Jump to content

Islamic History


Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

any of our resident history buffs care to comment on this?

is it accurate?

 

I'll have to do some reading to check on the things I'm not sure about, but the most striking (and disingenuous) part of this is that almost every charge she levels at Islam's history can be equally, if not more so, levelled at the history of Christianity.

Systematic persecution of Jews? Check (and far more intense).

Religious conversion through military conquest? Check.

Oppression of women and minorities? Check.

Just on one topic I know she hilariously misrepresents, The Crusades.

In the 630s, the Byzantines surrendered Jerusalem to the Muslims after a short siege, ending 500 years of Roman control. The transfer was peaceful. For the first time in hundreds of years, Jews were permitted to return to live in Jerusalem in peace under Muslim control. Muslims and Jews largely lived in peace for the next several hundred years. Prior to the First Crusade, the Seljuk Turks parts of the Holy Land and made pilgrimage more difficult.  When the Christians launched the Crusades, persecution of Jews intensified in Europe and Jews in the Holy Land fought alongside Muslims to defend against the Crusaders. When the Christians took Jerusalem, they massacred the city's Muslim and Jews, including famously burning Jews alive in their synagogues. In contrast, when Saladin took the city back 100ish years later, he did not massacre the Christians. Instead, he allowed Christian pilgrims to continue to travel to Jerusalem and showed tolerance towards its Christian inhabitants. However, 50 years later, after 10 years of Christian control secured by a peace treaty, Jerusalem fell once again to a Muslim army and that army sacked the city and massacred 6000 Christians who were promised safe passage. Neither side is guiltless. It was a horrific cycle of violence.

I don't have all day to pick apart the rest, but safe to say, anybody who claims to reduce 1500 years of complex history into 15 minutes is full of shit, and I think you probably knew that, which is why you asked. Neither Christianity nor Islam have a pure history. Both histories are filled with violence and oppression alongside incredible advances in art, philosophy, technology, etc...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just an overall note because she describes Islam as being particularly anti-Semitic, anti-Semitism is a largely Christian, European phenomena. Obviously, there has been anti-Semitism by Muslims historically, but it pales by comparison in scale and intensity to the anti-Semitism of Christian Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

bernard, you know that literally, today, most muslim countries/sects want to annihilate all Jews and the state of Israel, right?

but go off about christians. 

ٔNot most of them. The difference between you or anyone else who does not live in a Muslim country -like Iran, where I live- and does not want annihilate the state of Israel with muslim people is not in your religion but in your media.

Edited by Undefeated
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Undefeated said:

ٔNot most of them. The difference between you or anyone else who does not live in a Muslim country -like Iran, where I live- and does not want annihilate the state of Israel with muslim people is not in your religion but in your media.

as we speak, Iran is literally trying to annihilate Israel .

TBD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

bernard, you know that literally, today, most muslim countries/sects want to annihilate all Jews and the state of Israel, right?

but go off about christians. 

That's not actually true. But yes, there is a Muslim anti-Semitism problem today that stems from the political situation forced on Palestine in the 1940s. They were essentially punished for Christian Europe's historic anti-semitism and as a result, anti-semitism has grown alongside the violence and land disputes. But it's mostly a modern phenomena and you asked about the video claiming to describe 1500 years of Muslim history and it was bunk. Sorry you didn't like the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

as we speak, Iran is literally trying to annihilate Israel .

And Israel is trying to annihilate Iran. 

At some point, if you actually care about this stopping, you have to acknowledge Israel's role in this disaster. They didn't accidentally double their control of the land since the partition, which itself was never agreed to by the people who already lived there.

Like any country, Israel has its own goals and desires. From its inception, the goal of Zionism is to re-establish Jewish control of the region as possible, including southern Lebanon and western Jordan. As they continue to work towards those goals, the region will increasingly heat up. You can't take land like this without backlash.

If the US occupied Ontario, nobody would pretend Canada doesn't have a right to oppose that occupation. That double standard only applies to Palestine.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

 They were essentially punished for Christian Europe's historic anti-semitism and as a result, anti-semitism has grown alongside the violence and land disputes. 

you are saying europe forced them to the middle east..

not that the isrealites wanted to go back to the promised land? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

And Israel is trying to annihilate Iran. 

 

 

if isreal wanted to... it would be done. If Iran had a nuke. isreal would be gone. which is why obama was a fool to let the nuclear deal go through.

just like all this genocide talk

they are the worst genociders in history

  • Stalling 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

And Israel is trying to annihilate Iran. 

At some point, if you actually care about this stopping, you have to acknowledge Israel's role in this disaster. They didn't accidentally double their control of the land since the partition, which itself was never agreed to by the people who already lived there.

Like any country, Israel has its own goals and desires. From its inception, the goal of Zionism is to re-establish Jewish control of the region as possible, including southern Lebanon and western Jordan. As they continue to work towards those goals, the region will increasingly heat up. You can't take land like this without backlash.

If the US occupied Ontario, nobody would pretend Canada doesn't have a right to oppose that occupation. That double standard only applies to Palestine.

 

you forget why isreal did this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

as we speak, Iran is literally trying to annihilate Israel .

They obviously aren't trying very hard or there would be a large scale war going on right now.

Do you ever get tired of sounding or looking stupid when you talk about things you have no clue about?

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

They obviously aren't trying very hard or there would be a large scale war going on right now.

Do you ever get tired of sounding or looking stupid when you talk about things you have no clue about?

Charlie Brown has moved on from Lucy and the football to Middle East history!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

I didn't miss it. Iran is much more capable than that. 

How?  They can't send a land army unless they march it through Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan.  Their Navy?!?  To attack from where, the Mediterranean Sea after going around the horn of Africa or the Suez canal??? Air Force - 50 year old F-14s and older F-4s with no refueling capability and would get eaten alive by Israel's air force.  So, lobbing missiles is all they can do now that their terrorist fanatics - the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas - have done things despicable enough to incite resolute retribution.  Iran's only hope is to do something despicable enough that it lures the USA in which then escalates above a little Jewish-Persian spat.  That is entirely possible but has nothing to do with Iran's warfighting capabilities.  At least until they get a nuke.

  • Pirate 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lipdrag said:

How?  They can't send a land army unless they march it through Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan.  Their Navy?!?  To attack from where, the Mediterranean Sea after going around the horn of Africa or the Suez canal??? Air Force - 50 year old F-14s and older F-4s with no refueling capability and would get eaten alive by Israel's air force.  So, lobbing missiles is all they can do now that their terrorist fanatics - the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas - have done things despicable enough to incite resolute retribution.  Iran's only hope is to do something despicable enough that it lures the USA in which then escalates above a little Jewish-Persian spat.  That is entirely possible but has nothing to do with Iran's warfighting capabilities.  At least until they get a nuke.

They do have a capable military. But if they wanted a large scale conflict now, it would have happened. I believe they have somewhere near 1 million active duty in their military with around half that number in the reserve forces. It isn't like Iran is some backwards place. The only thing keeping them back is knowing Israel would carpet bomb them to hell in retaliation for anything. Like if they tried to take out Tel Aviv or something. Iran doesn't want it, but to suggest this is the best they've got is absurd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

The only thing keeping them back is knowing Israel would carpet bomb them to hell in retaliation for anything.

Deterrrence.  Works every time it is tried.  The ability and will to make the other guy (and everyone the other guy loves) die for his cause is the best generator of peace ever known.

"They do have a capable military. But if they wanted a large scale conflict now, it would have happened. I believe they have somewhere near 1 million active duty in their military with around half that number in the reserve forces. It isn't like Iran is some backwards place. . . . Like if they tried to take out Tel Aviv or something. Iran doesn't want it, but to suggest this is the best they've got is absurd. "

Iran does have the will to take out Tel Aviv and every Jew on the planet.  They have stated this is their goal many times.  They don't have the capability or else they would have done it.  The alternative is that they are lying.  I respect Iran enough to believe that when they say they want something that it is the truth.  They simply do not have the capability to get what they want with their million man army and 1/2 million reserves so they use the H-tards (Houthi, Hezbollah, Hamas) to harass Israel and die for them.  When will the H-tards figure out they are being played?  I guess the money for the top H's is good enough for them to cause (and be solely responsible for) their kinsmen, kinswomen, kinsparents, and kinschildren (whom they hide behind) to die.

Edited by Lipdrag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...