Jump to content

The only thing missing at the DNC Convention is Rev. Jim Jones. Don't drink the Kool-Aid/


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 8/20/2024 at 2:21 PM, red viking said:

Who was required by law to get vaccinated? Who was convicted for not getting vaccinated? 

Expand  

All military had to get vaccinated or get removed or fired. Some of the healthiest young men and the least vunerable were forced to get vaccinated or be terminated.

Edited by Paul158
  • Bob 3
  • Brain 1
Posted

News flash: Employers can set their own rules as conditions of employment. Always have, always will, and should continue to be able to do that. Has very little to do with Democratic or Republican policies. It's really up to the employer.  

Posted
  On 8/20/2024 at 2:40 PM, red viking said:

News flash: Employers can set their own rules as conditions of employment. Always have, always will, and should continue to be able to do that. Has very little to do with Democratic or Republican policies. It's really up to the employer.  

Expand  

By law the federal Government said they had to get the shot. It was a law.

  • Bob 1
Posted
  On 8/20/2024 at 2:40 PM, red viking said:

News flash: Employers can set their own rules as conditions of employment. Always have, always will, and should continue to be able to do that. Has very little to do with Democratic or Republican policies. It's really up to the employer.  

Expand  

So could an employer require all men to get a vasectomy or require all women carry their baby to term? 

.

Posted
  On 8/20/2024 at 2:48 PM, ionel said:

So could an employer require all men to get a vasectomy or require all women carry their baby to term? 

Expand  

I think they could, if it had something to do with the job. Depends upon the situation though. I can't think of any jobs where a vasectomy or being required to carry a baby to term would improve job performance. Could they do it just for the heck of it, because they "feel like it?" Probably not. 

This is all very simple. I'm surprised that you're asking these questions. It demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the law. 

Posted
  On 8/20/2024 at 2:49 PM, red viking said:

Those were employment conditions for certain workers, as a condition of employment. Completely legit. 

Expand  

It was mandated by companies because it was mandated by the government.  Then, if you declined, you were denied unemployment.  It had no relevance to the job, was not a precondition to being hired, and as we now know, had only the potential to harm. 

Posted
  On 8/20/2024 at 3:04 PM, Offthemat said:

It was mandated by companies because it was mandated by the government.  Then, if you declined, you were denied unemployment.  It had no relevance to the job, was not a precondition to being hired, and as we now know, had only the potential to harm. 

Expand  

No relevance to the job? B.S. It was a public health concern. 

Posted

Irony. Mandating the vaccine therefore making the pharmaceutical companies highly profitable and now the democrats want to pretend like they care about controlling the pharmaceutical company's profits by "snatching their patents".

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...