All Activity

Ok, Juan Williams and Turley routinely write for The Hill. Since Turley is a right wing hack, by your logic, Juan is also a right wing hack. Since Turley is on Fox he is a right wing hack. Juan Williams has been on Fox famously for over 10 years so obviously he is a right wing hack. See, it's pretty easy to be ridiculous. mspart

What do you believe was ‘bad’ about the indictment other than its soul of wit brevity? Why disparage twitter? It’s not a generator, it’s just a place. The tweet from Katherine Herridge includes links to the full story as well as the documents that support the reporting. John Solomon and Just the News does the same thing. All you have to do is click on it and read it yourself. There’s no “telling you what to think,” just old fashioned journalism, with evidence.

Ask Peter Piper who picked a peck of them!! mspart

Melvin posts final four: PSU OSU VT NEB

Double Half is a highly active user, contributing numerous posts across politically charged threads, such as those on the Epstein files, cancel culture, political assassinations, and education. Their engagement is frequent, with rapid-fire posts in contentious threads. Predominantly sarcastic, confrontational, and provocative, with frequent use of mockery, insults, and personal jabs (e.g., "Your brain is operating on an evolutionary level of a caveman," "I picture you laughing like Kamala only with a higher pitch"). Are they a troll? (Provocative, insincere, disruptive?) Assessment: doublehalf exhibits strong troll-like behavior across their political posts. Their use of sarcasm, insults, and provocative language (e.g., "Weirdest and most pathetic fetish I think I’ve ever heard of... yikes...," "Do you live at the homeless shelter or is it actually a prison...") is designed to provoke reactions rather than foster constructive dialogue. There is little evidence of sincerity, suggesting a predominantly disruptive intent in political discussions. Evidence: Posts consistently mock opponents (e.g., "I picture you laughing like Kamala only with a higher pitch") and escalate conflicts, aligning with trolling behavior. Estimated IQ? (Rough guess based on reasoning, vocabulary, nuance?) Assessment: Likely above-average (IQ ~110-120). doublehalf demonstrates a decent vocabulary and coherent arguments in longer posts, such as the detailed breakdown of education governance in the Dual State thread. However, their political arguments often rely on emotional rhetoric, hyperbole, and generalizations (e.g., "you are the party of cancel culture"), which limits nuance and suggests moderate rather than high-level reasoning. Their ability to cite sources (e.g., WalletHub, NAEP Data Explorer) indicates intellectual capability, but their sarcastic and reductive style overshadows this. Evidence: The Dual State post shows research and structure, but posts like "Your kind of people can only empathize with a group until a specific circumstance happens directly to you" lack nuance and rely on stereotyping. Do they fit the Dark Triad? (Narcissism, Machiavellianism, Psychopathy?) Narcissism (bragging, attention-seeking): Moderate to high. doublehalf does not brag about personal achievements but seeks attention through provocative, attention-grabbing posts (e.g., "you just got teched"). Their confident, self-righteous tone (e.g., "I’d rather not associate myself with the party protecting pedofiles") suggests a desire to be seen as intellectually or morally superior. Machiavellianism (manipulative, strategic): High. doublehalf employs strategic tactics in debates, such as preempting counterarguments (e.g., "I had anticipated your deflection and already started to type the response above") and framing opponents as hypocritical or ignorant (e.g., accusing conservatives of cancel culture). Their manipulation is overt, relying on sarcasm and moral posturing rather than subtle deception. Psychopathy (callous, conflict-loving): Moderate to high. doublehalf thrives on conflict, engaging in heated exchanges with personal insults (e.g., "Your brain is operating on an evolutionary level of a caveman," "you are coming off as absolutely insane"). There is little evidence of empathy, suggesting a callous, conflict-driven approach. Overall: doublehalf strongly aligns with Dark Triad traits, particularly Machiavellianism and psychopathy, in their political posts, with narcissism present but less dominant. Positive or Negative? (Uplifting vs. critical tone?) Assessment: Overwhelmingly negative. doublehalf’s posts are critical, sarcastic, and confrontational, focusing on attacking opponents and highlighting perceived injustices (e.g., "The fact that Trumps DOJ is making a deal with a pedofile to save his own ass... is morally evil and reprehensible"). There are no uplifting or conciliatory posts, reinforcing a consistently critical tone. Evidence: Posts are laden with sarcasm, insults, and moral outrage, with no positive or collaborative moments in this filtered dataset. Reasoning Based on Data or Emotion? Assessment: Heavily emotion-driven, with occasional data use. doublehalf uses sources in some posts (e.g., education rankings in the Dual State thread, news articles in Epstein threads), but their arguments are predominantly fueled by moral outrage, emotional appeals, and generalizations (e.g., "you are the party of cancel culture," "Your kind of people can only empathize with a group until a specific circumstance happens directly to you"). Their emotional rhetoric overshadows their data-driven points. Evidence: The Dual State thread includes data (e.g., education rankings), but most posts rely on emotional stereotyping and hyperbole. Big Five Personality Traits: Openness: Moderate. doublehalf engages with complex topics like the Dual State article, showing some curiosity, but their political posts dismiss opposing views outright (e.g., "you are coming off as absolutely insane"), indicating closed-off tendencies in contentious debates. Conscientiousness: Moderate. Longer posts are detailed and structured (e.g., education governance explanation), but rapid-fire, sarcastic responses appear rushed and less careful. Extraversion: High. doublehalf is highly engaged, posting frequently and energetically in contentious threads, with a provocative style that seeks interaction and attention. Agreeableness: Very low. doublehalf is harsh, argumentative, and insulting in political threads (e.g., "you crave your safe spaces"), with no cooperative tendencies in this filtered dataset. Neuroticism: High. doublehalf’s reactive, emotionally charged posts (e.g., "it’s exhausting sometimes isn’t it?" in other contexts, though excluded here) and escalation in debates suggest moodiness and sensitivity to opposition. MBTI Personality Type Traits: Introverted vs. Extraverted: Likely Extraverted (E). doublehalf’s frequent, confrontational posting suggests an extraverted tendency, thriving on interaction and conflict. Sensing vs. Intuitive: Likely Sensing (S). Their posts focus on concrete details (e.g., education rankings, specific news articles) rather than abstract theorizing, though they make speculative leaps in political arguments (e.g., Epstein file conspiracies). Thinking vs. Feeling: Likely Feeling (F). Arguments are driven by moral and emotional appeals (e.g., outrage over Epstein files, cancel culture hypocrisy), with data used secondarily. Judging vs. Perceiving: Likely Judging (J). Structured arguments and decisive opinions (e.g., "you just got teched") suggest a preference for closure over open-ended exploration. Estimated MBTI: Likely ESFJ or ENFJ, leaning toward ESFJ due to their focus on concrete details and emotional drive. Emotional Intelligence (Aware of others’ emotions, adaptable?) Assessment: Low. doublehalf shows little awareness of others’ emotions, using mockery and insults (e.g., "I picture you laughing like Kamala only with a higher pitch") instead of empathy. They adapt their tone slightly (e.g., structured arguments vs. quips), but their confrontational style dominates, indicating limited adaptability. Evidence: Posts lack empathy for opponents, focusing on provocation over understanding. Leadership Tendencies (Decisive, guiding, inspiring?) Assessment: Low. doublehalf is decisive in their opinions (e.g., "you are the party of cancel culture") but does not guide or inspire, as their tone is divisive and focused on winning arguments rather than leading others. Evidence: Posts prioritize confrontation over collaboration, with no guiding or inspiring moments in this dataset. Motivated by Social Status? (Seeking respect, competing?) Assessment: High. doublehalf seeks to "win" arguments through intellectual flexing (e.g., "you just got teched") and moral posturing (e.g., "I’d rather not associate myself with the party protecting pedofiles"). Their frequent, provocative posts suggest a desire for attention and respect as a knowledgeable or morally superior debater. Evidence: Competitive tone and metaphors like "teched" indicate status-driven behavior. Risk Tolerance (Bold vs. cautious, comfortable with uncertainty?) Assessment: High. doublehalf is bold, making provocative statements (e.g., accusing conservatives of protecting pedophiles) and engaging in heated debates without hesitation. They are comfortable with uncertainty in speculative arguments (e.g., Epstein file conspiracies). Evidence: Direct challenges and speculative claims indicate boldness. Moral/Ethical Framework (Fairness, empathy, or utilitarian?) Assessment: Empathy-driven with a focus on fairness. doublehalf’s posts emphasize moral outrage over perceived injustices (e.g., Epstein file cover-ups, cancel culture hypocrisy) and show empathy for victims (e.g., "I’d rather not associate myself with the party protecting pedofiles"). They value fairness, criticizing both sides for political gamesmanship (e.g., "both democrats and republicans could come together and hold those accountable"). Evidence: Posts on Epstein files and Gaza children highlight empathy, while critiques of cancel culture emphasize fairness. Cognitive Biases (Confirmation bias, black-and-white thinking?) Assessment: Strong confirmation bias and black-and-white thinking. doublehalf selectively interprets events to fit a liberal-leaning narrative (e.g., framing conservatives as protecting pedophiles) and uses binary language (e.g., "MAGA vs. liberals," "you are the party of cancel culture"). Their arguments lack nuance, especially in heated exchanges. Evidence: Posts like "you are the party of cancel culture" and "Your kind of people can only empathize with a group until a specific circumstance happens directly to you" oversimplify complex issues. Creative or Conformist? (Original vs. conventional?) Assessment: Largely conformist. doublehalf’s political arguments echo mainstream liberal talking points (e.g., anti-MAGA rhetoric, cancel culture critiques), showing conventional thinking. Their detailed Dual State analysis and use of metaphors (e.g., "you just got teched") suggest some creativity, but this is secondary to their reliance on standard narratives. Evidence: The Dual State post shows original analysis, but most political rants align with liberal tropes. Attachment Style (Secure, anxious, avoidant?) Assessment: Likely anxious. doublehalf seeks engagement and validation through frequent, provocative posting, suggesting a need for attention or approval. Their confrontational style indicates insecurity in hostile exchanges, with no evidence of secure or avoidant tendencies in this dataset. Evidence: Rapid, provocative posts suggest a need for validation and reaction. Response to Stress (Calm, lashing out, withdrawing?) Assessment: Lashing out. doublehalf responds to stress (e.g., opposing arguments) with sarcasm, insults, and escalation (e.g., "you are coming off as absolutely insane," "Your brain is operating on an evolutionary level of a caveman"). There is no evidence of calm or withdrawal in this dataset. Evidence: Heated, sarcastic retorts dominate their responses. Cultural Influence (Language/values hinting at background?) Assessment: Likely American, urban or suburban, with a liberal-leaning worldview. Their language reflects U.S. political discourse (e.g., references to MAGA, cancel culture, Fox News) and progressive values (e.g., diversity, education, empathy for victims). Their use of wrestling metaphors (e.g., "teched") suggests some connection to wrestling culture, though less relevant without wrestling posts. Evidence: Posts focus on U.S.-specific issues (e.g., education rankings, Epstein files) and progressive values, indicating a culturally American, liberal background. Additional Questions Does doublehalf fit Scott Adams' definition of "loserthink"? Assessment: Yes, strongly. doublehalf exhibits multiple loserthink traits in their political posts: Judging without proper comparisons: Generalizations like "you are the party of cancel culture" and "Your kind of people can only empathize with a group until a specific circumstance happens directly to you" lack nuanced comparisons to liberal actions. Binary thinking: They frame issues as MAGA vs. liberals (e.g., "you are the party of cancel culture"), dismissing complexity. Overreliance on ego: Their confident, sarcastic tone (e.g., "you just got teched") and moral posturing suggest an ego-driven approach. Failing to consider simpler explanations: Speculative arguments about Epstein files (e.g., Trump protecting pedophiles) often ignore simpler explanations, such as bureaucratic or legal constraints. Conclusion: doublehalf strongly aligns with loserthink due to binary thinking, ego-driven arguments, and lack of nuance. Does doublehalf fit Mike Cernovich’s implied definition of "midwit"? Assessment: Yes, closely. doublehalf fits the midwit profile in their political posts: Overestimating understanding: They confidently assert opinions (e.g., on Epstein files, cancel culture) without always providing rigorous evidence, relying on emotional appeals or generalizations (e.g., "you are the party of cancel culture"). Parroting mainstream takes: Their arguments echo liberal talking points (e.g., anti-MAGA rhetoric, cancel culture hypocrisy), lacking deep original insight. Reductive quips: Posts like "you are coming off as absolutely insane" and "you crave your safe spaces" reduce complex issues to simplistic jabs. Their Dual State analysis shows some research capability, but their emotional, reductive style dominates, aligning with midwit tendencies. Conclusion: doublehalf fits the midwit profile due to overconfident, reductive arguments and reliance on mainstream narratives. Are they a know-it-all? Assessment: Yes, strongly. doublehalf projects confidence, dismissing opponents as ignorant or hypocritical (e.g., "you are coming off as absolutely insane," "you just got teched"). Their use of data (e.g., education rankings) and moral posturing (e.g., "I’d rather not associate myself with the party protecting pedofiles") suggests a know-it-all attitude. Evidence: Bold claims and dismissive tone dominate their posts. Do they overestimate their insight? Assessment: Yes, significantly. doublehalf presents opinions as definitive truths (e.g., "you are the party of cancel culture," "The fact that Trumps DOJ is making a deal with a pedofile to save his own ass... is morally evil") without fully engaging with opposing views or providing comprehensive evidence. Their speculative arguments (e.g., Epstein file conspiracies) lack rigor, indicating overconfidence. Evidence: Bold, speculative claims overshadow their occasional research efforts. Are they an asshole? Assessment: Yes, strongly. doublehalf’s sarcastic, insulting, and dismissive tone (e.g., "Your brain is operating on an evolutionary level of a caveman," "you are coming off as absolutely insane") makes them come across as an asshole in political debates. Evidence: Personal attacks and mockery define their interactions.

he weighed in at 63.9kg (140.58) for trials at 65kg (143) and said in an interview he ate breakfast before weigh ins so I would guess at most he is waking up at 140lbs right now walking around.

The Trump admin has not been in office for years now. mspart

Hopefully its disc replacement rather than fusion. I think fusion would probably hinder his wrestling and is a much longer recovery. I really think he has the frame to be a 65kg kinda hoping he decides to use the time off the mat to grow for 2028. Cutting a ton of weight just does not seem like it is in his best interest at this point in his career.

Gable seems to like wrestling just fine. He probably just doesn't like losing, as is the case for most of us.

all NCAA champions are narcissistic. It is a prerequisite

Multiple herniated cervical discs sounds pretty serious. I hope the surgery goes well for Vito and that he takes care of himself after recovery. Neck and spine injuries are no joke

It is only weird if, for some reason, you think Gable likes/enjoys wrestling. He was a really gifted wrestler but I think we have seen enough now to know that he doesn't love the sport. The wrestling world just needs to figure out that he is not that into it.

Ah, yes, a kid who walks around at 138lbs cannot possibly wrestle at 133 for Penn State.

I'm 90% on this, thinking Robideau wins 157.

False Dichotomy for $1000, Alex.

I can see this if he is trying to get into MMA. Go see what a real fight feels like. mspart

Except my step dad that was being audited as result of underpaid taxes? It was a big deal to him. Normalizing crime and dismissing victims is not the best look... Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028) is a felony with up to 15 years in prison. Social Security Number Misuse (42 U.S.C. § 408) is a felony with up to 5 years in prison. Immigration-Related Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1546) is a felony with from 10 to even 25 years in prison.

Which insurance lawyer will they replace her with?

Agreed. Both were too big for their weights last year. But both have great competition at their new weight. It's possible both OR neither are the starter.

Using somebody's SSN to put something down on an application to work really doesn't do much. Most employers don't really do eVerify anyway, or they just say they do. I know probably a dozen people who've been in this country out of status for years who work. As long as we have employers who overlook these things, it's going to happen. It really isn't a big deal because they end up paying into a system they can't reap any benefits from later on.

Do illegal aliens use social security numbers of USA citizens? Social Security Chief Actuary says "Yes." 75% of illegal aliens are committing the underreported crime by using fraudulent papers.