All Activity

I’m not worried about them. Seems like they’re worried about being broke.

It was media silence for a day or 2 on the Boelter story from the right, as some (not all) of them seemed to realize he was not a leftist. Now it’s revealed his writings claim Tim Walz told him to kill Senator Amy Klobuchar, and some of them seem to actually believe that happened lol

If there was, you'd probably be the keeper of it...anybody else, and it would have to be the Hefty Directory or the Immense Index.

The NYTs article is "evidence the DNC is broke," and that's your takeaway? Ok, so you didn't read the article. Got it. They raised more than the GOP in the first quarter. My opinion is this is nothing. They have some infighting as David Hogg wants to primary Democrats to put up the exact type of candidates that lose and that we've been primarying to try and get rid of them(Bush, Bowman...Talib) and the larger donors want to see the outcome. You realize you could go and find a dozen of these articles from... the RNC... And AGAIN, the DNC raised MORE than the RNC in the first quarter. So... first, if you post an article that isn't from a right wing site, make sure you can read it. You obviously couldn't and didn't in the first case. There are...dozens and dozens of articles about donors not wanting to donate to the RNC and the DNC out-raising them. We're not even close to the mid-terms, much less the next Presidential Election and you're worried about the Democrats when the right is normally complaining it's not fair they raise more? LOL....cool. Now, I gotta go take my Nephew on a 4-wheeler ride...I'll be back when you figure out exactly what your point is here.

Hey, I certainly appreciate this "scholarly intellect," you've...rather consistently assigned to me! I'm flattered you'd think so highly of me.

Evidence the dnc is broke boss. What’s your opinion. Please make it long.

So...what did that article say and what was the point of contention as YOU see it...given I'm sure you're not just going off a headline, right?

Yeah, I never said Harris, Hakm or AOC. Newsom would hardly be "laughable," but not my choice. And if you want to know what someone stands for, go look it up. But calling an Astronaut and literal Fighter Pilot a "loon," is a little silly. He's also one of the most bi-partisan Senators based on his voting history. But sure, "Loon." (Have you seen the cabinet or the guy who sits behind the resolute desk)? You want to know what Polis stands for, go listen to some speeches. JB Pritzker...again, too far, but he looses 40 pounds, he'd be a great candidate.

Of course that's their aim, I said when we pulled out of the JCPOA, there was no reason for THEM to hold up their end of the bargain. -I'm pointing out that SAME organization that... you're now taking as gospel, said they were Complient in 2018 and UNTIL Trump pulled out(which was particularly stupid as he's not telling Israel to stand down while he negotiates). -60% doesn't get you a Nuclear Weapon and AGAIN, the SAME organization, has said; So yeah, I don't believe they're a week away or we'd have bombed them by now. Some of you use the same source in one context, ignore it in another. -They're more definitely working TOWARD building a bomb.

LOL...so to recap, YOU made the claim that Iran was NOT living up to the agreement; So you just effectively said 'nuh-uh!' LOL...I simply pointed out what the DIRECTOR of National Intelligence said and HOW LONG Israel has been making the "one week away" claims. I've also REPEATEDLY said that Iran is OBVIOUSLY now enriching uranium. Of course they are. Why would they NOT? A Nuclear Weapon is a strong deterrent. What's more, I NEVER argued against bombing Iran(just the opposite). See.... reading is important Jimmy. I've advocated the US AIDING in regime change, I've never made it a secret which side I supported. Israel. ALWAYS been Israel. But this is where you're simply...not...capable of a coherent discussion. You contradict yourself regularly. You ALSO said; So.... any chance you can answer my question? -In 2018, it was a fake agreement, Iran did as they pleased despite the IAEA saying they were in accordance. -2025 'Here's PROOF they're enriching Uranium!' I know there's lots of words here and that's my fault. I'll probably get 4-5 replies in which you never actually answer MY question.

Mark Kelly is just not national enough, plus he is a loon. He has not shown leadership on anything to date on a big scale. Polis might be good but no name recognition. Who is he? Point taken about Trump's successor. JD is the most likely and seems to work in the similar way. I think most Rs would be on board. Harris, Newsom, Hakim, AOC? Laughable. mspart

https://nypost.com/2025/06/19/us-news/democrats-main-fundraising-committee-so-cash-strapped-its-considering-borrowing-money-really-f-ked/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3447050/dnc-cash-shrinks-leadership-fallout-continues/

Ahh ... thought you were suggesting going to watch it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/18/us/politics/dnc-ken-martin.html

LOL...ooh...the "Geller report!" That's... definitely a non-biased platform! And the truth; Why use actual sources with any credibility when you have a wacko and a Newsletter!

I already did this; I'd also add Jared Polis of Colorado would be an excellent candidate... if you just look at his political ideology, but he's gay, so his chances are non-existent. I'm...incredibly skeptical of anyone picking up from Trump in the "MAGA," party.

You tube has some really good videos with the MOP (GBU-57) in action. There are a good number of videos. How a Bunker Buster Bomb works. The video Is really good.

go ahead, tell us how you can use it from 2018, but discount it now

Classic victim blaming

We see the problem through the lens of adults with life experience. The victims at Ohio State were 23 and younger and working within a lopsided power dynamic.

FLO if it matters enough...

Tell us everything you know about Sentes and everything you think Sentes isn't...

I answered this question: “Please tell me this is coherent to someone else?” I made no comment as to what I agreed or disagreed with. I would have thought that someone with your scholarly intellect would have caught that, right off.