All Activity

“GMA First Look.” Thanks for confirming you “saw it on GMA” via a conservative clipping it. So no link to the Today show video? Now more on the left are talking about it, but it’s because we’ve reached the complaining about the complaining about the alleged complaining stage.

Meanwhile... as quick as it started.. Hodgins TF the Mongolian 10-0. (I had to watch that one from the start... as I caught the last 10 seconds of THAT bout, live.) D3

Appears that I was wrong...

WOAH... 71Kg repechage match between the Azerbiajanin & Georgian ended w/ a possible game winning 4 pt move by Georgia.. but THAT move LOOKED like the banned Flying Squirrel move. But instead, it was scored a 2... AND the Georgian "won" the challenge BUT lost the bout 12-10. Still... Wow! D3

With regards to Olympic golds in freestyle they are just very hard to get with only 6 anva every 4 years and small margins make big difference.Iran was in the running for 86 kg but the shoulder issue came up. For 125 Geno came up with very aggressive tactics and Zare was not that type of wrestler to mirror that type of westling ( think back to the prior year where Geno actually slapped him in the final) and at 65 Amouzad got caught in the leg lace of dome( here questions are being asked of the technical committee why Iranians keep getting caught against Japan in this way). on the positive side the elite Iranian wrestlers are usually have long careers and medal regularly. For example the often overlooked Nokhodi at 18 won an Asian senior bronze medal and at 24 has 2 world silver and 2 world bronze to add to that. Not many 24 year olds in the USA or Japan can boast his accomplishments and he does not get much headlines. This is set against competition that includes Russia and the Russian exports( Including Taz, Ramazanov, Valiev Salakzanov, Tsabalov etc) Japan( in the lower weight) USA and the rest of the world. looks like to me we expect the freestyle team to get multiple gold medals in the Olympics and with every single wrestler wrestling like Saitiev and demolishing their opponents with technical falls in spectacular fashion.This seems very unrealistic .If Firouzpour wins the gold medal at 92 kg in freestyle wrestling in the style of current Iranian wrestling keeping a disciplined stance with underhooks and high forward pressure then that’s still a very high achievement given the level of the competition that is around and I will take that for sure.

It’s still all over the news almost a week later. CNN, NBC etc …… liberal tears are still flowing over an ad about blue jeans. Woke is a joke.

Back on the air again... repechage rounds goin on. https://arena.uww.org/sport-event/show/1f05bb86-940b-6504-95ef-a3e0f04ec8ff/live FS - 92 kgRepechage772(USA) Tanner James HODGINS (7)(MGL) Saruul Erdene ERDENETSOGT (6) Is up om Mat B soon... D3

You’re a clown. It has GMA in the title. Bahahahahahahahahahahah.

I’m guessing you’re well aware of what sucking donkey dick is all about. And yes, anything that slows down you wokester commies is good for this country. Carry on snow plow driver from MN.

Snow plow driver from Mn needs snow bad. Summer makes him so angry.

His own mental mush brain reasons. Someone should rewatch the debate. Bahahahahahah.

I just watched Vito's match against Dzhelep of Ukraine. Definitely the 4 for Vito (vs 2)was really questionable imo as well. Still not up to his usual self (Ongoing nerve/injury recovery, still) especially against this Ukranian (didn't see him listed in the UWW top twenty ratings) Will Vito ever get back to the way he was (world champion form?) Would like to see him back to his fast form again! D3

There was time. Pelosi didn’t want a primary and she does what she wants. Commies

Hamas isn't the same thing as the general Gazan population. You aren't punishing hamas by starving gazan kids to death. Dumbest strategy ever, and most inhumane at same time.

https://www.sportzona.pl/app/events/view/wrestling/6884 Click on Protokoly (PDF) or switch the page to english at the very top.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8ku3fg6/ Transcript of you won’t click the link. It’s an ap journalist discussing how Hamas censorship works in western journalism 00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 The AP, as far as I know, 00:00:02 --> 00:00:05 I was the first staffer to erase information from a story 00:00:05 --> 00:00:07 because we were threatened by Hamas, 00:00:07 --> 00:00:09 which happened at the very end of, 00:00:09 --> 00:00:11 of 2008. We had a great reporter in Gaza, 00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 a Palestinian who had always been, um, 00:00:14 --> 00:00:15 really an excellent reporter. 00:00:15 --> 00:00:16 We had a detail in a story. 00:00:16 --> 00:00:18 The detail was a crucial one. 00:00:18 --> 00:00:20 It was that Hamas fighters were dressed as civilians 00:00:20 --> 00:00:23 and were being counted as civilians in the death toll, 00:00:24 --> 00:00:27 an important thing to know that went out in an AP story. 00:00:27 --> 00:00:29 The reporter called me a few hours later. 00:00:29 --> 00:00:31 It was clear that someone had spoken to him. 00:00:32 --> 00:00:34 And he told me, I was on the desk in Jerusalem, 00:00:34 --> 00:00:37 so I was kind of writing the story from the main bureau in Jerusalem. 00:00:37 --> 00:00:38 And he said, Mattie, 00:00:38 --> 00:00:40 you have to take that detail out of the story. 00:00:40 --> 00:00:42 And it was clear that someone had threatened him. 00:00:42 --> 00:00:43 I took the detail out of the story. 00:00:43 --> 00:00:47 I suggested to, to our editors that we note in an editor's note 00:00:47 --> 00:00:50 that we were now complying with Hamas censorship. 00:00:50 --> 00:00:53 I was overruled. And from that point in time, 00:00:53 --> 00:00:55 the AP, like all of its sister organizations, 00:00:55 --> 00:00:57 collaborates with Hamas censorship in Gaza. 00:00:57 --> 00:00:58 What does that mean? 00:00:59 --> 00:01:02 You'll see a lot of dead civilians and you won't see dead militants. 00:01:02 --> 00:01:05 You won't have a clear idea of what the Hamas military strategy is. And, 00:01:05 --> 00:01:08 and this is the kicker. The center Of the coverage will be a number, 00:01:08 --> 00:01:11 a casualty number that is provided to the press 00:01:11 --> 00:01:13 by something called the Gaza Health Ministry, 00:01:13 --> 00:01:17 which is Hamas. And we've been doing that since 2,008. 00:01:17 --> 00:01:18 And it's a way of basically 00:01:19 --> 00:01:22 settling the story before you get into any other information. 00:01:22 --> 00:01:23 Because when you put, you know, 00:01:23 --> 00:01:26 when you say 50,000, 50, 00:01:26 --> 00:01:29 50 Palestinians were killed and one Israeli on a given day, 00:01:29 --> 00:01:32 you know, it doesn't matter what else you say. 00:01:32 --> 00:01:34 The numbers kind of tell their own story. 00:01:34 --> 00:01:35 And it's a way of kind of 00:01:35 --> 00:01:36 settling the story 00:01:36 --> 00:01:38 with something that sounds like a concrete statistic. 00:01:38 --> 00:01:41 And the statistic is being, 00:01:41 --> 00:01:45 you know, given to us by one of the combatant sides. 00:01:45 --> 00:01:47 But because the reporters sympathize with that side, 00:01:47 --> 00:01:50 they're happy to, they're happy to play along. 00:01:50 --> 00:01:52 So since 2008, certainly since 2014, 00:01:52 --> 00:01:55 when we had another serious war in Gaza, 00:01:55 --> 00:01:58 the press has not been covering in Gaza. 00:01:58 --> 00:01:59 The press has been essentially 00:01:59 --> 00:02:04 an amplifier for one of the most poisonous ideologies on earth. 00:02:04 --> 00:02:09 Hamas has figured out how to make the press amplify its messaging 00:02:09 --> 00:02:11 rather than covering Hamas. 00:02:11 --> 00:02:13 There are no western reporters in Gaza. 00:02:13 --> 00:02:17 All of the reporters in Gaza are Palestinians. 00:02:17 --> 00:02:19 And those people fall into three categories. 00:02:19 --> 00:02:21 Some of them identify with Hamas. 00:02:21 --> 00:02:24 Some of them are intimidated by Hamas and won't cross Hamas, 00:02:24 --> 00:02:25 which makes a lot of sense. 00:02:25 --> 00:02:27 I wouldn't want to cross Hamas either. 00:02:27 --> 00:02:28 And the third category is people. 00:02:28 --> 00:02:30 Who actually belong to Hamas. 00:02:31 --> 00:02:34 That's where the information from Gaza is coming from. 00:02:34 --> 00:02:36 And if you're credulous, then of course, 00:02:36 --> 00:02:39 you're gonna get a story that makes Israel look pretty bad.

Vito beats Turner 2-0. Think it was a shot clock and a stepout

Just release the hostages. That’s pretty easy to do.

D3

Also, this isn’t actually GMA, it’s “GMA First Look,” which apparently is on at like 4AM. And the hosts didn’t really provide an opinion, they just interviewed some college professor that complained about it. @JimmySpeaks, can you share a link to it being on the Today show? I searched and can’t find it, although apparently there was an article (I was today years old when I learned the Today Show even had a website with articles).

They've already murdered orders of magnitude more gazan kids than the total number of Israelis killed, with many more starving to death every single day. Yes, hamas is bad and does bad things. That doesn't give them the right to do whatever they want though.

any bracket links?

Blaze was losing 6-6 to Georgia with 30 seconds to go, got a takedown, leg lace then Georgia guy goes for a desperation move and then kinda gives up, Blaze gets the fall

Showing more ignorance. A political party can nominate whoever and however they want. Nobody outside the psrty is entitled to any "say." Biden was a vegetable so they needed a replacement and there wasn't time to re- do the primaries. It's that simple.