Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted


Brennan’s Fake Russia Collusion Assessment Even More Corrupt Than Current Report Shows

“The CIA report released last Tuesday by Director Ratcliffe includes many more problems with both the procedure and the substance of the ICA — a report then-Director John Brennan took the lead in drafting. Among other things, the CIA concluded the ICA report should not have attributed “high confidence” to the conclusion that “Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.” Nor should the ICA have included the Steele Dossier in its annex or referenced it in the text of the report, the CIA concluded.

But those problems and the others detailed in the CIA report pale in comparison to the real corruption at play, according to sources familiar with a separate HPSCI staff report. Those sources told The Federalist that HPSCI, under the leadership of then-Chair Devin Nunes, “found the ICA significantly worse and significantly more corrupt than was conveyed in the CIA report.” The staff report also reveals more details related to the ICA’s report on Russia’s 2016 influence campaign.“


https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/07/exclusive-brennans-fake-russia-collusion-assessment-even-more-corrupt-than-current-report-shows/

Posted

“The lede of the CNN piece contained details only someone with advanced knowledge of the meeting would know. “Classified documents presented last week,” the four CNN writers said, included “allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump” and that “there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.” Material was presented in “a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election,” and “came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative.”

 

That’s what Brennan means by going to “extraordinary lengths” to protect information. The CNN story in one swoop outed classified intelligence, blew its source (all of Washington knew which “former British intelligence operative” CNN meant, which is why Buzzfeed could publish Steele’s dossier within hours) and betrayed the target, Trump. That’s a rare trifecta of incompetence. A coked-up Tourette’s patient would have done a better job guarding information. Are there really people left who believe these people?“

 

https://www.racket.news/p/brennan-msnbc-cant-stop-lying-about

Posted

Comprehensive 

FBI opens 'grand conspiracy' probe on weaponization, opening door to special prosecutor

“The “grand conspiracy” case was opened several weeks ago after new FBI Director Kash Patel took over, and it could get a significant boost if Trump were to declassify two secret tranches of evidence that identify a potential ignition point to the alleged conspiracy in the summer of 2016, according to several people directly familiar with the inquiry, who spoke to Just the News on a condition of anonymity.

The first piece of evidence is a classified annex to a years-old inspector general probe of Hillary Clinton’s improper email server sought by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley. That annex is believed to show that credible information about possible wrongdoing was intentionally ignored by the FBI.

The second tranche of evidence was identified by former Russiagate Special Counsel John Durham in his final report. The evidence was dubbed in the report as the “Clinton plan intelligence," and it was also placed in a classified annex kept from the American public and even many members of Congress.“

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/monfbi-opens-grand-conspiracy-probe-weaponization-opening-door

Evidence may be presented to Grand Jury empaneled in Florida to avoid partisan courts in D.C.

Posted

Damnit.

Was hoping this thread was talking about Brennan from Game Changer.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted

The FISA court judges should also be indicted.  Their ONLY JOB is to detect when the FBI and CIA are lying to them (i.e. protect the American people from the administration) and to punish them mercilessly.  Their failure was not due to being dumb.  They were in on the conspiracy either overtly or they turned a blind eye purposefully.

They were shocked, shocked that the very people they were hired to control could act in an out of control manner.

image.png.309f028dfbc4d1393abf4b6924560372.png

https://y.yarn.co/f4b760cf-7f29-4e5b-a5d4-3b674a705c7c.mp4

  • Bob 1

People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.

Posted
On 7/14/2025 at 5:22 PM, Lipdrag said:

The FISA court judges should also be indicted.  Their ONLY JOB is to detect when the FBI and CIA are lying to them (i.e. protect the American people from the administration) and to punish them mercilessly.  Their failure was not due to being dumb.  They were in on the conspiracy either overtly or they turned a blind eye purposefully.

They were shocked, shocked that the very people they were hired to control could act in an out of control manner.

image.png.309f028dfbc4d1393abf4b6924560372.png

https://y.yarn.co/f4b760cf-7f29-4e5b-a5d4-3b674a705c7c.mp4

I’ll go along with that. 

Posted

SECRET MEETING OPENS FLOODGATES ON TRUMP/RUSSIA HOAX &nbsp

““You look back at what was going on in the FBI starting in 2016 [with] these cases [and] the way they approached Gen. [Michael] Flynn; Crossfire Hurricane; the Russian ‘collusion’ case [prosecuted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller]; then moving to the raid on Mar-a-Lago [and] the [DOJ] lawfare that came after President Trump, this is outrageous. And then you had the arrogance of these two individuals  – Comey and Brennan – it was unbelievable,” former FBI special-agent-in-charge Jody P. Weis, a 22-year veteran of the bureau, said in a recent interview. “So I’m extremely happy that someone is looking into this.”“

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/07/16/exclusive_secret_meeting_opens_document_floodgates_on_trumprussia_hoax_1123108.html

Posted
On 7/9/2025 at 8:04 AM, 1032004 said:

Looks like the right got their marching orders to distract from the Epstein mess

The purpose of the Epstein system was to control key political people and leaders. My guess is Trump is using the information as it was originally  intended.

Posted

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ODNI News Release No. 15-25 
July 18, 2025

 

New Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory and Presidency

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Friday, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard revealed overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how, after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his national security cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump.

  • In the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia is “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.”
  • On December 7, 2016, after the election, talking points were prepared for DNI James Clapper stating, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”
  • On December 9, 2016, President Obama’s White House gathered top National Security Council Principals for a meeting that included James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and others, to discuss Russia.
  • After the meeting, DNI Clapper’s Executive Assistant sent an email to IC leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment “per the President’s request” that details the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” It went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”
  • Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets, including The Washington Post, claiming, “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.”
  • On January 6, 2017, a new Intelligence Community Assessment was released that directly contradicted the IC assessments that were made throughout the previous six months.

After months of investigation into this matter, the facts reveal this new assessment was based on information that was known by those involved to be manufactured i.e. the Steele Dossier or deemed as not credible. This was politicized intelligence that was used as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimize President Trump’s victory, the years-long Mueller investigation, two Congressional impeachments, high level officials being investigated, arrested, and thrown in jail, heightened US-Russia tensions, and more.

“The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue. It is one that concerns every American. The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,” said DNI Tulsi Gabbard. “Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic. No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again. The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it. As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve.”

 

Posted

  

HILLARY, OBAMA AND THE FBI: RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE SPEAKS

Today the Senate Judiciary Committee released a tranche of documents relating to the FBI’s investigation of the Hillary Clinton bathroom-server scandal. Remember that? This is how the committee’s press release begins:

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today is bringing to light the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) findings that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) failed to fully investigate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and mishandling of highly classified information during her time as Secretary of State. The newly declassified “Clinton annex” is an appendix to the DOJ OIG’s June 2018 report reviewing the DOJ and FBI’s handling of the Clinton investigation.

So until now, these materials have been classified, apparently to avoid embarrassment to the Democratic Party.

“This document shows an extreme lack of effort and due diligence in the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s email usage and mishandling of highly classified information,” Grassley said.

The truth, as reflected in the now-declassified documents, seems worse than that. I haven’t tried to fully analyze the new documents, but this memo is intensely interesting. It relates to Russian-language documents, apparently originating with Russian intelligence services:

 

“In a
1 the | brought to the attention of the FBI Cyber Division two Russian-language documents that mentioned Attorney General Loretta Lynch. These documents were identified in the "Post-8 data" and were translated into English by an FBI
linguist.
Both documents appear to be reports discussing purported communications between Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was at the time the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and two different individuals who worked for the Open Society Foundations, a family of offices and foundations created by George Soros. The FBI later determined that the
would have likely obtained any communications underlying the two reports (if such communications in fact
existed) through a cyber intrusion into the Atlantic Council, a private think tank.
The first    report is dated 
and the verbatim translation states in relevant part:”
 

That is already noteworthy. But now, buckle your seat belt for the Russian communications:

 

Screenshot-2025-07-21-at-8.54.18%E2%80%AThe first
report is dated
and the verbatim translation states in relevant part:
Recent information appearing in the media about the FBI investigating possible facts of corruption connected with the State Department [under Clinton] and the granting of preferences to Clinton Fund donors created a negative reaction within the party, though this Information was known to Democratic Party leaders since June 2015, According to Wassermann Schultz [sic], so far the FBI does not have any hard evidence against Hillary Clinton
because data was removed from the mall servers just in time.
Obama is not in the mood to mar the very final segment of his presidency, his legacy with a scandal around a leading nominee for the [D]emocratic [P]arty. To deal with this he is using Attorney General Loretta Lynch to mount a pressure on FBI
[D]irector James Comey, Alas, so far, with no concrete results,
Comey is leaning more to [R]epublicans, and most likely he will be dragging this investigation until the presidential elections; in order to effectively undermine the chances for the
[Democratic Party] to win in the presidential elections...
Screenshot-2025-07-21-at-8.55.45%E2%80%A

The second Russian document:
Screenshot-2025-07-21-at-8.57.18%E2%80%AThe second I
report is dated
verbatim translation states in relevant part:

 

By way of forming a consensus relative to the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, leading the Democratic Party (DP), sanctioned use of all administrative levers to remove possibly negative effects of the FBI Investigation of the business of the Clinton Foundation and the email correspondence of the State
Department.
Based upon information from Wassermann Schultz [sic], the FBI does not anticipate any kind of direct evidence against Clinton, as there was timely deletion from the email servers. The political director of the Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Renteria [PH], regularly receives information from Loretta Lynch of the Department of Justice, on the plans and intentions of the FBI. Active work is being done on clarification mostly with potential witnesses: the primary witnesses are a number of computer specialists in the Clinton private circle. They represent the only tools which may be used in this matter. Therefore, the
threat is minimal....

 

 

So, to recap: “So far the FBI does not have any hard evidence against Hillary Clinton because data was removed from the mail servers just in time.” That, ostensibly from then-DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Then: “Obama is not in the mood to mar the very final segment of his presidency, his legacy with a scandal around a leading nominee for the [D]emocratic [P]arty. To deal with this he is using Attorney General Loretta Lynch to mount a pressure on FBI [D]irector James Comey.” And how about this: “The political director of the Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Renteria [PH], regularly receives information from Loretta Lynch of the Department of Justice, on the plans and intentions of the FBI.”

Remember the famous meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac?

The word “bombshell” is promiscuously used these days, often regarding developments that are modest at best. But these documents, on their face, deserve that characterization. Russian intelligence, of course, is not the word of God. But this wouldn’t be the first time that we learned about nefarious actions of the Obama administration through intercepted Russian intelligence communications.

This deserves very aggressive follow-up.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/07/hillary-obama-and-the-fbi-russian-intelligence-speaks.php

Posted
40 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Some guys will climb a tree to tell a lie when standing on the ground and telling the truth paid better. 

Truth, and it’s amazing how many will so easily believe the lie just because it was said. 

  • Brain 1
Posted (edited)

We all know that there's almost zero evidence that Obama did anything illegal. They haven't arrested him yet and, even though the wingers will talk about all this "overwhelming evidence", they also all know that there will NEVER be an arrest of Obama because it's all a bunch of BS, just like everything else coming from this Administration. 

Trump is a master of controlling the narrative, and that's exactly what he's trying to do here. It's simply a distraction from the Epstein files. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
13 minutes ago, red viking said:

We all know that there's almost zero evidence that Obama did anything illegal.

Those of us who are honest and paying attention realize that when Strzok’s girlfriend texted him that Obama wanted to be told about everything they did, it puts him at the head of the operation.  As usual, you offer nothing more than baseless denial and uninformed conjecture.

  • Fire 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Those of us who are honest and paying attention realize that when Strzok’s girlfriend texted him that Obama wanted to be told about everything they did, it puts him at the head of the operation.  As usual, you offer nothing more than baseless denial and uninformed conjecture.

That allegation is really the strongest evidence you can find that Obama "manufactured" evidence? REALLY? That's pathetic. Good luck getting an arrest with that. 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, red viking said:

That allegation is really the strongest evidence you can find that Obama "manufactured" evidence? REALLY? That's pathetic. Good luck getting an arrest with that. 

Manufactured in the sense that they knew it fake and presented as truth, and withheld key elements that didn’t work in their favor to mislead the court. Everything about it was an illegal operation and criminal abuse of their power. They absolutely were the bad guys and their tactics  mirrored those of the NKVD. 

Edited by El Luchador
  • Bob 1
  • Jagger 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Manufactured in the sense that they knew it fake and presented as truth, and withheld key elements that didn’t work in their favor to mislead the court. Everything about it was an illegal operation and criminal abuse of their power. They absolutely were the bad guys and their tactics  mirrored those of the NKVD. 

You're offering nothing specific. Just re-itterating an accusation, based upon what the Trumptard Admin said, and they lie constantly. There's absolutely nothing here. 

Please provide something specific that he did that was illegal and what the evidence is. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, red viking said:

You're offering nothing specific. Just re-itterating an accusation, based upon what the Trumptard Admin said, and they lie constantly. There's absolutely nothing here. 

Please provide something specific that he did that was illegal and what the evidence is. 

If there is nothing there, then what was the fisa judge angry about? There most certainly was criminal behavior on the part of the the administration. Fabricating a crime and perjury. The entire process was designed to steal an election with a false criminal allegation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...