Selection criteria for an at-large includes 'next man up' in it.
Meaning if your conference had 8 allocations and you were the 9th or if it had 10 allocations and you were the 11th or 5 allocations and you were the 6th, etc.
Meaning whatever your conference has for allocations, they must place at least one (1) spot higher.
If 13e has 9 allocations then they will at least place to 10th.
The immortal Mikey Carr, Illinois, up against Gilcher, Indiana, on Mat 4. Gilcher looks at least a weight class larger on this four screen B1G+ display.
This ended up being fake news.
Gallagher had nothing for him.
It was impressive, really. 8-0 Major for Siebrecht w/ well over two minutes of riding time. An obvious huge skill disparity.
Lamer, Michigan, up on Miller, Maryland, 3-1 midway through the 2nd on Mat 1.
Mattin, Michigan, up on Olivieri, Rutgers, 4-1 midway through the 2nd on Mat 4.
Got over 1 minute of RT before Bergeland got the escape.
4-3 after the 2nd. Hamdan should choose neutral to start the 3rd.
He doesn't. Low match IQ. RT was 1:01.
Hamdan, Michigan State, up 4-2 on Bergeland, Minnesota, after the 1st period.
He is avoiding keeping the match on the mat, which is Bergeland's strength in the match.