Husker_Du

who published that headline? has to be an MSM outlet.

so you're not just dumb, and have a horrible sense of extrapolating a landscape, but you're uninformed, too. i told you multiple times that this is the policy. it's on the books. it's law. good god, there's no help for your kind.

i don't know this for sure but... new (and used) gas engine prices are through the roof. i would have to assume the mandates of producing electric cars and the lack of market (and losing billions) have made Ford et. al. to recoup those losses on gas engines. of course the last few years there's been constant talk of supply chain issues and lack of computer processors, but i'd be surprised if they didn't try to offset EV losses by raising gas job prices.

precisely.

there's nothing wrong with finding solutions to problems. but the current EV industry is not a solution. the entire industry is powered by fossil fuels - the machines they use to mine the rare elements, and the outlet they plug in to charge. and the land is raped in the process. nothing about it makes sense. they use energy from fossil fuels to produce a vehicle with short range that runs on fossil fuels. there's a reason why Sweden just announced they were breaking w/ the rest of the world and building all nuclear. it's cleaner and cheaper. EV is currently a joke. you want to talk about a failing market - check the reports from almost all major auto companies P&L on EV's.

I wouldn't call you a bigot. But this is the product of being woke: hurting the people you say you want to help.

gotcha. i didn't realize their conference was this week.

i'll try explaining 'woke' to you... it's a person who disregards clear and obvious sensibilities and science in favor of some progressive lunacy to A) score brownie points among other likeminded nutbags B) feel good about themselves it's rather simple. you're one of them. it's why you think men and women should play sports together. it's why you like CNN. and it's why you wear a mask alone in your car.

great use of 'dipshit' imo

lmfao. wake up, Junior.

that's bonkers. good pull.

• Low prosecution % • No cash bail for murderers and rapists • Allowed to steal $1000/day • Open air drug dens these are liberal policies. they are actual rules that your nitwit party put in to place. and who do they hurt the most - the needy. if your head is that far under a rock (or up your ass) google Soros District Attorneys

oh, but i do understand. Ban is totally avoiding that it is THE POLICY. what dunce would defend that policy. (Ban, i guess). and you know what... the people that complain that the lower class have so many obstacles are the same people that defend this bullcrap that....guess what...primarily affects the lower class. make it make sense. hey Ban, how do you feel about contributing to the oppression of the most in need, ya slappy.

good god, you're dense. you can't arrest a lightening strike, confucius. you must have taken too many hits to the head from Ronda Rousey.

you're a true gem, Ban. unbelievable. there's a new vid every day of looting. they don't punish anything - including things far worse than shoplifting. these are liberal POLICIES. but yeah, it's fake news and Fox is the purveyor of them. keep your head in the sand, genius.

why is it BRICS week? what am i missing?

i follow JR High very closely. when i said 'prodigy' i meant prior to the Trials and World titles.

NJ prospect

meyer wrestled his whole life. he didn't compete a ton. and, in his first year at Fargo he DNP'd. which is why, when i said in my Cadet Trials two years ago that he was a lock, people lost their heads. he's been a prodigy since middle school.

i was once with a buddy who had a lot of acreage. we went out, he shot a deer. he cleaned it and within 20 minutes we sauteed the loin in olive oil and garlic and ate it. it was unreal.

so Ban is not Absolut. gonna start calling him Smirnoff. or Grey Goose.

1) you mean to tell me that you truly think there are men's and women's sports simply because of locker rooms? (please tell me you were kidding. and if you weren't i'm going to need you to go sit and the corner and think about this for a while.) 2) locker rooms by gender are going by the wayside.

that is a tough downgrade.

you remind this board almost daily that you've been an educator for 28 years, and then also espouse ideas like males and females are physically equal. so why, pray tell, are there genders in sports to begin with? would you like (and would it be fair and better for society) if there were no women's sports and just unisex teams where the best competed together if they are of the ability to make the team? if you answer 'no' to that question, you're contradicting yourself and finally realizing that your outlier approach to this is hogwash. answering 'yes' pretty much reduces women's participation in sports to nothing. so what's your answer?

also, let's not include political stuff on this thread, please just pure crazy people stuff.