Should federal workers be fired for criticizing charlie kirk?

[jross]

47 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Well then he should look up who got Trump elected 

He knows; he is trolling.

[jross]

Just now, headshuck said:

It’s been a real eye-opener. You would think teachers, doctors, nurses, public servants, etc. would pause before they posted under their name on X.

I am surprised at how many there are, but not surprised that they felt the world agreed with them. 

[JimmySpeaks]

15 minutes ago, jross said:

He knows; he is trolling.

That one I’m not so sure.  

Edited 8 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[headshuck]

[red viking]

Getting fired simply for saying that Charlie was an idiot, liar, etc? Simply because he's dead? Celebrating his murder is clearly wrong, but the vast majority of the talk about him from the left, including on here, is not doing that at all. 

Be careful what you wish for, because what goes around comes around. 

Maybe during the next administration we'll fire anybody that criticizes lefty political activists. Or does it only count as bad after they've been assassinated? Is this what you truly want? 

Lots  of problems here with the hypocritical wingers. 

Edited 7 hours ago by red viking

[ionel]

4 minutes ago, red viking said:

Getting fired simply for saying that Charlie was an idiot, liar, etc?

But what did those fired actually say or do? 

[red viking]

1 minute ago, ionel said:

But what did those fired actually say or do? 

Don't know, but many on the right are pushing for this. It will likely happen under this administration (if it hasn't already) and also at other levels of government where wingers are in control. 

[Bigbrog]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

Don't know, but many on the right are pushing for this. It will likely happen under this administration (if it hasn't already) and also at other levels of government where wingers are in control. 

So do you think people should lose their job for celebrating or saying someone deserved to die??

[ionel]

26 minutes ago, red viking said:

This is a lie. Don't know ...

 

15 minutes ago, red viking said:

Don't know, but ...

And this why you don't know it's a lie.  You just throw the lie out there everyother time but you don't know.  

Edited 7 hours ago by ionel

[red viking]

17 minutes ago, ionel said:

 

And this why you don't know it's a lie.  You just throw the lie out there everyother time but you don't know.  

110% true that the extreme wingers are pushing for this. Look it up. 

[red viking]

20 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

So do you think people should lose their job for celebrating or saying someone deserved to die??

Absolutely not, but employers in the pvt sector should have that right and also public sector if their work rules explicitly allow it. 

Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? VERY dangerous slope you're  on there because it's gonna end up going both ways, eventually. Be careful what you wish for. THis is very different from celebrating his death, so I think you're really trying to change the subject here because you don't want to deal with the issue. 

Edited 7 hours ago by red viking

[ionel]

6 minutes ago, red viking said:

 

Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? 

Give us an example or we will just presume it's another lie. 

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, red viking said:

Absolutely not, but employers in the pvt sector should have that right and also public sector if their work rules explicitly allow it. 

Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? VERY dangerous slope you're  on there because it's gonna end up going both ways, eventually. Be careful what you wish for. THis is very different from celebrating his death, so I think you're really trying to change the subject here because you don't want to deal with the issue. 

You seem to change the question from celebrating his death to criticizing quite a bit.   Me thinks that’s on purpose.  

[jross]

Most companies can fire you for no reason at all, let alone behaviors that reflect poorly on their decision to employ you.

[Bigbrog]

13 minutes ago, red viking said:

Absolutely not, but employers in the pvt sector should have that right and also public sector if their work rules explicitly allow it. 

Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? VERY dangerous slope you're  on there because it's gonna end up going both ways, eventually. Be careful what you wish for. THis is very different from celebrating his death, so I think you're really trying to change the subject here because you don't want to deal with the issue. 

I didn't ask if people should be fired for CRITICIZING Charlie, but rather should they be fired for CELEBRATING and/or saying he DESERVED to die??  

[jross]

8 minutes ago, red viking said:

Absolutely not, but employers in the pvt sector should have that right and also public sector if their work rules explicitly allow it. 

Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? VERY dangerous slope you're  on there because it's gonna end up going both ways, eventually. Be careful what you wish for. THis is very different from celebrating his death, so I think you're really trying to change the subject here because you don't want to deal with the issue. 

What is the example of criticizing Charlie that reflect well on the employer?

How does that compare to this story?

Not so long ago the Five Nights At Freddy's game developer (Scott Cawthorn) was cancelled after people found his name as a Republican donor on open secrets (never mind the democrat donations).  There were death threats!

[red viking]

13 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

I didn't ask if people should be fired for CRITICIZING Charlie, but rather should they be fired for CELEBRATING and/or saying he DESERVED to die??  

You're changing the subject. That's completely different, and I can see an argument for that, but depends upon the job and the associated contract and work rules. Not much more to say than that. 

The constant wingers deflections are unreal and cowardly. 

[red viking]

11 minutes ago, jross said:

What is the example of criticizing Charlie that reflect well on the employer?

Talking about federal government. This is another winger deflection. 

[Bigbrog]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

You're changing the subject. That's completely different, and I can see an argument for that, but depends upon the job and the associated contract and work rules. Not much more to say than that. 

The constant wingers deflections are unreal and cowardly. 

How am I changing the subject given I asked the question??  I was looking for more clarity on your stance.  So your answer to my question is you "can see an argument for that but depends...."??  SMH

And who is deflecting??  And you calling people cowards....what a joke...as the real cowards in regard to this subject are people like you and Trip!!

If you ask me and I was the owner of a company or leading a federal institution, anyone who would criticize, celebrate, or indicate a person deserved to die because of their opinion, to me they clearly are demonstrating who they truly are as a person and that is a person with absolutely no dignity, humanity, morality, nor decency and should be fired immediately!

[jross]

45 minutes ago, red viking said:

Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? 

This you bro?  ^^^

at below

15 minutes ago, red viking said:

Talking about federal government. This is another winger deflection. 

 

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, jross said:

This you bro?  ^^^

at below

 

Yes, firing somebody from federal govt employment (not using company devices and not during work hours) simply for criticizing him. 

[jross]

Is this a legal question?  I don't know all the rule differences between Federal and Private.  

But what is right?

There are many federal jobs that require critical thinking.  If you cannot discern simple cases as fake from real, I don't want you in positions to make critical thinking jobs.  Like a judge for example.

There are many federal jobs that reflect on the country and its citizens.  If one makes us look disgustingly bad, I don't want to pay their salary.  It's my understanding that you can be terminated for disrupting workplace efficiency, morale, or public trust.  There is more speech beyond celebrating death that should get a federal employee fired.

[Caveira]

24 minutes ago, red viking said:

Yes, firing somebody from federal govt employment (not using company devices and not during work hours) simply for criticizing him. 

There is that word criticizing again.   Tisk tisk 

[red viking]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

There is that word criticizing again.   Tisk tisk 

Yes; that's the issue I have. Keep deflecting though. 

[jross]

Will you provide examples of criticism?