VakAttack

This doesn't make any sense because we literally saw the 141 lb. match happen, and Bartlett never approached scoring an offensive point. We have not seen either Franek-Haines or even seen Messenbrink wrestle a ranked D1 opponent in Folkstyle.

One more time. Maybe call it lawyerly again?

Post the article again, I'm sure then it will become credible.

The victim can not withdraw the charges, they are not technically parties to a case, they are witnesses. The case is typically the state vs. the individual. They can ask that prosecution be dropped or recant their allegations, but prosecutors get the final call, they have to decide if they feel they can prove the case. They can not. This is true. If the eyewitness was served with a subpoena for trial and then doesn't show up, thus violating the subpoena, you would ask the judge for a mistrial on that basis; you have to have served them, though. Unfortunately it happens a lot. Not really directed at you, but since you used the "innocent until proven guilty" line, I wanted to address that quickly. Innocent until proven guilty only applies to taking somebody's freedom away. People are not "innocent until proven guilty" in any other context, and you see us, in society, not hold to that standard all the time. OJ Simpson. Casey Anthony. Trump and/or Biden right now. You even see it in lesser circumstances like people making judgments on the athletes competing based on our very limited information. People getting fired based off accusations. It's fine. The court of public opinion does not have that standard, nor is it required to. Part of being human is we form opinions. Both statements are incredibly, incredibly false. Ann Coulter's reasoning is terrible and biased, and her research skills are not provable based on what you've offered here. There are many, many twit attorneys.

Geezus this thread. Most of you are just arguing semantics about what constitutes a toss up, other than the good doctors in the thread diagnosing the amount of effect an infection was having at different points of a 12 hour period.

"Nagao has been cleared for drilling" Well this sounds familiar.

For RFK Jr! Weird!

This is, of course, very wrong. I'll follow up later when I'm at my laptop.

The bit lives again.

I promise you, it's ok not to comment on shit you don't know about. He was charged with rape and forcible penetration WITH A FOREIGN OBJECT. So no, the verdicts re not inconsistent.

Oh good. We're referencing Ann Coulter. Quick perusal of her "lawyerly article", GTFOH.

Christ.

Well, I have some bad news if people think that don't happens, lol. However, in a case like this, it would be more likely they were lied to, if the information in the report was false. Obviously they were not direct eye-witnesses themselves.

I think I read no more votes this week in the House. It's Tuesday.

What a Shitshow. Shambles in the House right now, McCarthy has had enough of this shit, he just announced he's not running again.

Asking someone to disprove a negative. It's on the person making the claim to prove it. That said, I don't think it's necessarily inappropriate to discuss the situation, as long as it's couched in the framework that it's speculation. If we're being honest, my first thought when I read the story was that it didn't quite add up; that doesn't mean it's not true, I've had stories that didn't make sense to me end up being true in my line of work

It's not perfect at all, but it's a far better solution with better results than we have here. I'm going to leave the conversation here, not to avoid it, but this is the wrong forum and I don't want to go into a political or political-adjacent debate in a non-political forum. @Barracuda141 I tried to add your post into this one to let you know I wasn't avoiding the discussion, but it wouldn't let me do the multiquote for some reason. People who illicitly deal drugs should face consequences, especially high volume dealers. People who do drugs should receive treatment if they want it, or be left alone, unless they commit an actual crime with victims, similar to how we treat alcohol. ETA: To be clear, Barracuda, this is my opinion on the matter, not me claiming it is a fact. I think the evidence is with me, but it's still an opinion.

The results in Portugal have been staggering, and just another demerit on America's "War on Drugs."

This is not how...existence works.

Whoa, are we really ready to raise the standards around here to those kind of heights? Because I like @PortaJohn!

Minnesota had an alleged drug distribution ring busted, WTF are you even talking about lol.

Honestly I don't know, and I wasn't watching back then to experience it, either. I started watching college wrestling in like 2001ish and got really into it in like 2005. Iowa had that great run w/ Metcalf and Co., but the recruiting wasn't like this.

I wonder if this still remains fun for normal Penn State fans. Not the winning titles on the mat, I'm sure that's great but just how often top recruits pick them. At some point does it become old hat? We've never seen anything like this.

Are there people arguing about what the actual rule is? If there are, count me out of that one. I fully acknowledge that the rule exists and Nelson violated it. Damn, y'all

Still not a thing I said, and an internet forum is not a court room. I tried to keep the syllables to a minimum for you, chief.