Jump to content

Le duke

Members
  • Posts

    2,854
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Le duke last won the day on August 16 2023

Le duke had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Le duke's Achievements

Big Brain

Big Brain (14/14)

  • One Year In
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

1.4k

Reputation

  1. Here’s the thing: If they went through the appropriate processes (Congress) to change the budget, that would be fine. That’s how it’s supposed to work. The President is not a king. If the next government funding bill kills all of these jobs and is signed into law, that’s sad, but that’s the appropriate process. Unfortunately for Elon and Co, they were ordered to stop what they were doing and destroy all copies of data by a federal judge. If they don’t, they go to jail. Another restored 3,000 USAID workers, where they will resume doing what federal law has authorized them to do. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. I don’t know who “Rachel” is. I’ve heard of The View, but have never watched it. No TVs or cable at work. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. Oh? What is their pay grade? Do they have government email addresses? Are they also being paid by anyone else? Have they filed appropriate conflict of interest forms? Have those been approved by a non-partisan approval authority? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. Let’s do a quick test: You guys (Willie in particular) are posting things from Twitter as if they are official government documents. If I create a Twitter account, gin up a (fake) receipt for the funding stream of Willie’s USAID-funded sex change operation, and post that to Twitter, will you believe that it is real? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. But they don’t. They aren’t government employees. Both of which are a requirement to access any information system. This is pretty basic stuff. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. But unlike Musk’s kids, they have an actual need to know, which is a requirement under the law to access any government computer system. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. How about this: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Tell me what changes in recruiting the Army has made in communication style or policy that would boost recruiting numbers. Please back any assertions up with official government guidance (which is all public). I’ll start: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/army-recruiting-up-data-show-trend-began-before-election-current-former-army-officials-say.amp Last sentence in the article: “In other words, the positive recruiting trend began before the election.” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. The method is to pass a new law. Not some people who have no official government role breaking into government facilities and government computer systems, and likely committing crimes in the process. That last sentence - are you suggesting that Trump’s budgets didn’t include many of these things? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. Please provide specific examples. I’ll go first: Federal agencies (CBP, for example) arrested a record number of illegal immigrants attempting to cross the border. Are you suggesting that they DID NOT arrest a record number of people? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. If Biden signed a bill into law to send candy corn to the UK until 2030, Trump can’t just stop sending it. It is funded by a literal federal law. He doesn’t have that unilateral power. His personal candy corn policy is irrelevant. Another relevant example: Idiots on the far left complained that Biden was “funding” Israel. “Genocide Joe” and all that. Turns out, federal law compelled the federal government to supply/sell Israel certain weapons and at certain rates. Biden (and Trump) literally cannot stop doing it. It’s been in every NDAA since I cared to look at them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalko
  12. He can try. Unless the city/state is actively aiding and abetting, he has no case. The cities/states nothing is not a crime. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. I’m going to blow your mind: They authorize discretionary funds for them. Just like military units have funds that they can use for a wide variety of purposes. Recreation, for example. Surely this isn’t a surprise to you? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. There is no federal law that compels cities or states to help with immigration enforcement. Again, 10th Amendment. Pretty simple stuff. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...