Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, jajensen09 said:

Besides maybe 3 matchs. Every match was a 1 take down match

That is  incorrect

125 #4 Luke Lilledahl #6 Caleb SmithW DEC 4 - 2

133 #18 Braeden Davis#19 Jacob Van Dee L DEC 14 - 7

141 #2 Beau Bartlett #1 Brock HardyW DEC 8 - 7

149 #3 Shayne Van Ness#2 Ridge Lovett L MD 10 - 2 

157 #2 Tyler Kasak #7 Antrell Taylor W DEC 9 - 3

165 #1 Mitchell Mesenbrink #16 Bubba Wilson W TF5 20 - 3 5:44

174 #2 Levi Haines #4 Lenny Pinto W DEC 9 - 2

184 #2 Carter Starocci #12 Silas AllredW MD 11 - 2

197 #4 Josh Barr #24 Camden McDanelW TF5 19 - 4 6:43

285 #3 Greg Kerkvliet #79 Harley AndrewsW TF5 20 - 2 6:15

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
9 minutes ago, jajensen09 said:

Besides maybe 3 matchs. Every match was a 1 take down match

You sound like that guy in the casino who tells you how close he was to covering that spread 8 times in a row, and could you just lend him some money because, see, he has this system.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
Besides maybe 3 matchs. Every match was a 1 take down match

Are you suggesting that the matches at 165, 174, 184, 197 and 285 didn’t happen?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
9 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

The average life of a PortaJohn based on use.

  • Heavy Posting: You can expect the life cycle of a porta john on a wrestling forum to end after about ten years. The quality may be falling off, and the posting may be so deranged that it’s barely stable at this point. Since they can no longer post coherently a porta john will begin the process of recycling it's data for use in other threads down the road.

I think your'e just getting full of sh..!

  • Poopy 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

I think your'e just getting full of sh..!

Wkn has a graph on how full.  💩 

.

Posted
13 hours ago, Le duke said:


Are you suggesting that the matches at 165, 174, 184, 197 and 285 didn’t happen?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

174 wasnt a blow out. Also note* all those weights you just mentioned has a guy or 2 from another team better than them at ncaas 

Posted

Ya know, I just wasn't picking up what @jajensen09 was putting down.

Sure, if you squint you can maybe see a way, but I just wasn't trusting my instincts. But I admit I was worried after PSU laid an egg at the Big Ten Tournament. So I ran the numbers.

Yep, now I see it.

I have no idea how the often underperforming Nittany Lie Ins are going to come from this far behind.

image.thumb.png.46086cb824a521359c4e3747972d74a9.png

  • Haha 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
1 hour ago, jajensen09 said:

174 wasnt a blow out. Also note* all those weights you just mentioned has a guy or 2 from another team better than them at ncaas 

9-2 is a pretty dominant win.  1 point from a major.

Posted
2 minutes ago, jajensen09 said:

And he won't beat hamiti or otoole

And what the hell does that have to do with anything? Here, I’ll be a five year-old like you and say Pinto won’t beat them either. Take that

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...