manatree Posted June 3 Posted June 3 10 minutes ago, ionel said: Maybe because sports lose money and there's only so much money to lose. The key to filling your bucket is not adding more holes.
ionel Posted June 3 Posted June 3 3 minutes ago, manatree said: The key to filling your bucket is not adding more holes. 1 .
Former158 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 10 hours ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: Isn't everyone on full scholarship or none now? And I think everyone at PSU has full? It seems hard to believe every psu back up is on a full ride
jajensen09 Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 On 6/2/2026 at 10:31 AM, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: They can't. Every single program loses money. Old way of thinking... Nebraska is going to be damn close to in the green. 1
ionel Posted June 4 Posted June 4 35 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: Old way of thinking... Nebraska is going to be damn close to in the green. How so? .
ScottishSteel Posted June 4 Posted June 4 8 hours ago, ionel said: How so? oooooooo I got this one . . . because of the culture 2 Irrationally proud former WPIAL wrestler No Scotland, No Party . . . Go Beavs
ScottishSteel Posted June 4 Posted June 4 15 hours ago, trojanhorse said: With seeing these numbers, it puzzles a bit as to why institutions like Texas, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, etc. do not have more sports as they have huge revenues generated from their football programs. USC and Oregon puzzle me the most being in the BIG 10 now. They would help bring more exposure on the west coast and hopefully strengthen the conference even more so than it already is. because additional sports is less money that the athletic department can reinvest back into football 1 Irrationally proud former WPIAL wrestler No Scotland, No Party . . . Go Beavs
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 11 hours ago, jajensen09 said: Old way of thinking... Nebraska is going to be damn close to in the green. In the green?
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 13 hours ago, Former158 said: It seems hard to believe every psu back up is on a full ride I may have mistakenly thought it was mandatory under the new structure; that is how it has been for football forever. However, Cael may have decided that he is going full scholarship only. Any PSU fans know anything about this? How many PSU backups do you think there are? (Also keep in mind the entire team supposedly gets $50,000 ish rev share per year in addition to any NIL)
Nak21 Posted June 4 Posted June 4 14 hours ago, Former158 said: It seems hard to believe every psu back up is on a full ride I don’t think they are. Things could’ve changed but rolling into the 30 roster limit it was said by Cael and the AD that they would likely be in the 22-24 scholarship ballpark, with the AD adding the caveat that if Cael needed something they’d get it for him, which I’d imagine meant one off an extra ship or 2 if needed in certain years. I’m sure many are getting some level of NIL and PSU is doing the revenue share thing too. It’s a lot more lucrative to be an Olympic sport/non-revenue sport college athlete today than it used to be.
ionel Posted June 4 Posted June 4 1 hour ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: In the green? Perhaps he was suggesting Mark is out and James is in? .
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 2 minutes ago, ionel said: Perhaps he was suggesting Mark is out and James is in? Good guess! I thought he was talking about golf!
ionel Posted June 4 Posted June 4 Just now, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: Good guess! I thought he was talking about golf! Maybe ... but the "in" vs "on." .
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 1 minute ago, ionel said: Maybe ... but the "in" vs "on." ah... true! But it is jajensen...
MPhillips Posted June 4 Posted June 4 1 hour ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: ah... true! But it is jajensen... This... 2 .
jajensen09 Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 5 hours ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: In the green? = a profit .. shouldn't be hard to figure out 2 hours ago, MPhillips said: This... And this... the biggest cry baby get off my lawn guy in here
jajensen09 Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 15 hours ago, ionel said: How so? Crunching #s from $$ brought in. Nebraska wrestling finishes with a profit not negative 1
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 3 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: = a profit .. shouldn't be hard to figure out And this... the biggest cry baby get off my lawn guy in here And if you understood "profit" or "in the black," you would know they have no chance to stay out of the red.There is absolutely no chance. IF PSU can't turn a profit, you think Nebraska can? And you leave Mphillips alone.
ionel Posted June 4 Posted June 4 9 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: Crunching #s from $$ brought in. Nebraska wrestling finishes with a profit not negative Every program brings in the same as the pay out correct? The money has to come from somewhere. But are you saying Nebraska so profitable that wrestling is helping to cover a women's sport? .
Gene Mills Fan Posted June 4 Posted June 4 16 hours ago, jajensen09 said: Old way of thinking... Nebraska is going to be damn close to in the green. New way of thinking... Go Big Green!! There's no place like 'in the green'! 1
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 18 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: Crunching #s from $$ brought in. Nebraska wrestling finishes with a profit not negative Where do you come up with your "$$ brought in." I'm curious, and it ought to be pretty humorous! Please share your numbers with us.
jajensen09 Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 47 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: And if you understood "profit" or "in the black," you would know they have no chance to stay out of the red.There is absolutely no chance. IF PSU can't turn a profit, you think Nebraska can? And you leave Mphillips alone. Look how much money psu spends compared to nebraska 1
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted June 4 Posted June 4 Just now, jajensen09 said: Look how much money psu spends compared to nebraska The Nits also bring in a lot more revenue... and still are "in the red." Please detail Nebraska's income. This should be interesting.
jajensen09 Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 50 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: And if you understood "profit" or "in the black," you would know they have no chance to stay out of the red.There is absolutely no chance. IF PSU can't turn a profit, you think Nebraska can? And you leave Mphillips alone. Psu -7$ Nebraska-3$ big difference
jajensen09 Posted June 4 Author Posted June 4 Just now, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: The Nits also bring in a lot more revenue... and still are "in the red." Please detail Nebraska's income. This should be interesting. They also are -4$ million more ! Big difference
Jackson Lininger Northern York, Pennsylvania Class of 2027 Committed to Slippery Rock Projected Weight: 149
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now