Let’s Take the Republican Policy Challenge

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

Quote

If you take Trump’s words seriously (and we should take every presidential candidate’s words seriously), his proposed policies mean more inflation, worse debt, greater international instability, incompetent or corrupt appointees, disruptive mass deportations and the deployment of military force against domestic opponents.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/opinion/trump-policy-maga-republican.html

[ionel]

1 hour ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

If you take Trump’s words seriously (and we should take every presidential candidate’s words seriously), his proposed policies mean more inflation, worse debt, greater international instability, incompetent or corrupt appointees, disruptive mass deportations and the deployment of military force against domestic opponents.

How many of these happened in the first term?

[headshuck]

NYT never seems to understand that people don’t put much value on their opinion pieces anymore.

[Scouts Honor]

yes, lets try anyting 

[Paul158]

Let's not and say we did.

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

12 hours ago, ionel said:

How many of these happened in the first term?

You should try reading the article.

 

[ionel]

1 hour ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

You should try reading the article.

 

Its an opinion piece, its behind a paywall, was able to read the first sentence or two and an obvious false non factual hit piece.  

When reading a "news article" and the first sentence is bias and false I generally stop there. 

 

Edited October 18 by ionel

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 hour ago, ionel said:

Its an opinion piece, its behind a paywall, was able to read the first sentence or two and an obvious false non factual hit piece.  

When reading a "news article" and the first sentence is bias and false I generally stop there. 

 

And yet you felt free to opine on the contents without having read it.

Is the swami Ionel doing palm readings later today?

[Bigbrog]

He asked a question...he didn't opine on the contents without reading as he clearly pointed out he tried to read it, and it is behind a paywall.  And merely made a comment, which is fact, that it is an opinion piece.  

Better get back to sitting in your parent's basement, rocking back and forth in a room full of trump pictures and articles taped all over the walls, and mumbling anti-trump gibberish until mommy and daddy let you have internet time to post your craziness on here again.

[ionel]

2 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

And yet you felt free to opine on the contents without having read it.

Is the swami Ionel doing palm readings later today?

I did not opine to contents only first sentence able to read.  Lie much? 

Edited October 18 by ionel

[Scouts Honor]

i think wee wilie is at the wrong rally

[mspart]

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/opinion/trump-policy-maga-republican.html

Obviously in the opinion section of the NYT, which arguably is all opinion. 

Yep, wrong rally.

mspart

 

 

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

2 hours ago, mspart said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/opinion/trump-policy-maga-republican.html

Obviously in the opinion section of the NYT, which arguably is all opinion. 

Yep, wrong rally.

mspart

 

 

Who said it wasn't an opinion piece?

Maybe read first, comment after coffee?

[mspart]

It says opinion, no need to read further. 

mspart

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

5 hours ago, mspart said:

It says opinion, no need to read further. 

mspart

"Nothing to be learned from opinion pieces!"

lol

[Scouts Honor]

11 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

"Nothing to be learned from opinion pieces!"

lol

so you agree, something could be learned from a video on tik tok?