CULT

[ThreePointTakedown]

RECOGNIZE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CULTS

1. Isolating members and penalizing them for leaving, how many members of the house and senate that voted to impeach/remove 45, are still left. Where is MTG? 
2. Seeking inappropriate loyalty to their leaders, nominees of 'independent' positions in the executive branch refuse to answer, 'Yes' to the question: Did 45 lose the 2020 presidential election.
3. Dishonoring the family unit, 
4. Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability., the house and senate, both in control of R's refuse to reign in 47 on the war crimes they have committed and other constitutional breaches
5. No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry., what has happened to every single member of House or Senate that spoke out against 45/47. 
6. No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement., Tax docs, crypto schemes, free airplanes, huge Gov't settlements to themselves(47 and others) 
7. Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies, and persecutions., (cough cough) immigrants, Christian persecution, DEI, CRT. 
8. There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil., thoughts on Chaney, Romney, MTG, Masey, and Kinzinger. Whoops. 
9. Followers feel they can never be "good enough"., 
10. The group/leader is always right., argh
11. The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing "truth" or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible., how can y'all not see this yet?... Oh,... right... 

[red viking]

1 minute ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

RECOGNIZE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CULTS

1. Isolating members and penalizing them for leaving, how many members of the house and senate that voted to impeach/remove 45, are still left. Where is MTG? 
2. Seeking inappropriate loyalty to their leaders, nominees of 'independent' positions in the executive branch refuse to answer, 'Yes' to the question: Did 45 lose the 2020 presidential election.
3. Dishonoring the family unit, 
4. Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability., the house and senate, both in control of R's refuse to reign in 47 on the war crimes they have committed and other constitutional breaches
5. No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry., what has happened to every single member of House or Senate that spoke out against 45/47. 
6. No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement., Tax docs, crypto schemes, free airplanes, huge Gov't settlements to themselves(47 and others) 
7. Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies, and persecutions., (cough cough) immigrants, Christian persecution, DEI, CRT. 
8. There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil., thoughts on Chaney, Romney, MTG, Masey, and Kinzinger. Whoops. 
9. Followers feel they can never be "good enough"., 
10. The group/leader is always right., argh
11. The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing "truth" or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible., how can y'all not see this yet?... Oh,... right... 

How about trying to put somebody in prison simply for basically saying "get rid of the leader?" 

Edited April 29 by red viking

[Doublehalf]

Definitely a cult.

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

Looks like the three cultists in the first three posts here!

Edited April 29 by Interviewed_at_Weehawken

[Scouts Honor]

why are they so racist?

 

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

RECOGNIZE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CULTS

1. Isolating members and penalizing them for leaving,  sounds like cali or NY
2. Seeking inappropriate loyalty to their leaders,  youall aint black enough
3. Dishonoring the family unit, exactly what the left has done
4. Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability., 11han omar, tim walz
5. No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry., what happened to a rodeo clown
6. No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement., 11han
7. Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies, and persecutions., white supremacists are the worst!!
8. There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil., elon, trump, left and look what happened to them
9. Followers feel they can never be "good enough"., leftists are never happy
10. The group/leader is always right., talking points always come out
11. The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing "truth" or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible., obama? 

 

[El Luchador]

[El Luchador]

Only a cult member could believe a man can become a woman.

[red viking]

17 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

All those pedo scumbag cults in sleezebag Utah are pretty liberal, right? 

Edited April 29 by red viking

[red viking]

17 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Only a cult member could believe a man can become a woman.

What about if you just don't care what somebody calls him/herself? 

[El Luchador]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

All those pedo scumbag cults in sleezebag Utah are pretty liberal, right? 

I guess I'm not aware of them, but there are no shortages of sexually deviant people. 

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, red viking said:

What about if you just don't care what somebody calls him/herself? 

If you read his post.  He doesn’t care what they are called.   He is saying you’re in a cult IF you think a man can be a woman …. It’s the it’s  true part of the equation that makes it a cult 

[El Luchador]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

What about if you just don't care what somebody calls him/herself? 

As long as they don't attempt to make me take part in their lie, and try to groom children into their delusion.

[red viking]

Just now, Caveira said:

If you read his post.  He doesn’t care what they are called.   He is saying you’re in a cult IF you think a man can be a woman …. It’s the it’s  true part of the equation that makes it a cult 

that's pretty stupid if you think somebody is automatically in a cult simply because they think a man can be a woman, etc. Possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard, particularly when you look up ANY definition of a  cult. 

[mspart]

Google search - definition of a cult

AI

A cult is a social group, often defined by intense, unquestioning devotion to a person, idea, or object, which is marked by strict, authoritarian control, isolationism, and often manipulative techniques to exploit members. It typically involves unorthodox or extremist beliefs that differ from mainstream religious or social structures

Highlighting is not mine, it is the Google's.   To the point regarding believing a man can be a woman, i think that holds with the unquestioning devotion to an idea, which is marked by strict authoritarian control.   It isn't so much now, but there was a time a few years ago when Trans was the big thing, that this held true.   

mspart

[red viking]

7 minutes ago, mspart said:

....which is marked by strict authoritarian control.   It isn't so much now, but there was a time a few years ago when Trans was the big thing, that this held true.   

mspart

You may want to re-read this. This is a big stretch and ridiculous. You're also resorting to terms like "the big thing." There's zero association between "authoritarian control" and believing a man can be a woman. 

[mspart]

RV, they were trying to legalize the conception and they were going to enforce naysayers by the same.   Speech was being censored if it strayed beyond what was considered compliant.   That is authoritarian by any definition.  

mspart

[red viking]

1 minute ago, mspart said:

RV, they were trying to legalize the conception and they were going to enforce naysayers by the same.   Speech was being censored if it strayed beyond what was considered compliant.   That is authoritarian by any definition.  

mspart

It's not even remotely close to the level of censoring that the Trumptard admin is trying to implement. 

[Caveira]

17 minutes ago, red viking said:

It's not even remotely close to the level of censoring that the Trumptard admin is trying to implement. 

He’s talking about actual censorship that occurred.   Not made up censorship in your head in the future.  Also remember Covid censorship ?  Or the laptop?   Or the random other censorship that actually happened under biden

Edited April 29 by Caveira

[red viking]

9 minutes ago, Caveira said:

He’s talking about actual censorship that occurred.   Not made up censorship in your head in the future.  Also remember Covid censorship ?  Or the laptop?   Or the random other censorship that actually happened under biden

there was zero censorship via Biden. that's why you can't provide examples. trumptard is definitely trying to implement censorship by indicting somebody for merely saying "86 47." He also said he wanted to put people in jail for 1 year for burning the U.S. flag. 

[Caveira]

11 minutes ago, red viking said:

there was zero censorship via Biden. that's why you can't provide examples. trumptard is definitely trying to implement censorship by indicting somebody for merely saying "86 47." He also said he wanted to put people in jail for 1 year for burning the U.S. flag. 

Sure 

• COVID-19 Information:White House officials repeatedly pressured Meta (Facebook), Google (YouTube), and X (Twitter) to remove posts related to the "lab leak" theory, vaccine efficacy, and lockdowns. Mark Zuckerberg later expressed regret for complying with requests to censor humor and satire.
• Hunter Biden Laptop Story: Ahead of the 2020 election, the FBI warned platforms of a potential Russian "hack and leak" operation. This led platforms to suppress the New York Post story, which was later confirmed as authentic.
• The "Disinformation Governance Board": In 2022, the DHS announced a board to combat misinformation, which critics labeled an Orwellian "Ministry of Truth". Due to intense public backlash, the board was paused and eventually dissolved.
• Direct Tweet Removal:Internal "YouTube Files" and "Twitter Files" showed White House officials, such as Rob Flaherty, asking platforms why specific posts—including a tweet by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—had not been removed.

[Caveira]

23 minutes ago, red viking said:

there was zero censorship via Biden. that's why you can't provide examples. trumptard is definitely trying to implement censorship by indicting somebody for merely saying "86 47." He also said he wanted to put people in jail for 1 year for burning the U.S. flag. 

Also the 86 47 idea is going where.   To court.  If it’s a sham it will be tossed out.  
 

Biden era censorship didn’t go to court.  They just did it.  
 

Even you can see the difference there. 

[wrestlingguy]

16 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Sure 

 

• COVID-19 Information:White House officials repeatedly pressured Meta (Facebook), Google (YouTube), and X (Twitter) to remove posts related to the "lab leak" theory, vaccine efficacy, and lockdowns. Mark Zuckerberg later expressed regret for complying with requests to censor humor and satire.
• Hunter Biden Laptop Story: Ahead of the 2020 election, the FBI warned platforms of a potential Russian "hack and leak" operation. This led platforms to suppress the New York Post story, which was later confirmed as authentic.
• The "Disinformation Governance Board": In 2022, the DHS announced a board to combat misinformation, which critics labeled an Orwellian "Ministry of Truth". Due to intense public backlash, the board was paused and eventually dissolved.
• Direct Tweet Removal:Internal "YouTube Files" and "Twitter Files" showed White House officials, such as Rob Flaherty, asking platforms why specific posts—including a tweet by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—had not been removed.

You know he doesn't like receipts. He wants to believe his inner monlogue.

[red viking]

21 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Sure 

 

• COVID-19 Information:White House officials repeatedly pressured Meta (Facebook), Google (YouTube), and X (Twitter) to remove posts related to the "lab leak" theory, vaccine efficacy, and lockdowns. Mark Zuckerberg later expressed regret for complying with requests to censor humor and satire.
• Hunter Biden Laptop Story: Ahead of the 2020 election, the FBI warned platforms of a potential Russian "hack and leak" operation. This led platforms to suppress the New York Post story, which was later confirmed as authentic.
• The "Disinformation Governance Board": In 2022, the DHS announced a board to combat misinformation, which critics labeled an Orwellian "Ministry of Truth". Due to intense public backlash, the board was paused and eventually dissolved.
• Direct Tweet Removal:Internal "YouTube Files" and "Twitter Files" showed White House officials, such as Rob Flaherty, asking platforms why specific posts—including a tweet by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—had not been removed.

This is a complete lie. None of these are censorship. "Pressuring" pvt sector entities to remove things, which they are completely allowed to do is not even remotely close to what the Trumptard Pedo Admin is doing. He's actually trying to punish people directly for merely saying things

[Caveira]

Just now, red viking said:

This is a complete lie. None of these are censorship. "Pressuring" pvt sector entities to remove things, which they are completely allowed to do is not even remotely close to what the Trumptard Pedo Admin is doing. He's actually trying to punish people directly for merely saying things

Ok boss