of them have taken to the courts to settle this (and have had some wins, hence spot bitcoin ETFs). 

In the process, some incumbents in the crypto industry have asked for crypto-specific regulation. Maybe they will finally get it with the new SEC chair.

But writing those regulations will be a lot of work and that is very hard to do. So maybe they won't get new regs, just less enforcement of the old regs.

Well, with the death of Chevron doctrine, I just think it ends up a non-starter.  The nature of crypto itself and the emerging technologies is beyond the grasp of the vast majority of our (very old) legislature, and thus the reactions required would be nimble, but the people responsible for said regulation will have neither the knowledge (because they're so old/technologically stupid) nor ability (loss of Chevron deference means that any sort of regulatory agency will have to go thru Congress to get regulations passed, at which point the regulatory needs will be well beyond the conceived of regulations).  The overturning of Chevron deference is truly one of the most consequential things coming from the first Trump presidency that most people don't know or care enough to reckon with, nor will it be recognized if/when *I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* hits the fan thanks to the overturning.

  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

A freakin men

Back in the day before duct tape I did great things with baling wire.  

Edited by ionel

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...