Wrestleknownothing

Did it ever occur that not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll?

I am Spart-Dan-acus

Speaking of which, who was it that proposed a ducking index on the old board?

Goes to show you how seriously I take that screen name.

In the interest of full disclosure, more than one person has DMed me to share tales of Dan's awfulness and creepiness that I had not experienced personally. So there is that.

I had the opposite. Several years ago my company installed a new bit of software that would transcribe voicemails and send the transcription to your email. It would randomly insert swear words into the transcriptions that were not in the voicemail. We had to turn it off, though I thoroughly enjoyed it.

good point. Fixed.

Pinfall, Pinfall, Pinfall. I can't hear you over the shouts for pinfall.

From 2003 - 2006, Oklahoma State's Jake Rosholt won three NCAA titles. His seeds the three years he won were 10, 2, 4 for a total of 16 and an average of 5.33. Has anyone with multiple titles had a higher average seed than Rosholt? I am willing to count unseeded as the midpoint of the highest seed+1 and the total in the bracket. For example, in a year where seeds only went to 8 and there were 31 wrestlers, an unseeded wrestler would be 20.

I found a bracket on wrestlingstats that used both pin and fall in the same bracket. If it is good enough for Jairus Hammond, it should be good enough for all of us. Pinfall, Pinfall, Pinfall. Attica, Attica, Attica.

Let's start by stating the obvious. NJDan is stubborn, obtuse, fractious, incapable of admitting error, and a bunch of other things. But, so what? While he can be a royal pain in the ass, he is not what I would consider a troll. As a matter of fact, he has some of the attributes that are often prized in discussion forums. He starts topics, he argues with everyone, he doubles down when wrong, but all in all he is pretty harmless. So the question is, should NJDan be banned for being a pain in the ass? I am in the camp that he should not, but reasonable people might disagree. Besides, if we did not have him, who would we feel superior to?

I think I know his new username, but I will refrain from sharing at this point because 1.) I am not certain, 2.) It is not clear to me that he should be banned just because he is a pain in the ass.

yes, in 2016. Ironically only three wrestlers have won a 125 title since the last time PSU won a 125 title, but everyone thinks they cannot figure out that weight. It is just that they are like the field at the weight. No one talks about 141, but until Nick Lee, PSU had never had a champ at 141.

And he averaged 0.26 matches annually over the 91 year history of the tournament

You mis-spelled Nico Megaludis.

Careful. You may get pulled into the landmark lawsuit Dan v. The World.

I think he was making fun of the original question by reversing the premise to show the absurdity

Ultimately, we are all day-today

Eierman's knee injury cost him in his quest for 32. He only got 28 in his 5 years.

30 Boom

That looks like what I think you are describing. There were four championship pigtails, one for each group of 8, that led to four consolation pigtails.

You get a Gold Star

Examine the phrase legal tax dodging.