First to the subject of the thread: The objection is to ‘voting’ for multiple promotions/appointments without voting, by merely not objecting. That is just brainless, mindless approval without knowing or examining the qualifications of the candidates. That’s how you get people asking: “How did this happen?” If the recently imposed, not voted on, policy of spending taxpayers dollars on abortion is not rescinded, then me and Tommy Tuberville object.
Quality, affordable health care might be best achieved by removing the limits on how many medical school students are allowed. Based on results from the countries that have government run health care, that’s not the answer.
Fair elections, with voter IDs, paper ballots and hand counting, absentee/mail in ballots upon request and verification of absence or handicap would result in higher voter confidence in our elections. Similar to France’s elections, where their results come in before the next morning.
Money out of politics could mean either elections or legislation. Sometimes the biggest spenders lose (see hiliary clinton). Military and government officials moving to lobbyist positions, and lobbyist spending can be detrimental, but it’s not always. Less money and more virtuous members in government, less bureaucracy and agency, would help sustain liberty and cut spending.