There he is. Good morning.
You and I have very different definitions of great tournament guys. A great tournament guy to me is someone who has done it before, not just has the potential to do it.
If you extend your list to 6 then you are including Silas Allred who is ranked 10. That would mean you think there are at least 100 great tournament guys. I do not think that.
I think there are currently 16 great tournament guys and PSU has 4 of them. To be a great tournament guy in my book you need to have made the final. Everything else is a good to middling tournament guy or a guy with the potential to be a great tournament guy. There are a lot of guys with the potential.
But as things stand, if Allred is the 10 or higher seed he has about a 1.1% chance of making the final and a 3.3% of All-American.
How do you figure? Iowa is likely to get all 10 guys to the NCAAs whereas Nebraska is unlikely to qualify at heavy and will have a tough time qualifying all of 133, 149, and 165. Nebraska's range is 6 - 9 qualifiers with 8 probably the most likely.
Roman Bravo-Young will be lucky to all-american this year. Yianni Diakomihalis will lose in the first round before going on a back side heater. And Greg Kerkvliet will forfeit the title match so as not to contradict.
Based on the latest coaches poll (partial poll?) here is how they see the top 10. PSU still on top but vulnerable.
Discuss Iowa fans.
James Bradberry disagrees wuth you.
From The Athletic: "Eagles cornerback James Bradberry admitted to holding Chiefs wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster on a critical third-down play in Kansas City’s game-winning drive in Super Bowl LVII on Sunday."
On two stand alone bets, or two parlays, or two elements of one parlay that has two elements, or two elements of a parlay that has more than two elements? Have you lost on any? We need a full accounting.
I am curious how much money odds makers make on prop bets. I assume it is a lot given how hard I hear them pushed in ads and what I assume are guerilla ads (sports talk radio hosts talking about all their prop bets).
I always find it entertaining that in a sport where every single athlete gets injured at some point in their career, people do not want to attribute missed matches to injury. Entertaining and dumb.
The theory on HR was after he got decked by Tyler Dow he got benched. To say there was disagreement on this point would be to put it mildly.
Given that he has not wrestled in the three weeks since, it has to be injury. "Making a point" for this long would be counter-productive. They will not be running a 165 lber out to wrestle B1Gs and thereby essentially forfeiting the weight, so they need Assad ready. If he is healthy he is getting ready by wrestling. So he must be injured.
I do not. But now I am curious what the most in the TF era is. If you always let the trailing wrestler stay within 14 you could conceivably put up any score.