Bigbrog

The issue here is that both sides do the same stuff...sometimes I think what the D's do is "worse" and sometimes I think what the R's do is "worse"...in this case I think what the D's want to do is "worse", that's my opinion and I gave my reasons why...my mistake for thinking you were saying what the R's did was bad and what the D's want to do is okay.

AKA...whatever the D's do = Good! Whatever the R's do = Bad! Got it!

First way to understand that the two are different is to remove one's bipartisan glasses. Second, there is a big difference replacing justices than creating seats to gain the majority. The first is "normal" in the process of things and is just unfortunate timing for the other party (to me this is like the person who does a lay-up at the end of a basketball game when the game is already won instead of just running out the clock)...the other is one party purposely creating a majority (changing the rules of the basketball game until you win the game). By the way, I don't think court packing will happen any time soon anyway so sort of a moot point.

Agree with your last statement about the minority ruling the majority in this country. But about court packing, I guess I don't see any sort of comparison in what the "R's" did in terms of the SCOTUS, they filled empty seats...did they maybe not follow "norms" of doing so with an outgoing president...sure...have no problem for them being critiqued or criticized for that, but it wasn't "against the rules"...it was part of the "game". Creating more seats so that one party can have the majority is a totally different thing. I guess me personally, one is way worse than the other.

You just used your own hypocrisy to try and show that someone else is being a hypocrite?? Wow...can't make this stuff up.

No one needs to...you do well enough on your own...and all of a sudden you become quite when called out on your bipartisan hypocrisy.

Also @Mike Parrish I'll admit it...you are right...I was "arguing" the Stormy Daniels thing and not the last link you posted...my bad.

Thanks...you proved my point...my guess is in 2015 - 2022 you were like "Nothing to see here!!"...so you are doing the exact same thing the people you can't stand did! Do you not see the hypocrisy? And nice try on the last part...first I am neither a D nor an R....also there is a big difference in that there wasn't some rogue republican DA trying to bring charges against Hillary after she was already investigated and no charges were filed against her. But continue to see it from your bipartisan perspective.

SEE!!! SEE!!! He clearly isn't guilty!! Legal drama surrounding Trump reaches a fever pitch | CNN Politics See how stupid doing that is @Mike Parrish

Okay if you say so...

Honestly, first off, I couldn't care less if Trump gets arrested or not. What I do care about is using the justice system as a political hit job...again, regardless of the person being "investigated" has a "D" or an "R" after their name. To me, this case HAS been investigated...a couple times. Why weren't charges brought then? Point is, charges weren't brought. It is quite obvious the lawyer at the time, is a whackjob/narcissist/conman (maybe more so than Trump), and the other person involved...well, we all know who she is, so both stories wouldn't hold up in any court? Even if she was paid off, there are far worse cases this DA isn't focused on right now. And so you can go ahead and use the overly emotional "extremely serious" to describe this...that is your opinion. My guess is your words used to describe a case like this would be MUCH different if it was someone who has a "D" after their name...not to mention we wouldn't be seeing link after link posted saying "SEE!!!" "SEE!!" "GUILTY!!" But that is your schtick so keep on keeping on. Is that specific enough??? My guess is you'll nitpick a misspelling here or there, say something I said was "Hyperbole" and at the same time call me some juvenal/immature name.

If you say I don't then you live in that world bud.

Come on Mike...you are better than this...poles mean nothing....hasn't that been established the last two election cycles...not to mention Desantis hasn't even announced he is running. Doesn't matter, I stated my opinion and that doesn't change. Like I said, my only hope is we are voting for someone other than Trump or Biden.

What...someone misled attorneys...please say it aint so!

Packing the court is just an extension of poor losers...geeze people get real. By the way, I think Trump's "followers" is extremely low at this point and if the R's put out the right candidate I feel like they have a chance against Biden...a lot of my D friends do not like Biden or want him to run again. Here's to hoping both the R's and D's put out high quality candidates as opposed to Biden and Drump!!

I'm a firm believer in innocent until proven guilty, but with AJ...come one...the guy is a ticking time bomb if he isn't locked up. Head scratching move if Iowa brings him and the middle brother in. I agree with what someone said in that the younger one should stand on his own and be judged completely separately, and as of this moment he seems like a good recruit.

Man you anti-religious folks are dense...do you not get that the islamic faith insults all other faiths in it's whole concept. And vice versa. That is why they are...get ready for it...DIFFERENT religions!! A lot of you are like "Karen" sitting at the park calling out things that are "bad" when you know nothing about the very thing you are calling bad.

Parris

I really hope this is true. I can't stand Iowa, but Lee has been one of my favorite wrestlers to watch the last few years and he is a once in a generational talent, but him pulling out after the loss really bugged me...not to discredit what he has already accomplished, but just wish he would have finished out the tournament.

So disappointing...once again people getting their undies in a bunch about someone's faith. Not to mention him saying something that non-islamic/anti-religious folks find offensive or disparaging in some way. Ironic really.

That would be a fun meeting! I may be going to the US Open. And I agree...we all probably have a heck of a lot more in common then differences.

Spot on...and it is idiocy that I stoked the fire

Wow...the stark contrast of your "objectivity" towards Biden and his kin compared to Trump and his is blinding...but not unexpected.

Right before I logged on this morning...I said to myself..."I bet Mikey and Plas are creaming in their shorts right now because of the possibility of Trump getting arrested!" And I was right! I figured the idiot would have gotten arrested for something else other than the old hush money crap.

Anyway, back to topic...so is marijuana addictive or not??