WrestlingRasta

So in this case, we’re just going to trust the government, where normally we would not; we should question everything. But this time, it’s ridiculous to question this governmental move, we should just trust them. and furthermore, it’s really going to be okay because there will be more government checking on them. It makes sense now.

I was referring to the stance of “well if there’s a conflict of interest wont the government officials responsible for that call it out” So in this instance people, who usually are all about questioning everything and not trusting the government, are taking a completely distance stance here. I wonder why?

So I have a serious question. What is the determining factor that switches us from , “question everything never trust the government” to “ well it’s okay…it’s the government. They will handle it appropriately”??

Same

Does extremely heavily influence, rather than ‘control’ change the argument about 1) being heavily conflict of interest and 2) trumps heavy track record of lying and lack of transparency. I’m happy to concede and make that change in language.

There haven’t been any Congress women claiming to have him showed them the videos.

Well, there was an ongoing process, related to just that, that by law automatically ceases once he resigned from congress. But I’m sure if we were talking about Hunter and democrat congressmen…you’d have the exact same feeling

Would republican comgressmen (notice that’s plural) stating how he was showing them video of sex with younger girls and talking about how he would crush ED meds and energy drinks so he could…..last…..be considered credible?

I may be reading incorrectly, as my RINO, TDS, heavily biased brain takes over my eyes……but I don’t see Vak, Wrestlknownothing saying at all there is not too much govt waste spending, or that an office for accountability to clean it up is a bad idea. What I see is them questioning the selections, 1) because there is very much a conflict of interest when a person with billions of dollars in government contracts gets put in charge of controlling government spending. (And I don’t dislike Elon. I listen to him regularly). And 2) Trumps proven track record….very very heavy track record, of lying and lack of transparency. Then I see other people saying, no no no you just want govt spending. And even when they repeat multiple times their issue is not the idea but the people picked to do it, they are met with replies to the effect of “NO—-YOURE SAYING WHAT I SAY YOURE SAYING”. The interesting thing in this is that those very people are very much in favor of questioning everything, particularly what the government is telling us. Maybe that doesn’t count when it’s coming from the nut swing (kinda like you don’t hate the media enough, well, except when….)

Confirmation should be interesting. Senate vote showed there are Republicans not afraid to go against Trumps wishes.

So was it FEMA doing this, or was it a person doing this. I know I know, a person who after being caught says she was as told to and everyone is…blah blah blah. But what we actually know is that it is a person, correct?

No I meant the big fraternity/football guy who can’t follow a conversation.

Careful Vak, this is going to be one of those times you don’t hate the media enough. Just wait for the onslaught of media links headed your way to prove you wrong.

We definitely know where to go for the drugs and hookers now! Rrrrasta!!

This argument is interesting. You have good articulated answers to questions, and then responses that kinda remind me of that dude with the long burp from revenge of the nerds.

Shaking hands, smiling, talking about working together. Is anyone not in favor of that?

There was a scene in the White House today that hopefully a whole lot of people will take notice, demand it be the new way, and follow the lead....

Why then, would you have congressmen/women, standing on the house floor saying “ WE ARE ultra-MAGA, super-MAGA”? Doesn’t “we are” clearly signify ‘a people’??

Unpaid invoices to about 20 different cities.

Shouldn’t he pay his own campaign debts, unpaid bills from rally’s, etc first? Or would that not be as ‘gangster’?

Nothing like being a strong advocate for division.

Speaking of pups…

You don’t, well, until they say something cool, then we’ll run with it and GOTCHA!!…but besides that. You don’t. You really don’t.