Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Es ist schockierend, dass Sie das nicht auf Deutsch gepostet haben.
  3. Looks like you have your next data project. Time to get researching on the heights off all past Olympic/World Champs at each weight.
  4. I think the 'American wrestling is the best MMA base' argument is can no longer hold up to scrutiny, but I think there are plenty of great athletes that will come from American wrestling and have good MMA careers. But to do that, they'll have to shed the notion that their wrestling is going to carry them to the top. Bo didn't even do well in wrestling positions. That should be a wakeup call to him.
  5. He has a great attack rate and offensive arsenal, judging from his US Open
  6. it's 2030 america is being invaded trump sends the military to bottle up the beach head and send them back into the sea an activist judge stops the military from shooting... demanding a hearing for each soldier before they can be attacked dems and crazy woke wingers (but I repeat myself) applaud the judges ruling
  7. Obviously Biden didn't believe in the Constitution and did not fulfill his oath of office. If he had Trump wouldn't have to be wasting his time on a workaround. I don't understand how Obama was able to cage immigrants & children, deport them and carry out drone strikes without due process. Maybe they taught him a loop hole at Harvard Law. Also how did we get around due process with the 911 perpetrators sent to GITMO? Maybe they were never in the US but I do remember folks complaining.
  8. After looking up the UFC top 16 rankings, the the only D1 wrestlers I can identify offhand are Michael Chandler and Colby Covington. That's... not a lot. Has MMA evolved to the point where it's nearly impossible for D1 wrestlers to make it to the top of MMA?
  9. So are the Larkin Boys staying put in ASU? There was soooooo much smoke that they were leaving to ISU. Or is there still smoke?
  10. i agree, obama never ASKED if he had to follow the constitution. he just did it. and rightly so.
  11. probably pretty well, but he can actually make world teams so that’s on hold for now.
  12. watch out for the spying tech
  13. i was just going to post to trimp that NO ONE ever asked him ANY questions about anything of substance
  14. omg you are such a .. i dont even know what to call you the TDS is so strong... i bet you know what color under wear he is wearing
  15. stop gaslighting. you white knighted for obama when many to most of his deportees also got no 'due process'
  16. You just have to be open to realizing that there are alter egos for every person on this board. Sometimes several.
  17. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/tariff-tides-chinese-manufacturers-flock-to-nevada-texas-amid-us-trade-pressures/ar-AA1EdcgU?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=b9870741d1a14e7c96f8ee897bf64b71&ei=24 hmmmmmmmmm
  18. For someone with TDS you sure seem to care about Biden getting talked about. Kinda weird
  19. Yesterday
  20. This Maybe slipsntweet will catch on
  21. You’re too clueless to realize he’s got lawyers interpreting things. Thats why he said it. But you knew that already because 15 people have told you.
  22. better than your god apparently
  23. The interesting thing here, and everyone knows it whether they want to admit it or not, is that if it were Biden sitting in that chair giving that same answer, the same people who are trying to “context” it, and/or bringing in Biden to the conversation when he has nothing to do with it, just because they can’t get him off the brain, would be having a fit over him having that same answer. We saw plenty of those fits the previous four years. And we see the Biden inclusion all The time now over things where it’s completely irrelevant. But…something something DS
  24. Again, Trump did not say he does not have to follow the Constitution. He was asked about Due Process for Abrego and he was saying he was not clear on that particular matter. He is leaving that up to the attorneys responsible for that. If you are going to insist that Trump said he does not have to follow the Constitution, then you are simply willfully being ignorant of the context of the conversation that was had, and quite literally knowingly acting ignorant because this has been explained a number of times. It is not logical to pursue that line because you know the context in which this whole thing was said, similar to my example about Africans. You won't understand because you don't want to. You want to take everything out of context and say see, he wants to be a dictator, he wants to be Hitler. It ain't working guys. It just shows how pathetic your reasoning ability and overall outlook is. Try being reasonable, it works most of the time. mspart
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...