Bigbrog

1. Yes...personal choices lead to addiction 2. What the heck kind of question is that?? My question to you is how is domestic abuse a leading cause of homelessness?? Better question is, why would your head go there based on what I said?? I never said personal choice was the ONLY reason for homelessness yet alone said anything about domestic abuse.

1. We never will due to people having free choice and it would be nearly impossible to fix the plethora of other reasons people end up homelessness...ex, drugs and alcohol abuse 2. See No. 1 3. Yes and yes Any additional questions you know the answers to but wanted to sound morally superior in some way??

Funny when way of trying to support someone by listing all the bad things he is in fact responsible for...but than again, look who wrote it

Again...you two have the same tiresome rhetoric...show us/tell us what were in the bills you claim R's voted down...I can 100% guarantee it wasn't JUST for food stamps, or JUST for universal pre-K and health care...and in some cases it usually means taking money from some other place that a certain group of politicians think is more important to the American people and thus vote something down they feel people don't want/need.

What Jimmy said. Tell me exactly everything that was in those bills. Should I post the laundry list of bills the democrats have voted down and make the assertations you have?? Again...BOTH SIDES DO IT!

Wow...you clearly are so blinded by your partisan glasses. THIS is the problem with our politics today...people with this freaking attitude. First off if you truly think democrats are the only side wanting to get things done and never block legislation than you sir are not work even arguing as most 11 year olds are smarter than you. Hint...BOTH sides play politics when it suits them. Has always been that way; however, in the past, when they were behind closed doors they knew what good/healthy debate was, and then compromise, and then go have drinks and smokes at the bar....not nowadays, or at least there isn't much of it and when it does happen our stupid MSM doesn't report on it because it doesn't get them viewership or clicks. And you simple minded people eat that divisiveness up.

Wow...the resident whackadoodle that tries to act morally superior by throwing around words like "oppression", "acceptance", "bigotry", "help the unfortunate", "privilege" etc. actually posted this....unbelievable. Man you are so full of s#$% and the biggest privileged/oppressive/bigot on these boards.

On a different note...did you all hear what the VP said about the report...yep..."it's political"...she is beyond not smart...our "leadership" is a freaking laughingstock

When I first read the tweet it didn't even cross my mind that Goetz was praising Putin, but after you said something I went back and re-read it...and nope still didn't think he was praising him. LOL...rassin you! Truly I didn't take it as praise but can see how someone may have thought that...especially if they didn't like Goetz.

Wow

I always liked Dan Crenshaw when I have heard him speak; however, I have not heard anything he has said recently.

Agreed with this; however, their post have never once been in support of the people of Israel.

I think there are people on here that don't provide anything to the topic at hand or the argument except to try and nitpick peoples post. If you don't feel like UB and the new guy are being antisemitic then say it and explain why. To me, if someone constantly bashes Israel without any sort of shade thrown at the terrorist organization who started this whole mess, yes, that person could be considered an antisemite. It'd be like someone constantly bashing the law enforcement groups that raided a bunch of KKK compounds after the KKK did horrific acts of violence to innocent minorities and then got in a shootout where innocent woman and kids were killed, and that person said nothing about what the KKK cowards did to deserve the raid. Would you think that is fine, and the person bashing law enforcement isn't a racist POS? Funny part is in theory I agree with what you said.

Yeah...I don't get into to much of the legal crap around Trump and little Biden, especially nowadays, but this one interests me.

What state are YOU in....oh wait....

Well...bye

Agreed...and I am sure I have contributed to it. Hard not responding some of UB's take on things.

Did you create an account just to be an antisemite??

So who cares what Hamas did/does....and attack the people that were ATTACKED!! Another antisemite!

Sometimes these arguments become so tiresome when people bog them down with ASSumptions and semantics. I have not read on here that anyone said, including me, there shouldn't have been and shouldn't be amendments to the constitution. What I hear people say is that the basis of it and the intent of it should be the first priority and changed, following the prescribed process to do so, instead of just throwing it out the window because of some political ideology and people thinking "it doesn't fit any longer". It does fit in its intent and shouldn't be changed without extreme vetting and interrogation.

What book did you read again that makes you think you know more than everyone else??

People...including me...have told you over and over why stacking the SCOTUS is stupid and un-needed. And don't change what I said or claim I said something I didn't...I never said that the constitution was infallible? It is an amazing document that has been amended for things that were really horrible things and deemed no longer acceptable in our society. Because you don't like the political lean of the current SCOTUS you want to change everything. But if it was leaning the other way I bet you would be arguing why it shouldn't ever change.

It's been amended moron!!! Tell us again how smart you are....

You are a moron...what a freaking stupid question...