All Activity

Make a real point. Should people be forced to support or buy shyte they don’t agree with their politics? It’s not like conservatives are running around town tearing down statues in the middle of the night of folks they don’t agree with. Or shooting law enforcement officers for enforcing the law. Or burning teslas. Or taking over city blocks. Or throwing paint on nice coats. Or gluing themselves to the highway. Or supporting terrorists in Palestine by shutting down high ways.

This we can agree on 100%. It is amazing on toast. With pasta. On salads. Like you said above with balsamic maybe on or with bruschetta…. Or just alone. Truly a good one.

Maybe you guys really don't understand what cancel culture is after all... that's not surprising.

Well regardless of how cute you are attempting to be, the fact remains burrata is a FANTASTIC cheese

Precisely what i thought of your list of things that have been cancelled, but are still available.

Conservatives lose a presidential election? They riot, damage property, storm the capital, beat cops and *I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* on people's desks. Someone believes in god? They can't just go about their day but make legislative changes to put up the 10 commandments in classrooms in an entire state. Are there people that do stupid *I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* on both sides and destroy property? Yeah no doubt... To pretend like conservatives have some more high ground because they didn't break a window on a Tesla is laughable. The fact that Trumps DOJ is making a deal with a pedofile to save his own ass after campaigning on release of the unvarnished truth is morally evil and reprehensible. I actually was hopeful there for a bit there was finally a bipartisan issue we could all get behind but low and behold MAGA is marching in place. I'd rather not associate myself with the party protecting pedofiles. I'll let that one sit for a while...

Kneel during the anthem in the nfl. Conservatives just stop going. Have a tranny be your spokes man for your beer. Conservatives don’t buy it…. The product. It’s called the free market. I don’t like the aunt Jemima or uncle Ben’s logo? The left cancels different. They force/make the thing they want to cancel go away. Why can’t they just not buy the syrup or rice like regular adults. I dunno. as far as Colbert. Cry me a river. The program is a thing medium and was not profitable. What on earth does that have to do with Trump. Why would abc want to keep losing $40m a year Tranny drag shows and blow job books still exist. Just not in kiddy schools where they never belonged in the first place. Seems to me nut job lefties are burning teslas their plants etc. so I’m not even sure what this is. climate change is a 6,873 page thread. I’ll let that one sit.

This is the most delusional post I've ever seen to say that there is no conservative cancel agenda haha... All you have to do is watch Fox News for 5 minutes to see this and it goes way back. If by some chance you are serious and not just trolling (which is largely the MAGA party platform under Trump) you really need to take a step back... The right has always been the party of the culture wars and cancel culture is a foundational part of that. The left has certainly gone too far with it on certain things in the past but to say there is no conservative agenda is one of the most naive things I've seen posted here.

I’d say nothing on your list (other than maybe big tech, due to its widespread use) enjoys support of anywhere near half the country. There is no conservative cancel agenda, it’s simply that they resist spending money, through tax or personal purchases, that goes to support policies, programs, or products that they find morally reprehensible.

Twas a cute burisma joke

Wow... man on a mission!

Burrata is a fantastic cheese. Drizzle some balsamic over that and just yum it right up.

But China gives our cool cool politicians some of the best burrata cheese out there. That or $$,$$$,$$$.

The left uses the environment as a means to push socialism. They don't give 2 squirts about the environment, just look at the aftermath of any leftist protest. Calling CO2 a dangerous gas is strictly for the purpose of control. Environmentalism was started by conservatives and high jacked by the left. If the left was concerned about the environment they would hold the dirtiest countries accountable instead kowtowing to China.

yeah just like whoever beat john smith his sophmore year had a way better career.

The executive order is plainly unenforceable as impermissible executive legislation. Though directionally appropriate it's also ill considered and will serve only to inject added chaos to an already messy environment.

Yes because half the country doesn't have an issues with those things... Just because something is available doesn't mean it hasn't been a victim of cancel culture... Dr Seuss books are also still available but we can agree the liberals tried to cancel certain books because of outdated racist tropes.... I swear the amount of playing dumb here about cancel culture is mind boggling. At least liberals owned it when they cancelled people vs the GOP who pretends like they aren't.

Is Mel Gibson offering to turn the place around?

Everything on the list is still available.

Drilling and refining.

Once we take military control of the moon that won't be a problem anymore. If Trump can't get a 3rd term we'll elect him to King of the moon. Those moon dwelling Martians won't know what hit them.

Be quick as hell. Copy that blueprint and you can beat anyone.

This thing is all about propping up non revenue sports and women’s sports. if you look at (iii) part D they gloss over the options for enforcement. It all comes down to federal imo Sec. 2. Protecting and Expanding Women’s and Non-Revenue Sports and Prohibiting Third-Party Pay-for-Play Payments. (a) It is the policy of the executive branch that opportunities for scholarships and collegiate athletic competition in women’s and non-revenue sports must be preserved and, where possible, expanded, including specifically as follows with respect to the 2025-2026 athletic season and future athletic seasons: (i) collegiate athletic departments with greater than $125,000,000 in revenue during the 2024-2025 athletic season should provide more scholarship opportunities in non-revenue sports than during the 2024-2025 athletic season and should provide the maximum number of roster spots for non-revenue sports permitted under the applicable collegiate athletic rules; (ii) college athletic departments with greater than $50,000,000 in revenue during the 2024-2025 athletic season should provide at least as many scholarship opportunities in non-revenue sports as provided during the 2024-2025 athletic season and should provide the maximum number of roster spots for non-revenue sports permitted under the applicable collegiate athletic rules; and (iii) college athletic departments with $50,000,000 or less in revenue during the 2024-2025 athletic season or that do not have any revenue-generating sports should not disproportionately reduce scholarship opportunities or roster spots for sports based on the revenue that the sport generates. (b) It is the policy of the executive branch that any revenue-sharing permitted between universities and collegiate athletes should be designed and implemented in a manner that preserves or expands scholarships and collegiate athletic opportunities in women’s and non-revenue sports. (c) To preserve the critical educational and developmental benefits of collegiate athletics for our Nation, it is the policy of the executive branch that third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes are improper and should not be permitted by universities. This policy does not apply to compensation provided to an athlete for the fair market value that the athlete provides to a third party, such as for a brand endorsement. (d) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Education, in consultation with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Education, and the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, shall develop a plan to advance the policies set forth in subsections (a)-(c) of this section through all available and appropriate regulatory, enforcement, and litigation mechanisms, including Federal funding decisions, enforcement of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, prohibiting unconstitutional actions by States to regulate interstate commerce, and enforcement of other constitutional and statutory protections, and by working with the Congress and State governments, as appropriate.

At least you recognize that the GOP uses censorship... that's a start I suppose