All Activity

Please point out where I said conservatives don't engage in cancel culture...I merely would like to know, of the people you claimed were canceled, how conservatives "canceled" them?? You refused to answer. LOL about the age thing...your posts show your maturity or lack there of

great post with a ton of viable?'s wrestling while it is loved by its loyal fan base it is extremely small market as you pointed out bleachers are pretty empty even in nationals and WTTs- its similar to Jai alai / small market and most have no ideas on the rules not exactly a packed house for the above event

Google won't save your searches if you're using Incognito mode either - but DuckDuckGo takes it a step further. It doesn’t save anything - no searches, no cookies, nothing. Personally, I kinda like when apps save my searches. Makes them work better for me. The only one that’s ever annoyed the hell outta me was Instagram. Like, God forbid you click on one random pic - it’ll never let it go. One time I looked at a photo of a bodybuilder and after that, it was like nonstop - not just bodybuilders but every jacked-up, sketchy-looking dude on the planet.

Very true. I mean I eat pretty much as close as farm to table as possible. But we all know steak three times a day is not necessarily recommended. But to get back to the beginning point of this discussion, which was chemically manufactured sweetener vs natural raw sweetener, I will take natural raw every single time. (For me, that is where the ‘common sense’ comes into play) But the beauty of the human species is we are all different, and the beauty of this country is we can all make our own choices.

Of course they do... but the liberals aren't denying they engage in cancel culture- you are. Two sides of the same coin. And please don't ask me my age again, it's really creepy and especially from someone that supports the party with the guy in charge that was always hanging out with Epstein... I'm too old for you and MAGA, leave me be!

Off the top of my head I have Rocco Welsh, Ryan Jack, and Jackson Arrington. Who else?

Maybe this is already known but thought I'd mention that with most things there isn't necessarily a "good" or "bad" debate about a substance, but rather when does that substance become "bad"...how much of something is what causes something to become "bad". Nearly every substance known becomes "bad" at some point if too much of it is ingested...whether taken to much at once (aka water toxicity), or over a period of time (aka cigarettes).

Not at all accurate: 1) I specifically said I am not trying to convince you of anything, but merely talking at this point about doing the research subjectively. I will acknowledge you quoted more from the Mayo article than I originally realized, went back and looked and will correct that. 2) “Common sense”. Artificial, manufactured food vs natural raw whole food. I don’t know what you want me to provide that shows common sense. 3) I have listed more than “common sense” as for the basis of my opinion. I also listed years, decades actually, of taking the subject very very seriously and studying it as such, I don’t think I can go back and find the material I have studied over the last 30 some years to provide for you. I also stated personal experience. I’m not sure what you would like me to provide in that sense. I mean, I have a picture from kayaking last weekend I could post to show what kinds of effects my choices have had, but I don’t think we wanna go there.

This is literally the only excerpt from the Mayo Clinic article that you posted that I didn’t. Fruits and vegetables are better than products with artificial sweeteners? No way! The argument for artificial sweeteners is that they can be a good replacement for sugar. Notably, as I called out when linking the articles, most of the research that “associates” artificial sweeteners with negative outcomes, doesn’t compare it to sugar. When it is compared to sugar, it has actually often been found in multiple studies to provide positive outcomes.

Yes your assumption is correct. The parties have moved on.

Do the liberals celebrate when a conservative gets canceled?

The dumb wingers celebrate whenever ANY liberal-leaning show gets canceled.

That's my boys right there.

I use DuckDuckGo which doesn’t save your searches

So looks like your results were pretty much the same as mine? I wasn’t cherry picking, I was summarizing. I included some of the comments claiming they’re bad. In fact, some of the “other excerpts” from the Mayo Clinic article you posted and claimed I cherry-picked, I had already posted… So, it looks like you’re the one trying to confirm your bias. You keep saying it’s “common sense” that they’re bad, I’m literally saying I’m undecided and am willing to change my mind, and have asked you multiple times to provide something to back up your opinion and you have not. These articles certainly do not, they call out some of the reasons why people think they’re bad, but also call out reasons people think they’re not bad.

Crap my answer was deleted so re writing it. im saying that search engines try to figure out who you are. Not necessarily by name but your preferences. My work device and my personal device produced diff results for the same question for that reason. I didn’t post the articles because I didn’t consider the content as part of the experiment just that the top answers were different. I liked that part of the experiment. Tis why guys like rv may say …. That stuff is or isn’t on my feed. That’s partial reality that they know he prefers left leaning stuff…. Consider using incognito mode on your browser and disable any cookies or other stuff to try to minimize this behavior. it’s also why people think their “phones” listen to them. Something like a work lap top with: work email and personal email a personal iPhone with work email and personal email + let’s say work contact phone #s etc. they tie that shyte together pretty easily. Public Wi-Fi + geo special can detect you standing in Walgreens looking in an aisle with pregnancy tests etc…. And hmmmmm. What can I market to this dude based on that. What ads on Facebook should I show you if you visited an ED site or whatever. all of that is tracked and sold by tech companies.

Seriously...SMH No, sections 9 and 10 of the U.S. Constitution have not been removed from the government site. They are still present in Article I, which outlines the powers of Congress. Section 9 specifically limits Congress's powers, while Section 10 restricts the powers of the states.

What the?!?! Just curious...how old are you?

Not sure honestly. I am not too astute with all of this AI stuff. Just the first thing that popped up. (I closed out the page)

Who’s copilot? Azure? Just curious a lot of these helper ai tools are called copilot these days

1. "mixed evidence" from CoPilot 2. from the cleveland clinic, discussing research connecting artificial sweeteners to diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, mood disorders, mental stress, autism, early menstruation, and other effects 3. From Health.com...not so much a dive into whether or not they are bad for you but rather list the top 10 sweeteners and a little description of each. In each, there is a segment on 'research has triggered concerns' in some form or another 4. From the Mayo Clinic, the same article you posted. You either didn't read all the way through, or you cherry picked the hell out of it. Here are a few other excerpts: Some research on long-term, daily use of artificial sweeteners suggests a link to a higher risk of stroke, heart disease and death overall. If you're living with a rare genetic disease called phenylketonuria. Foods and drinks with aspartame can lead to serious health problems. If you have a bowel disease. Using sugar substitutes might make your symptoms flare up. And then finally, their "bottom line" Artificial sweeteners can be a short-term way to help some people lessen their use of sugar and lose or manage weight. In general, sugar substitutes are safe for healthy adults. But be aware of how sugar substitutes affect your food and drink choices. These ingredients may get your tastebuds used to sweetness. And that can make drinking enough water a challenge. Products made with sugar substitutes also may give you the wrong message about processed foods. A snack labeled low sugar or no sugar may not be the most nutritious choice. Whole foods, such as fruits and vegetables, usually have the best mix of nutrients for the body. 5. The healthline article you posted, and again cherry picked the hell out of. For example, you didn't include the section that talked about links to depression and seizures, or the section that talked about detoriating gut health which leads to weight gain, poor blood sugar control, metabolic syndrome, weakened immune system. So my point of posting all of this, is not to convince you personally that artificial sweeteners are not a good choice, but to....well I will just go back to what I said above..."But in order to get down to the truth of things, one would have to conduct such a search with subjectivity, with the intent to learn, not search with the intent of confirmation bias." (which would include cherry picking information out of articles you look up to only focus on the information that would provide that confirmation bias)

The only response that I can give to the above quote that's even remotely able to reach far enough down to your level is: I am rubber and you are glue and whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!!!

The text of the Constitution on the official government site has been edited to remove Sections 9 and 10. It just so happens these are the sections that cover Judicial Review and Habeas Corpus. Does Trump not want people reading about these Constitutional Rights? Imagine if Joe Biden did something like this.

I’m confused, is he saying that the Cleveland Clinic, Health.com, and the Mayo Clinic are somehow biased to my prior opinions?

So you can't...got it! Why is it that some of you run when asked questions about your take on things??