All Activity

CNBC still talking about it https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/24/american-eagle-swatch-sanex-why-brands-keep-getting-ads-so-wrong.html

I'm pretty sure being a convicted felon is a forever thing. It's already been decided in court, survived several appeals, etc. He will die a convicted felon and rapist. Which from the look of things might be sooner rather than later.

Van Dee vs Ayoub is for 133. I have to think Young is not in contention for 149. Especially after season when DT and co. opted for a banged up Teague over him at 149.

Sorry yes wreststat no s

Jesse Mendez is a fourth year senior...

Gantry beat me to it

Wonder what personality your going to assume here boss

wrestlingstats or wrestlestat? I get the 404 when I try wrestlingstats.

Nope, can't get in either. I think GMF may be trying wrestlestat.com and not wrestlingstats.com - two different (and valuable) websites.

Oh well.

You seem to have a 50 viagra sized hard on for this topic boss.

I'm sure if he has one available/ they will find something to enable a MedRS don't you know everyone goes to college for 6 + years now

Thanks. Weird. I am still getting 404 using the bookmark I created years ago and if I type in the URL.

Well you do keep replying…

125 Lauridsen v Koehler, McCrone v Kilkeary, Van Dee vs Ayoub 133 Davino v Bouzakis, Davis v Nagao v Ono v Blaze 141 149 Young v Jamison v Swiderski, Echemendia v Johnson v Frost, Buesgens v Zepeda 157 Cannon v Gallagher, Travis v Robideau, Kasak v Duke, Catrabone v Gilcher 165 Gallagher v Birden 174 184 Ryder v Thompson, Ferrari v Arnold 197 Geog v Shumate, Barr v Mirasola 285

just got in no problem

Yeah well, my advice to you is just keep the faith.

It seems wrestlingstats.com has gone offline this morning. It was there last night, but mow the URL results in a 404 Not Found error. Does anyone have any insight?

Dershowitz said there is no client list. I think he would have used one in court if there was one. He said some judges should have released everything (the whatever files) years ago.

Yes, the same ones that Trump made a point of saying would be released as part of his campaign promises. The same ones Biondi said are sitting on her desk. The same ones Kash Patel said had a list of clients that later made his eyes bug out so horribly. The same ones that Elon Musk said contained Donald Trump's name. The same ones Trump has worked so hard, and so successfully, to distract you from. Yes, those.

Answer the question. Who on this board is ok with that ?

Mr Originality still not able to think for himself

Yes, you are definitely the superintendent of clear thinking. Your herd knows no better sheep.

Agreed. As a conservative you definitely have it and display it regularly on here.