Bigbrog

definitely a LOL...sad part is you won't LOL at the left side who does exactly the same thing

Wow...like I said...pathetic @uncle bernard What's just as pathetic as the crap you post is that you try and lecture others on reading comprehension...classic projection. Isn't there a new and trending "issue" you should get back to protesting??

Wow...you actually are pathetic

At least you admit you are full of

which are....???? Also, you think TPTD's doesn't contain factual errors??

What the?? Not sure what you are trying to say here, but if you are just trying to pick a fight with someone you think is a Trumper and upset over the verdict you may want to look somewhere else. By the way, you accusing people of being a trumptser and being brainwashed by Fox news works both ways pal...may want to look in the mirror to see if you are in fact what you accuse people of, just on the other side.

Funny all the accusations of people being angry and it seems the only ones that are are the TDS crowd. Anywho, I have a feeling this will turn into a nothing burger and will carry on for years in appeals courts until one day, when it isn't convenient anymore it will just "go away". I did laugh at the post about someone saying, wow someone in NY actually got convicted of a crime...crazy how once again people don't see this as being a political hit job...but oh well

What evidence do you have that it won't?? Will Israel be much safer if Humas is gone...10000% Did we, or other militaries eliminate ALL of the terrorist groups you list? I'll take Al Q, we DRASTICALLY put a damper on their terrorist organization...aka, it worked. ISIS, we can't complete illuminate them unless we want a full out war with Iran. Have we impacted them...absolutely!! As for what you advocate, doing nothing does exactly that...NOTHING!! But let's the terrorists know that they can do whatever they want. People like you and UB tend to equate Israel and the US with what terrorists are and that is abhorrent that you two do that.

@VakAttack @WrestlingRasta @NM1965 You all don't realize you are arguing for my point which I have stated many times...you can't say it isn't political and then blame the R's for making it political. You are mixing up two distinct things here...my personal feelings on Trump and the validity of him being guilty if the jury finds him that way...I'll repeat, if he is guilty then he should be found guilty by the jury. There, that is one topic off the table...I am in complete agreement with you all that he should pay the price if he did the crime...as I feel anyone should. The other topic of this being political and the justice system being applied unequally...you all are in fact arguing for my point while trying to spin it in your head that I am wrong because you all think I am this huge R...I am not. Anyway, it doesn't matter if it is an R or an D...it happens on both sides...in this case it is happening to an R...a very big R (Ex President and current R candidate for the next election). I have never once made any indication of if I think Trump did it or didn't do it, I have never once reiterated what the news media spews, so all those things you try to accuse me of are nothing but ASSumptions and quite frankly weak. I'll reiterate my points again...one, if Trump did in fact break the law he should pay the prices...that point stands on its own. Point two, currently we are witnessing one of the biggest political applications of justice we have ever seen...knowing that it has and does happen on both sides. I for one am sort of okay with it really as I think justice should be applied equally...and if justice truly were to be applied equally, I have a feeling A LOT of presidents, current and past, would be in front of judges and juries.

You choose not to see it being applied unequally because you want them to go after Trump. And the application of equity has many different facets...one being wealthy versus not wealthy, and another being political in nature. I am speaking to the political side of things...which you tried to discount by comparing a senator to a president and saying the jury determines guilt. Not to mention the massive implication this trial (and others upcoming) has on both our political system and our justice system. It is almost like you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth by saying things that indicate the justice system is blind (in Trump's case), but then turn around and admit it isn't (rich vs poor). You are actually making my original point.

THIS!

Do you honestly think this is the same thing as an ex-president who is also running for president again?? Come on!

I have no problem if Trump is found guilty if he is guilty. For me it is a matter of applying our justice system in a consistent matter. Take away the names of the big players in politics right now, it is blatantly clear...to me...that the justice system is NOT being applied consistently...and it is clear...to me...it is based on political affiliation. And because it is political, depending on what side of the isle people lean, people will either justify the inequity of the application of the justice system (aka. deny it is happening), or they will question every single move by the justice system.

She is tacitly endorsing getting rid of a terrorist organization...because she does want peace. With Humas around there will never be peace in that area.

Awesome!!!

Yet you constantly lie and don't care. shameless

Yeah...everyone knows that! Meanwhile me

Why is this so hard for people to understand??

Are you quoting Hamas??

I'll bite...everything you just bellyached over in your babbling post are things you yourself and your echo chamber have also done. Almost everyone on here, especially the most vocal, which includes you and me, have participated in heated debates, name calling, divisive rhetoric, painting a perception of hating the person you are arguing with, etc. It makes me laugh that you still can't see that, and then post that gem of a post. This is a message board, this isn't "real life", people post things they probably wouldn't dare say to someone face to face, they post things to get a reaction, they debate fiercely, etc...that's it. I enjoy debating with people that think differently than myself...I truly do enjoy learning different perspectives. What makes it go down the tubes, and I am just as guilty as the other person, is when people make stupid over-arching assessments of people who they know absolutely nothing about, make a post mean something other than what it says, think they are smarter than the other people, make it personal, or ask a million nonsensical questions in every post. Imagine if you would have said..."I have not posted in a while and I realized that my actions may have caused....the rest of your post...and wondering what we could do to try and eliminate some of that from happening and just have good, spirited debates about things we disagree on?" But you didn't do that, and you wouldn't, hence my post. Does that answer your question??

Nothing Burger....these types of things happen all the time during war. Besides what is wrong with wanting to finish a terrorist organization?

Is it me or could there not be a more ironic/hypocritical post than what TPT just posted?? I literally started laughing out loud. Crazy how some people have ZERO self-recognition, introspection, or social EQ.

What is funny is for people to actually think, as a country, we would ever ban contraception. SMH But then again they are the same people that somehow played mental gymnastics in their brains to try and convince themselves that Trump said he would ban them. Wow

Braves/TPT/Uncle are the type of people that advocate for the perpetrator of a crime and against the police, all the while having complete disregard for the victim or victims...anyone with that backwards thinking isn't worth arguing with.

I think this is one of those cases where both sides of the argument here can be true...yes it is standard procedure that the FBI is armed and ready to use deadly force when executing a raid/search warrant. And it also can be true that the "way" the FBI executed the raid/search warrant wasn't consistent with other very similar situations.