Jump to content

red viking

Members
  • Posts

    9,913
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by red viking

  1. Doesn't matter if it was negotiated by unions or not. The govt entity promised it and put it in writing. Too bad so sad. Taxpayers need to fund it. F the wingers raiding pension funds. Lock those MFers up. Taxpayers need to pay what was promised. Case closed.
  2. Yes, the scumbag Republican wingers. No way in hell those pieces of garbage are gonna get away with raiding pension funds without consequences. The taxpayers need to pony up when that happens, unless the govt entity itself goes bankrupt. You're a scumbag P.O.S. for wishing that the govt takes away promised benefits to workers. Its basically the same as your former company just cutting off all retirement benefits to you. Too bad so sad, we're taking the money all back. I WOULD 110% LOVE TO LOCK YOU UP YOU SELFISH SCUMBAG POS!!!!! Can't wait for the vengeance to start coming for people like you. I'll have zero pity for whatever happens to you extremists and terrorists.
  3. Your'e changing the subject. Whether unions should be allowed is a 110% completely different subject. If the govt entity agrees to a certain compensation package for workers, they need to stand by it. It doesn't matter if they made the agreement with the union or not. If some corrupt winger politicians raids a pension fund, it isn't the unions responsibility to replenish it. Are you that dumb that you don't realize that, ultimately, the money still needs to come from the workers. The unions can't print money you idiot.
  4. Once again, it's all about you, isn't it. There are a lot of people out there that still rely on physical mail. You selfish winger pieces of garbage don't care though.
  5. Yes; find better people to manage the funds. We're all in agreement with that. Better yet, don't allow the scumbag wingers to raid pension funds. But if they do, there are consequences and the workers need to be made whole. If you agree to pay somebody, you pay them. It doesn't matter whether you made the agreement with a union or not. The workers accepted jobs based upon a promised compensation package.
  6. It will be a lot more expensive to have FedEx deliver the mail so you're 110% wrong.
  7. Oh, yes it sure as hell is. The mismanagement of the funds isn't the fault of the workers. If the politicians raid a pension fund, the money needs to be replenished. If they signed a contract to be compensated a certain amount, the state/feds/municipality needs to pony up. It's basically illegal in most places to renig like that, and a moral outrage, but then again you aren't a person of integrity so this doesn't surprise me one bit.
  8. He needs to gut the military by 90%, like the fat bloated pig it is.
  9. Yes, that was part of it, that wingers are obviously losing by a lot. The actual metaphor used doesnt really matter. Is "bitch slapped" better?
  10. Partially agree w @Rassling
  11. Sure. Problem wasnt as bad back then though. The pedo needs to fix it but hiding the epstein files is more important.
  12. Their deficit has gone up though in the past 2 years. Partially due to trumpflation.
  13. Early voting has typically favored dems though. A lot of republicans think it should be banned. Urban areas always offer it but a lot of rural areas ( typically winger country) dont. I do agree that the wingers are gonna get scorched, but not necessarily based on early voting.
  14. They can make the changed right now but refuse to. Its that simple.
  15. that's who controls those entities right now. Welcome to reality.
  16. Sure. the 6-day per week mandate isn't within their control either though, so blame the politicians; not USPS.
  17. The politicians and political entities are forcing them to run a deficit. It's that simple.
  18. Not necessarily. I've actually said I prefer raising the SS taxes. If not, then cut the expenses as a last resort. I'd cut social security to rich people that don't need it first and foremost. I just want us to get rid of deficit that we have. I DEFINITELY never said get rid of social security completely. Not even close.
  19. It's gotten a lot worse after COVID. Dems may have played a part in it, but either way, they simply need to raise their fees. It's not complicated. They have had limited authority to do that, so yes, I'm blaming politicians and the political PRC instead of the USPS themselves.
  20. How can you justify promising somebody a certain pension as part of their compensation package and then taking it away from them after they've earned that (delayed) compensation? i can tell you who. A typical, morally bankrupt winger. If you don't like their pension, then don't offer it, but you'll probably have to offer higher wages to make up for it. You're not going to get people to work for much if any lower wages than they already do, unless you want to hire bums off the streets and have a sky-high turnover rate. But don't promise a pension and then take it away years down the road. That's typically illegal, but if not, morally bankrupt.
  21. Those are actually the reasons why they need to increase their fees. There's nothing stopping the federal govt from doing that. It boils down to the fact that the wingers control all 3 branches of govt and between the pedo-controlled PRC and Congress, the USPS isn't being given the authority to do that. It's a wonderful life when your political party can force an agency to get by on very limited funding while mandating they continue to perform the status quo services and then also blame them they can't balance their budget. But the dumb wingers will drink whatever Kool Aid their propaganda machine feeds them.
  22. 110% b.s. I knew a couple mailmen and they busted their butts. One of them quit becsuse it wasnt worth the crap pay. They should raise their fees to match expenses, regardless of # of delivery days, employee pay, or drop in volume. Its very simple. Money coming in needs to match money going out.
  23. For those of you that don't think that Trump will try to make some sort of BS claim (regardless of whether there's any actual evidence) about a "rigged" election and then take some drastic action to prevent the Dems from taking back control of Congress, I have a glacier to sell you. The question for me is, how far will he go. Will it be as minor (only relative to expectations) as countless lawsuits and instigating riots (e.g. Jan 6) or will he do something even more drastic like try to declare a national emergency and/or marshall law? Let me know your thoughts, or if you're really dumb enough to think he'll accept the results.
  24. That's a 110% lie. They only get to run it partially, and to the extent allowed by Israel, which isn't much.
  25. This is a classic problem with the wingers. You've literally gone off the deep end to the right. It isn't Bush that's changed; it's the entire winger movement. Complete lunatic whack jobs.
×
×
  • Create New...