Plasmodium Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 Just now, ionel said: Can we see the data going back 4.5M years to the Pliocene Climatic Optimum when it was 400ppm? And why was it so high? Were dinosaurs farting or burning coal? I’m sure you can if you look hard enough. That data perfectly fits your timeframe and now you want to task me with more work? Trolling 3.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 17 minutes ago, Plasmodium said: Which part - the age of the earth or the carbon dioxide output of the Industrial Revolution? I’m not falling for the premise that you can take data using two different methods and combine them in one linear chart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 3 minutes ago, Plasmodium said: I’m sure you can if you look hard enough. That data perfectly fits your timeframe and now you want to task me with more work? Trolling 3.3/10 what else you gonna do this evening? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasmodium Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 6 minutes ago, Offthemat said: I’m not falling for the premise that you can take data using two different methods and combine them in one linear chart. Both methods are accurate, so there it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 15 minutes ago, Plasmodium said: Both methods are accurate, so there it is. They are not the same. Even if they were, you’re talking the difference between .000008 and .000016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasmodium Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 9 minutes ago, Offthemat said: They are not the same. Even if they were, you’re talking the difference between .000008 and .000016. They are the same. They measure the same thing, so of course it is continuous. What are those numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 3 minutes ago, Plasmodium said: They are the same. They measure the same thing, so of course it is continuous. What are those numbers? The amount of co2 in the atmosphere that humans might be responsible for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasmodium Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 2 minutes ago, Offthemat said: The amount of co2 in the atmosphere that humans might be responsible for. The contribution from the Industrial Revolution isn’t > 140 ppm? That would be > 0.00014, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasmodium Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 (edited) At any rate, sea level is going up. Our children and grandchildren will see the tide roll right up what used to be 5th Avenue. Edited September 15 by Plasmodium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kollin Rath Bethlehem Catholic, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Missouri Projected Weight: 157
Gunner Andrick Point Pleasant, West Virginia Class of 2025 Committed to West Virginia Projected Weight: 149
Quinlan Morgan Mounds View, Minnesota Class of 2024 Committed to South Dakota State Projected Weight: 197, 285
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now