Jump to content

ionel

Members
  • Posts

    14,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    182

Everything posted by ionel

  1. Why did he mention only Sanderson in the thread title (the topic). Let's just agree to agree that the OP was off topic on his first post.
  2. If/when the Ferrari are done done gone will Jimmy move to the women's volleyball forum? Is @BobDole on username suicide watch for JC?
  3. But the OP was referring specifically to 184 & 197 and Cael. Sure some turdbiscits went off the rails on the very first reply and then the thread author chased after him. But this is still a thread gone off the rails and unfortunately an attempt to repair the tracks has failed.
  4. Maybe all need to re-read the OP.
  5. I'm saying he doesn't win a match.
  6. But did he ever wrestle D1 @ 184 or 197?
  7. The great state of Illinois follows that plan with most of their governors.
  8. When do you get on the cruise?
  9. If congress won't support it we will just vote them out of office, its simple. Somehow we got Presidential term limits thru the process but maybe we the people were smarter back then. Is it ok to say maga to this?
  10. There should be no limits on eligibility years. If a kid wants to stay in college till he/she is 55 who is the NCAA to say otherwise. Somebody needs to sue.
  11. Never gonna happen.
  12. Hey now ... this is my "assumption" not yours.
  13. But he did, he was still eligible to wrestle another year and chose not to.
  14. I always assumed if Hutton had a different ref finals Jr year he would've won thus no one would've cared about Cael and Penn St would still only have one title.
  15. did Mocco win anything?
  16. Yes Well Uetake might have something to say about that. BTW: thought this was a Sanderson 184/197 thread, what happened?
  17. Who is this we, who had the power to vote Nancy P out in California? Perhaps it only takes a small southern California fly to guarantee such?
  18. Darn it, knew I shouldn't have quit.
  19. I'd like to get @PortaJohn's input here, he might have better data.
  20. Not really. Take for example the good senator Bob Dole. The state of Kansas doesn't have a lot of power and influence only 6 reps in the House but of course 2 Senators. But when you've got a senator with as much seniority and experience as Dole you'd be crazy to replace him with a new freshman GOP senator. Look at where the state is now. And when Dole was senator they weren't getting stupid wealthy off of serving. Just like NIL its a completely different ballgame now regarding the money. But if you had term limits, let's say two term for senate, then you are always looking for the new one to bring up and no state is getting these crazy out of balance old guy/gal power positions.
  21. Will be interesting to see their schedule.
  22. I gave up, what did they have for dessert?
  23. Plenty of folks are offended by both and there are good candidates in both parties. By not having term limits everything is controlled by the old long timers. The system ain't working the way it was designed, govt got too big and too much power controlled by those who have been there longest. Look what happened to Bernie and Tulsi. Of course if we could each find our own secluded wood shack with a fire pit and endless supply of fresh meat & Red Stripe then we wouldn't have to worry about this crap.
×
×
  • Create New...