Mike Parrish
-
Posts
2,306 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Teams
College Commitments
Rankings
Authors
Jobs
Store
Everything posted by Mike Parrish
-
I've been looking at this topic for a while on the women's side. In 2015, this was the ASICS All American scene. https://www.teamusa.org/USA-Wrestling/Features/2015/July/16/ASICS-names-2015-Girls-High-School-All-American-Team Only 6 of them are still wrestling out of 72 entries on this list.
-
Also, companies with large cash reserves typically go on M&A sprees during these times.
-
Montana is trying to outdo the rest of the red states
Mike Parrish replied to Mike Parrish's topic in Non Wrestling Topics
Minnesota says, "Hold my beer!" https://friendlyatheist.substack.com/p/mn-lawmaker-schools-must-teach-kids -
Who on this board was the worst wrestler?
Mike Parrish replied to Jimmy Cinnabon's topic in College Wrestling
My daughter figuratively pats me on the head whenever I reminisce about my wrestling 'career'. Thankfully, I still outweigh her so she has to tread lightly. -
Doesn't look like it.
-
The costs associated with traveling to these tournaments dwarf the prize money. Luckily, club teams and USAW pick up that portion.
-
The pigeonholing of which people within the GOP's bent to destroy Social Security said what at what time is tedious. If you want to have a conversation, lets have a conversation. If you want to strut around splitting hairs, I'll just ignore you.
-
Do you honestly think a significant portion of the employers will change their payroll policies and programs to facilitate for SS/MC tax avoidance on the part of their employees? I contend the relationship between income cap removal/limit and additional revenue collection is linear or near enough so to not matter.
-
Top 3 placers. $5K for first.
-
Timely
-
They matter, but they're less bound to reality. "Please attend our ranking tournaments!"
-
Maybe you could show how this particular example, eliminating the income cap on SS/MC taxes, isn't a linear relationship?
-
Or UWW's
-
Moving the goalposts a little there? If you actually want to discuss the issues civilly, stop including the snide commentary.
-
As I said, it's an older document that covered more options. I included a newer document that has newer numbers but not all the options included in the older document. "Raising the current 80,400 limit to 100,000" fixes 26% of the shortfall back when this document was compiled. Extrapolation is a thing.
-
https://time.com/6254832/republicans-sunset-social-security-medicare/
-
Dom Parrish 104-9 in college. Sadly, wrestlestat doesn't seem to cover the women.
-
Senior Nationals is the qualifier for Final X, right?
Mike Parrish replied to VakAttack's topic in International Wrestling
A bunch of information here. https://www.usawmembership.com/usaw_events/2300005602 -
Second page, second row of the table. Look for "Increase wages subject to Social Security tax"
-
I'm multitasking!!
-
It's a terrible idea. Flat out. The GOP has perennially has said they want to cut, freeze, change social security over the past three decades. To argue otherwise is disingenuous.
-
Here's a good breakdown of the options: https://www.actuary.org/sites/default/files/pdf/socialsecurity/votingcard_0801.pdf It's an older article. Here's something more recent https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/03/changes-americans-are-willing-to-make-to-fix-social-security.html Removing the cap entirely, taxed through the 147K-400K range, would likely (can't find the article I found before) eliminate the shortfall entirely. Best I can do while I'm eating ramen.
-
I did share my suspicion, you quoted it directly. I'm happy to discuss this topic. Let's go point by point instead of doing that ole Gish Gallup.
-
'Regulatory capture" is also an everpresent problem in rail.
-
Simply removing the income cap for withholdings makes both programs solvent forever.
