Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Good to see this thread getting some love now! These are still rookie numbers though, gotta pump them up some more!

 

queue bigbrob confused emoji.

Edited by Doublehalf
Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

If you were correct, I would agree with you.  But as you can see below, your simple little brain has failed you once again.  It’s okay little fella, we’re kind of used to it around here…

 

IMG_8124.thumb.jpeg.818cf965761eb2c67d9a8b694c510139.jpeg

So not betting on something like you were. Got it. Thanks confirming what a bettor is 

  • Duck 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

That would be the wise thing to do.....they are better off dealing with RV. 

That side bet your right hand made with your left hand was made by a bettor. 

Posted
19 hours ago, red viking said:

There's not enough in file to put pedo Trump in prison. Just enough to prove he's a pedo though. 

Sounds like you know exactly what's in there. Release the files then.

Posted
2 hours ago, Doublehalf said:

Good to see this thread getting some love now! These are still rookie numbers though, gotta pump them up some more!

 

queue bigbrob confused emoji.

SMH....why do you feel that this thread should be longer than every other thread??  There is not a single person on here that doesn't think the files should be released so why do people need to keep commenting on it?? 

Posted
1 minute ago, Bigbrog said:

SMH....why do you feel that this thread should be longer than every other thread??  There is not a single person on here that doesn't think the files should be released so why do people need to keep commenting on it?? 

Because right now everything else is just a distraction. If it isn't kept front and center everyone's peanut brains will move on to the next dumb distraction that really is pointless to even talk about... I can't think of anything more important right now domestically than the ability to unite over taking down this massive ring of terrible people and its being drawn out and kept from us actively by the administration that campaigned on releasing it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Because right now everything else is just a distraction. If it isn't kept front and center everyone's peanut brains will move on to the next dumb distraction that really is pointless to even talk about... I can't think of anything more important right now domestically than the ability to unite over taking down this massive ring of terrible people and its being drawn out and kept from us actively by the administration that campaigned on releasing it.

Again...who is disagreeing with you??  And if you feel so strongly that it needs to be on everyone's mind go get your blowhorn, make a sign, grab all your purple haired friends, and go block some roads somewhere.

  • Haha 1
Posted
21 hours ago, ionel said:

I don't know about Reuters but you only have to read the first two paragraphs of Beltway to see they are obviously biased.

people have desperately attempted to normalize his absurd abuses of power and blatant corruption

Who are these "people?" 

People who make excuses for him. Like most people who support him here and will go to absurd lengths to justify him being a terrible human being, or try to play the whataboutism game. 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

SMH....why do you feel that this thread should be longer than every other thread??  There is not a single person on here that doesn't think the files should be released so why do people need to keep commenting on it?? 

Everyone on here may say “release the files” but there are definitely some differences of opinion on what those files may and/or may not contain; why the DOJ has shifted course on the release of the files; why Maxwell got a prison transfer no one convicted of those crimes gets right after talking to the DOJ; why Johnson recessed Congress early right before a vote to compel the DOJ to release more….etc.   all worthy subject matter to discuss. 
 

25 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Again...who is disagreeing with you??  And if you feel so strongly that it needs to be on everyone's mind go get your blowhorn, make a sign, grab all your purple haired friends, and go block some roads somewhere.

Couldn’t you say that about every topic on this board? (Maybe better said without the rash generalization of someone you don’t know at all who just happens to disagree with you, but you get my point) 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted

Back to the topic, waht is the danger in her being moved to a minimum security prison?   Are there breakouts all the time in these institutions?  I don't hear about any of that.   If not, then what is the issue?   If so, and I admit I have not heard of escapes that happen every day or week or month, then she should not be there.   She is very recognizable and will be found if she escapes and will go back to max security.   It seems like it would be to her advantage to not do anything drastic in her new digs. 

mspart

Posted
43 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Again...who is disagreeing with you??  And if you feel so strongly that it needs to be on everyone's mind go get your blowhorn, make a sign, grab all your purple haired friends, and go block some roads somewhere.

Are you suggesting only people with purple hair care about the Epstein files and the largest pedophilia ring in modern history penetrating at the highest rungs of power across society doesn't matter to your or anyone else? (Unless of course your hair is purple)

Posted
24 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Everyone on here may say “release the files” but there are definitely some differences of opinion on what those files may and/or may not contain; why the DOJ has shifted course on the release of the files; why Maxwell got a prison transfer no one convicted of those crimes gets right after talking to the DOJ; why Johnson recessed Congress early right before a vote to compel the DOJ to release more….etc.   all worthy subject matter to discuss. 
 

Couldn’t you say that about every topic on this board? (Maybe better said without the rash generalization of someone you don’t know at all who just happens to disagree with you, but you get my point) 

Again, I never said it is a worthy topic to discuss...double indicated that there wasn't enough conversation about it and the reason I told him there probably wasn't pages upon pages of discussion is the majority of people are in agreement.  And all the other things you brought up above, I never said wasn't worthy of discussion (as that isn't my place), but to come on here and grandstand that there isn't enough post about this and that it should be the no. 1 thing on every single person mind is quite weird and not logical.

Posted
1 minute ago, Bigbrog said:

Again, I never said it is a worthy topic to discuss...double indicated that there wasn't enough conversation about it and the reason I told him there probably wasn't pages upon pages of discussion is the majority of people are in agreement.  And all the other things you brought up above, I never said wasn't worthy of discussion (as that isn't my place), but to come on here and grandstand that there isn't enough post about this and that it should be the no. 1 thing on every single person mind is quite weird and not logical.

I seem to remember hunters laptop penetrating every form of discussion at the time that was news and that didn't begin to scratch the level of importance and implications this has... so by your own past standards I'd say it's really not grandstanding to say we want to take down the people that kidnap and abuse kids for sexual exploitation? Unless you feel that's not a big deal...

Posted
38 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

People who make excuses for him. Like most people who support him here and will go to absurd lengths to justify him being a terrible human being, or try to play the whataboutism game. 

It's not the "people" it's that the author said "absurd abuses" and "blatant corruption" in the second paragraph without reference or evidence.  It shows clear bias before even discussing the main point ... poor journalism.

.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Are you suggesting only people with purple hair care about the Epstein files and the largest pedophilia ring in modern history penetrating at the highest rungs of power across society doesn't matter to your or anyone else? (Unless of course your hair is purple)

Hey DH, not sure you've been around long enough to see my posts on this.   My posts have been emphatically to produce the files and let the public decide about them.   I don't care who is in them, get them out there.  

Is that a strong enough reaction for you?   Everyone else has been just as emphatic.   The Ds and leftists are late to this game now that they have orange man to hate.   They had 4 years and now all of the sudden this is the most important thing and everything else is nothing but a distraction?   Give me a break. 

mspart

Posted
9 minutes ago, mspart said:

Back to the topic, waht is the danger in her being moved to a minimum security prison?   Are there breakouts all the time in these institutions?  I don't hear about any of that.   If not, then what is the issue?   If so, and I admit I have not heard of escapes that happen every day or week or month, then she should not be there.   She is very recognizable and will be found if she escapes and will go back to max security.   It seems like it would be to her advantage to not do anything drastic in her new digs.

Can't believe people in here are defending someone who trafficked minors for sexual exploitation for getting a more cushy prison? Shouldn't those people be in the absolute worst conditions? It also looks realllllly bad that trumps team met with her and roughly a week later she got this cushy transfer. Whether she wants to be in a better set up is irrelevant of the fact the president gave the go ahead to probably make the transfer possible and he is helping someone that is guilty of heinous crimes live an easier prison sentence.

he did say that he wished her well or something to that affect when she was found guilty which in and of itself absolutely crazy...

Posted
2 minutes ago, mspart said:

Hey DH, not sure you've been around long enough to see my posts on this.   My posts have been emphatically to produce the files and let the public decide about them.   I don't care who is in them, get them out there.

Hey Bro, don't think I ever invoked your name about this so not sure why you're being so sensitive about it. 
 

also to your other point, I agree the dems were probably late to the party. Mostly because each side demonizes everything that other party wants to accomplish. Kind of like when the dems wanted to get kids in schools free lunches to help with child poverty and the R's voted against it. Now I'm not saying you want kids to starve to death but you sure haven't been anywhere to be found on that topic when it was in the news... so maybe give me a break big guy?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Are you suggesting only people with purple hair care about the Epstein files and the largest pedophilia ring in modern history penetrating at the highest rungs of power across society doesn't matter to your or anyone else? (Unless of course your hair is purple)

They are statistically way more likely to glue themselves to the road.  
 

- release the files.   Put all the crooks in jail 
 

Posted
Just now, Caveira said:

They are statistically way more likely to glue themselves to the road.  

I agree but at least they are smart enough to use the correct glue to accomplish it... a lot of the country bumpkin maga sort would try to grind up their own horse hooves and wonder why it doesn't work as good as Elmer's...

Posted
15 minutes ago, mspart said:

Back to the topic, waht is the danger in her being moved to a minimum security prison?   Are there breakouts all the time in these institutions?  I don't hear about any of that.   If not, then what is the issue?   If so, and I admit I have not heard of escapes that happen every day or week or month, then she should not be there.   She is very recognizable and will be found if she escapes and will go back to max security.   It seems like it would be to her advantage to not do anything drastic in her new digs. 

mspart

Can only speak for myself, but the intrigue to me is that it is a move that is never made for people committing her crimes.  People committing her crimes are never kept on that lower level of prison.  Coupled with the fact that the move was made directly after talking with the President’s personal criminal attorney (or at least he was a year ago before this current post) and it is very intriguing to me.  

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

I agree but at least they are smart enough to use the correct glue to accomplish it... a lot of the country bumpkin maga sort would try to grind up their own horse hooves and wonder why it doesn't work as good as Elmer's...

So you’re certain of something that’s never occurred?

 

 

Edited by Caveira
  • Bob 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Again, I never said it is a worthy topic to discuss...double indicated that there wasn't enough conversation about it and the reason I told him there probably wasn't pages upon pages of discussion is the majority of people are in agreement.  And all the other things you brought up above, I never said wasn't worthy of discussion (as that isn't my place), but to come on here and grandstand that there isn't enough post about this and that it should be the no. 1 thing on every single person mind is quite weird and not logical.

Ok

Posted
11 minutes ago, ionel said:

It's not the "people" it's that the author said "absurd abuses" and "blatant corruption" in the second paragraph without reference or evidence.  It shows clear bias before even discussing the main point ... poor journalism.

Uh I think that his actions have shown he is willing to abuse his office if it benefits him in some way. If you're either too blinded or too stupid to see that, then you're exactly the type of person who is willing to overlook his obviously corrupt administration and activities. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...