Idaho

Tolentino, Crosby and Olguin not wrestling.

Is the stream on Big10+ up and running yet? Mine is having problems

Joey Davis - Two of his seasons are on wrestestat - He has wins over Wilps in 2014 who finished 7th at the D1 NCAA and 2nd the next year. He has a win over Rasheed who went on a few years later to finish 7th. I have no doubt Davis would have been a multiple AA in D1 and possibly a 1x champ. I think that was his ceiling. Certainly not undefeated. A far cry from Cael. LeVesseur - As mentioned - transferred out of Minnesota mainly to play football as well. It's hard to find individual match/season results for him and who he matched up with at tournaments that were D1 AA or starters. I think he would have been a multiple AA as well. Would not. have been undefeated in D1. I believe Bertin and Johnston were the finalists at 157 his senior year in D1. Cael- No comments necessary.

Being reported Teemer and Haines to miss all-star due to injury.

Yep Men's Freestyle division, there are six UWW weight categories with a +2 KG allowance: 57 KG, 65 KG, 74 KG, 86 KG, 97 KG, and 125 KG.

Agree.... I don't see Larkin at 141. He has stepped it up a level lately. Can Ramos make 141?

See how I am responding directly to your quote...that's how that works. So instead of pissing match, how about a real answer to the actual appropriate punishment for athletes betting on their own school? If you answer is to compare to Harbaugh, who is a coach and did not have the same infraction, then so be it. 3 duals?

Read above so you understand the question and answer the question that was not even posed to you.

Jim Harbaugh wasn't an athlete betting on his own school sports, his staff violated the sportsmanship policy of the B10.... so let's start over so you can understand the question: What would be the appropriate punishment for a student athlete who was betting on their own school sports?

What would be the appropriate punishment for a student athlete who was betting on their own school sports?

Good find! Portella is a true freshman right? If so, he has used his 5 matches to preserve his redshirt. I wonder what they do there if Eichens doesn't go until second semester. Would be a waste to get a half season to burn your redshirt.

haha... not offended at all...rarely am.....and yes, knowing you, I was expecting a way more entertaining answer. I am disappointed. Get it together man.

So what is the difference between saying "It's coinflip as to who will win" and "I don't necessarily consider it a toss-up." ? Aren't coin flip and toss up the same thing?

Very logical

Our training methods are unique and reminiscent of Rocky IV.

I believe we started as OSUW ... then it morphed to wOSU in the realm of tOSU.... personally I prefer OSUW... should Ok State be scOSU?

True! I really wish wOSU would start up a program. They have some tough ladies at the RTC and Nate Engel is a proven coach.

Tom avoided questions by being very adamant to ask the right questions to the right people. Has Tom even answered the questions about the things he had/has control over? I have not seen his response as to why he allowed athletes to sign off on a waiver that they had been trained/educated on betting when they did not attend. Has he addressed this?

I agree - it will be a good match. It's not so much the belief that Arnold will be "in the match" as it is that WIttlake is washed up and Arnold is a lock.

You are correct, he is now healthy and at his correct weight. Who was the last college AA that Arnold beat? Sell me on Arnold being an AA this year.

That's an expensive hotdog and soda ....

Shock the Hawk!

I thought Ech looked big for 149... he will be the biggest 141 in the country.

12 years ago - probably time to give that one up. If it happens this season, then revisit. Being drilled into the program does not mean each wrestler will follow it - it means the program did their due diligence. Did Iowa drill it into their program to follow the laws/rules/guidelines of betting? If you are allowed to skip the meeting and sign off on it, I think that's a good indication.