mspart

Fix should come to the tourney as a wild card and face Roman mano a mano!! mspart

Looks like a few folks just haven't wrestled each other yet. That's too bad, It would be nice to see results between these unbeaten. I guess we will have to wait. mspart

OSU put the beat down on the Cardinal. Nice to see success for Pendleton! Kudos to Gurr and Olguin! 125: #12 Kaylor (OSU) DEC #26 Provo (STAN) 3-2 133: #19 Shaner (OSU) DEC #29 DiSario (STAN) 4-2 141: #33 Belton (OSU) DEC Miranda (STAN) 7-5 149: Gurr (OSU) MD #11 Arroyo (STAN) 10-2 157: #11 Cardenas (STAN) DEC Crosby (OSU) 17-13 165: #18 Olguin (OSU) DEC #3 Griffith (STAN) 3-2 174: #21 Olmos (OSU) SV-1 #25 Eischens (STAN) 4-2 184: #6 Munoz (OSU) MD Byers (STAN) 24-13 197: #17 Harvey (OSU) MD #31 Stemmel (STAN) 17-6 HWT: Dixon (OSU) DEC Ming (STAN) 5-2 mspart

You got that right bro mspart

France did and I'm wondering how they got seeded. mspart

Nowhere to go but up. mspart

ADS's opponent was a child. Complained continually about his tricep and it went nowhere. So he acted out. Should have been penalized in my opinion. I have to say that I am impressed with ADS and I didn't think I would. He is scrappy and is working hard. He's had two great tourneys. I still don't like him but whatever he is, it is working for him. mspart

Wow, and they are moving fast!! mspart

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/08/timeline-of-fbi-investigation-of-trumps-handling-of-highly-classified-documents/ Timeline of FBI Investigation of Trump’s Handling of Highly Classified Documents By Eugene Kiely Posted on August 30, 2022 | Updated on February 15, 2023 The FBI on Aug. 8 executed a search warrant at former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property in Florida. A federal judge magistrate signed the warrant after “finding probable cause that evidence of multiple federal crimes would be found” at Trump’s property. A property receipt of the items taken from Mar-a-Lago listed 11 sets of classified records, including four sets labeled “Miscellaneous Top Secret Documents” and one marked as “Various classified/TS/SCI documents,” which stands for “Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information.” In total, the FBI took possession of 18 government documents marked as top secret, 54 marked as secret, 31 marked as confidential, according to a detailed list of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago. That’s in addition to 184 classified documents totaling more than 700 pages that Trump voluntarily provided to the National Archives and Records Administration nearly seven months earlier on Jan. 18. A heavily redacted affidavit filed by the Justice Department in support of the search warrant revealed that 92 of those 184 classified documents were marked as “secret” and 25 were marked as “top secret,” including classified national intelligence further marked to protect the control and dissemination of intelligence sources, methods and activities. The partial redacted search warrant for Mar-a-Lago revealed that Trump is under investigation for potentially violating any of three criminal codes involving the mishandling of classified information. The Justice Department investigation is still in the early stages and more information undoubtedly will come out. For now, we provide a timeline of events, which we will update as warranted. 2021 Jan. 18 — With two days remaining in Trump’s presidency, boxes containing documents are moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago. May 6 — The National Archives makes a request for missing presidential records “and continued to make requests until approximately late December 2021 when NARA was informed twelve boxes were found and ready for retrieval” at Mar-a-Lago, according to the Department of Justice’s affidavit requesting a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago. December — NARA begins to arrange for the documents to be securely transported from Mar-a-Lago to Washington. 2022 Jan. 18 — NARA receives 15 boxes of records from Trump that had been taken to Mar-a-Lago, including “highly classified documents intermingled with other records,” according to DOJ’s affidavit. Jan. 31 — NARA issues a statement that says some of the records it retrieved from Mar-a-Lago “included paper records that had been torn up by former President Trump.” NARA adds, “As has been reported in the press since 2018, White House records management officials during the Trump Administration recovered and taped together some of the torn-up records.” Feb. 7 — NARA issues a statement confirming that it had received 15 boxes of records from Mar-a-Lago in mid-January. “Former President Trump’s representatives have informed NARA that they are continuing to search for additional Presidential records that belong to the National Archives,” the statement says. Feb. 8 — NARA issues a statement that says: “Throughout the course of the last year, NARA obtained the cooperation of Trump representatives to locate Presidential records that had not been transferred to the National Archives at the end of the Trump administration. When a representative informed NARA in December 2021 that they had located some records, NARA arranged for them to be securely transported to Washington. NARA officials did not visit or ‘raid’ the Mar-a-Lago property.” Feb. 9 — The special agent in charge of NARA’s Office of the Inspector General refers the matter to the Department of Justice, according to DOJ’s affidavit. Feb. 18 — The archivist of the United States sends a letter to the House Oversight Committee that says: “NARA has identified items marked as classified national security information” in the materials recovered from Mar-a-Lago. As a result, “NARA staff has been in communication with the Department of Justice.” Trump issues a statement that says, “The National Archives did not ‘find’ anything, they were given, upon request, Presidential Records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act.” April 11 — At the Department of Justice’s request, the White House Counsel’s Office formally transmits a letter asking that “NARA provide the FBI access to the 15 boxes” taken from Mar-a-Lago. April 12 — NARA notifies Trump’s lawyer that it intends to provide FBI access to the 15 boxes of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago in January. April 29 — The Department of Justice’s National Security Division sends a letter to Evan Corcoran, an attorney for Trump, that says access to documents taken from Mar-a-Lago is “necessary for purposes of our ongoing criminal investigation.” “According to NARA, among the materials in the boxes are over 100 documents with classification markings, comprising more than 700 pages,” the letter says. “Some include the highest levels of classification, including Special Access Program (SAP) materials.” The DOJ tells Corcoran it needs access to the documents to assess “the potential damage resulting from the apparent manner in which these materials were stored and transported.” That same day, Corcoran writes to NARA, seeking to delay the FBI review of the documents taken from Mar-a-Lago. Corcoran argues that Trump needs time “to ascertain whether any specific document is subject to [executive] privilege” and have the opportunity “to assert a claim of constitutionally based privilege.” May 1 — Corcoran again asks NARA to delay the FBI review. May 10 — In response to Corcoran’s request for a delay, Debra Steidel Wall, acting archivist of the United States, sends a letter to Corcoran, saying that she “decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege,” and to allow the FBI review to begin as soon as May 12. “The question [of executive privilege] in this case is not a close one,” Wall writes. “The [current] Executive Branch here is seeking access to records belonging to, and in the custody of, the Federal Government itself, not only in order to investigate whether those records were handled in an unlawful manner but also, as the National Security Division explained, to ‘conduct an assessment of the potential damage resulting from the apparent manner in which these materials were stored and transported and take any necessary remedial steps.'” (The letter was first published Aug. 23 on a website owned by journalist John Solomon, who was designated by Trump to serve as his liaison to NARA.) May 11 — Trump’s office receives a grand jury subpoena seeking additional documents “bearing classification markings.” (The subpoena is disclosed in a motion filed by Trump on Aug. 22.) A DOJ attorney also sends a letter to Trump’s lawyer asking for a sworn statement from a Trump representative that any documents provided in response to the subpoena “represent all responsive records,” a Justice Department court filing says. May 16-18 — FBI agents review the 15 boxes retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. They identify “184 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 67 documents marked as CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked as SECRET, and 25 documents marked as TOP SECRET,” according to the DOJ affidavit. May 24 — Trump’s lawyer seeks an “extension for complying” with the subpoena to produce any additional classified documents, according to a DOJ court filing. (The DOJ later granted the extension until June 7.) May 25 — Corcoran, Trump’s lawyer, sends the Justice Department a letter that asserts, among other things, that Trump, as president, had “Absolute Authority To Declassify” government documents, according to DOJ’s affidavit. June 2 — Trump’s attorney tells the DOJ that FBI agents can meet him tomorrow and “pick up responsive documents” from Mar-a-Lago, in the words of a DOJ court filing. June 3 — Jay Bratt, chief of the counterintelligence and export control section in the DOJ’s National Security Division, and three FBI agents visit Mar-a-Lago, where an attorney for Trump presents them with “a single Redweld envelope” containing documents “in a manner that suggested counsel believed that the documents were classified,” according to court filings. The agents also tour a storage room, which DOJ says contained about 50 to 55 boxes. Trump’s attorney tells the government agents that “all the records that had come from the White House were stored in one location – a storage room,” and “there were no other records stored in any private office space or other location at the Premises,” in the words of a DOJ court filing. “Critically, however, the former President’s counsel explicitly prohibited government personnel from opening or looking inside any of the boxes that remained in the storage room, giving no opportunity for the government to confirm that no documents with classification markings remained,” the court filing said. A person identified as the former president’s “custodian of records” hands the government officials at Mar-a-Lago “a signed certification letter” that says a “diligent search was conducted” for “all documents that are responsive to the subpoena.” It adds, “No copy, written notation, or reproduction of any kind was retained as to any responsive document,” the DOJ court filing said. A “preliminary review” of the envelope that Trump’s attorney gave to the government agents “revealed the following: 38 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 5 documents marked as CONFIDENTIAL, 16 documents marked as SECRET, and 17 documents marked as TOP SECRET,” the court filing said. June 8 — Five days after Bratt’s visit, the Justice Department sends Trump’s lawyer a letter saying Mar-a-Lago is not “authorized for the storage of classified information.” The DOJ asks that Trump’s office preserve the documents and secure the room where the documents are stored, according to the DOJ affidavit. June 19 — Trump designates two new representatives to NARA: John Solomon, a journalist, and Kash Patel, a former top defense aide during the Trump administration. June 22 – A lawyer for the Trump Organization confirms to the Justice Department that the company has security cameras near the storage area at Mar-a-Lago, according to a Justice Department court filing. June 24 – DOJ serves a subpoena to a Trump Organization lawyer seeking “[a]ny and all surveillance records, videos, images, photographs, and/or CCTV from internal cameras located on ground floor (basement)” of Mar-a-Lago since Jan. 10, 2022, a Justice Department court filing says. July 6 – In response to the June 24 subpoena, the Trump Organization provides DOJ with a hard drive, according to a Justice Department court filing. Aug. 5 — A federal magistrate judge in Florida, Bruce Reinhart, signs a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago “after finding probable cause that evidence of multiple federal crimes would be found at the Premises,” according to the judge’s order to unseal the affidavit. It would seem that Trump was reluctantly compliant. Everything the Feds asked for Trump's people gave. And then the search warrant was requested. I have to disagree with you Mike on this one. mspart

Hey Mike, How did Dom do? I don't see any news yet. mspart

I didn't know GOATS swim . But yes, that is an amazing accomplishment. mspart

Draws for MFS from themat.com. What happened to Nashon? Not make weight? I was hoping for another match with ADS. U.S. Men’s Freestyle entries 57 kg: Nick Suriano (Sunkist) Vs. Nodirjon Safarov (Uzbekistan), 2021 Asian bronze medalist, 2017 Islamic Solidarity Games bronze medalist, 61 kg: Austin DeSanto (HWC) Vs. Mahmoud Shorbaby (Egypt), 2nd 2019 Ibrahim Moustapha Tournament (Egypt) 65 kg: Pat Lugo (HWC) Vs. Sanzhar Mukhtar (Kazakhstan), 9th in 2022 Tourlykanov Cup (Kazakhstan) 65 kg: Anthony Ashnault (TMWC/NYCRTC) Vs. Shaohua Yuan (China), 2x Senior World Team member, 2019 Asian bronze medalist 65 kg: Joey McKenna (TMWC/PRTC) Vs. Zohier Iftene (Algeria), 2nd 2016 Mediterranean Championships, 2015 All Africa Games champion 70 kg: Cody Chittum (HWC) Vs. Agudamu (China), 9th in 2023 Zagreb Open (Croatia) 70 kg: Tyler Berger (Sunkist/PRTC) Vs. Arman Andreasyan (Armenia), 5th in 2021 and 2022 World Championships, 2021 World Military Champion 74 kg: Vincenzo Joseph (Sunkist) Vs. Luis Barrios Rochez (Honduras) 2017 Central American/Carribbean Games champion, 3rd in 2016 Pan American U20 Championships 74 kg: Josh Shields (Sunkist) Vs. winner of Mitchell Finesilver (Israel) and Abdelkader Ikkal (Algeria) Finesilver – 2x World Team member, 2021 European bronze medalist Ikkal – 2022 African silver medalist, 2020 African U20 champion 74 kg: Joey Lavallee (TMWC/LVWC) Vs. Nuertanbieke Wurenibai (China), 2022 World Team member, 10th in 2023 Zagreb Open (Croatia) 79 kg: Chance Marsteller (TMWC/NYRTC) Vs. winner of Akhmed Mahmoud (Egypt) and Bibarys Nuryllauly (Kazakhstan) Mahmoud – 2nd in 2018 Mediteranean Championships Nuryll – 3rd in 2022 Kunaev Tournament (Kazakhstan), 3rd in 2022 Ion Corneanu (Romania) 79 kg: David McFadden (TMWC/PRTC) Vs. Nasser Sayed (Egypt), no information available 79 kg: Evan Wick (TMWC) Vs. Evsem Shvelidze (Georgia), 5th in 2022 U23 Worlds, 2022 European U23 silver medalist 86 kg: Zahid Valencia (Sunkist) Vs. Sebastian Jezierzanski (Poland), 5th in 2022 Worlds, 2022 European bronze medalist 92 kg: Kollin Moore (TMWC/ORTC) Vs. Miriani Maisuradze (Georgia), 2022 U23 World bronze medalist, 2022 European bronze medalist, 2016 U17 World champion 92 kg: Nate Jackson (NYAC/NJRTC) Vs. Feyzullah Akturk (Turkey), 2022 U23 World bronze medalist, 2022 European champion, 2019 U20 World bronze medalist 97 kg: Morgan Smith (LVWC) Vs. Benjamin Honis (Italy), 2022 World Team member, 8th in 2022 Pellicone Tournament (Italy), wrestled at Cornell 125 kg: Nick Gwiazdowski (TMWC/SCRTC) Vs. Daniel Ligeti (Hungary), 5th in 2010 Worlds, 2022 European bronze medalist 125 kg: Jordan Wood (NYAC) Vs. Robert Baran (Poland), 2016 and 2020 European silver medalist, 2018 and 2022 European bronze medalist, mspart

From themat.com Looks like 2 golds and a couple of 5ths. Molinari just beat up the competition. Blades snuck in there. Good for them! U.S. WOMEN’S FREESTYLE PERFORMANCE 57 kg: Amanda Martinez (TMWC/CWC), dnp/11th LOSS Qi Zhang (China), 11-1, 5:34 62 kg: Kayla Miracle (Sunkist Kids), 5th place WIN Ilona Prokopevniuk (Ukraine), 5-4 LOSS Aisuluu Tynybekova (Kyrgyzstan), 10-0, 3:09 WIN Ameline Douarre (France), 10-6 LOSS Iryna Koliadenko (Ukraine), fall, 2:32 62 kg: Jennifer Page (TMWC/NLWC), dnp/13th LOSS Grace Bullen (Norway), 11-11 criteria 68 kg: Forrest Molinari (Sunkist Kids), GOLD MEDAL WIN Saidy Chavez Figueroa (Honduras), fall, 1:34 WIN Marilyn Garcia (USA), fall, 2:45 WIN Meerim Zhumanazarova (Kyrgyzstan), 6-3 WIN Alex Glaude (USA), fall, 3:28 WIN Koumba Larroque (France), 13-2 68 kg: Alex Glaude (TMWC/BDRTC), 5th place WIN Alexandra Anghel (Romania), fall, 1:43 WIN Soleymi Caraballo (Venezuela), 4-3 LOSS Forrest Molinari (USA), fall, 3:28 LOSS Meerim Zhumanazarova (Kyrgyzstan), fall, 2:57 68 kg: Marilyn Garcia (California), 9th place LOSS Forrest Molinari (USA), fall, 2:45 WIN Saidy Chavez Figueroa (Honduras), 4-2 LOSS Meerim Zhumanazarova (Kyrgyzstan), 12-0, 5:58 76 kg: Skylar Grote (TMWC/BDRTC), dnp/12th LOSS Anastasiia Osniach (Ukraine), fall, 4:19 76 kg: Kennedy Blades (Sunkist), GOLD MEDAL WIN Qian Zhou (China), 11-2 WIN Genesis Reasco Valdez (Ecuador), 4-4 WIN April Medet Kyzy (Kyrgyzstan), 12-1 WIN Juan Wang (China), 6-5 mspart

So malicious prosecution is a thing? You don't say. Thank you for pointing that out Plasi. To Mike's post, I have no idea what that is all about. Maybe the guy is a child molester and maybe not. He got convicted so you would hope the jury got it right. If the defense could not fight a malicious DA, then they did not have much to exonerate their client. You only need to poke holes in the prosecution's case to make it iffy to the jury for acquittal. She could have her son appeal I suppose. But I can't find anything on a google search of his name except his mother's plea. Seems kind of weird. The Vice.com article on the mom says he repeated abused his step daughter. Assuming this is true, the guy should hang by his toenails at the very least. There is no excuse for that and hopefully the girl will not be too traumatized by this. But she probably will which is the horror of such acts. mspart

Chicago pizza sucks. Period. I've never been to Chicago so I should know. Actually this thread has taken on a life I did not expect. Very good posts here and all very informative for the most part. mspart

Is anyone here concerned about these examples? mspart

I've already stated I'm not ok with this. No president upon leaving office should have classified documents. No VP or senator upon leaving office should have classified documents. I think I have been clear on this. What I disagree with is the way FBI chose to get the documents from ex-president Trump. They had on going discussions about the documents, Trump complied with FBI requests. In fact, the FBI knew where to go immediately to get them at Mara Lago because they had been in communication. The warrant was a stunt and not necessary. No ex president has ever been subjected to that before, hence the communications that were on going. And the pictures of scattered papers was beyond ridiculous. Obviously that didn't happen to Biden's garage. No pics extant. If the documents were SO classified, FBI would not have spread them out and take pictures and provide to the media. All a stunt. mspart

Be sure to have bleachbit to wipe the hard drives. msaprt

I heard a joke. Comedian comes to a small town and says he saw a "New York Style pizza place there. That's really funny because when I was in New York last time I saw a (say little town's name such as Duluth) style pizzeria there. Is that funny? Did I pronounce it correctly? Pizzeria, that's how you say it right?" mspart

Gives OSU a chance to wrestle above their seed. Which they don't often do. mspart

Yikes!! mspart

I'm aware of this which is why it is so surprising that his politics trumps his economics. He has left economic analysis at the alter of left wing politics. Astounding really. He never admits he is wrong. If you can find even a few things that he got right, that would be something. https://seekingalpha.com/article/556041-why-new-york-times-economist-paul-krugman-is-partly-right-but-mostly-wrong mspart

There is a lot of "supposing" on Krugman's part. He does not even talk about the boomer situation, the lessening of the labor pool or anything regarding hard facts. He does suggest that we socialize medicine so that: It's not at all hard to imagine that improving the incentives to focus on medically effective care could limit cost growth to well below what the CBO is projecting, even now. The extent of his analysis is to imagine. To imagine that we focus on medically effective care, trigger words meaning rationing of medical care. We need to get rid of as many boomers as we can so that we are not spending so much. There, I just decoded Krugman for you. Assuming nothing changes, SS will be spending more than it brings in in just a few years. Taxes will necessarily have to rise because now the general budget will be paying for SS benefits. Or general budget spending will have to decrease. Or, age of benefit will have to rise. Those are the choices. Krugman's thesis that we don't have to do anything is wishful thinking. He is wrong and common sense tells anyone with thought process that this is true. If we do nothing, SS and Medicare spending will come out of the general budget. If that happens, we either just call it debt, or we raise taxes to pay for it. Or to keep SS solvent, SS taxes will have to rise either by rate increase or by salary increase or raise the age of retirement. Isn't it 72 right now? Seems high really. These are the ways to keep SS alive. Doing nothing just raises the debt. Krugman is probably the last person you want to go to for economic predictions. His win-loss record is pretty low. mspart

Krugman has such a strong history of being correct. https://www.yahoo.com/video/paul-krugman-always-wrong-never-173530058.html mspart

How would it work? Perhaps she has not thought that through really. mspart