Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No, it still hasn't no matter how many times you claim it .

How do I spell it out?  None of you right wingers are good humans.  Celebrating ice raids, removing parents from their kids makes you a bad person.  I am sure you sleep well at night with your lack of conscience.

Posted
2 hours ago, 152lbs said:

How do I spell it out? 

That’s what happens when you break the law: you get arrested, incarcerated, and separated from your family. 

  • Bob 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

That’s what happens when you break the law: you get arrested, incarcerated, and separated from your family. 

But isn’t it immoral to arrest criminals at family events ?

Posted
7 hours ago, 152lbs said:

How can anyone be ok with forceable detainment and deportation of immigrants (yes, they undocumented but I don't care) at school graduations, hospitals, places of employment, churches, or even court hearings.  Don't bother answering the rhetorical question.  It has already been established that magas are heartless.

im sorry this is happening to you.

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, red viking said:

They actually are net contributors to the economy, with their willingness to take on low paying jobs that nobody else wants, and also being disproportionately young so that they aren't sucking the govt teet. 

sorry no.

you can repeat this lie a million times and it won't be true

  • Fire 2
  • Jagger 1
Posted
6 hours ago, red viking said:

Horrible analogy. Comparing somebody coming into your house vs the country that you live in. 

 

6 hours ago, 152lbs said:

I will address two questions in one post.  I am against ALL ice raids. The location matters because of the intent.  And the intent is to strike terror and fear into anyone with Brown skin and especially immigrants.

As to art's analogy.  It is garabge that is barely worth addressing. No one is camping in your yard, breaking into your home, stealing your food, etc.

 

ah but they are

btw, they were asked and warned to self deport.

im sorry that all previous admins were gutless

  • Bob 1
Posted
6 hours ago, 152lbs said:

We are dealing with a very racist misconception that people living here unocumented commit more crimes or use government resources disportionately.  They aren't even eligible for SNAP, TANF, etc so that is just a maga talking point lie.  The welfare queen myth perpetuated by reagan lives on.

yet it has been shown they are getting govt money

Posted
6 hours ago, 152lbs said:

A more accurate analogy is an asylum seeker fleeing their country due to economic, political, or social reasons and entering a bordering country without prior authorization. So they take jobs with the lowest barriers to entry and are often exploited by employers under the threat of being turned in.  

yet you don't really understand how asylum works

Posted
6 hours ago, 152lbs said:

Yes, it is very fair to call you heartless when you advocate separating kids from their parents, using abusive tactics to apprehend people whose sole offense is being here without papers.  Absolutely. 

i agree, obama was heartless

  • Jagger 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, Caveira said:

But isn’t it immoral to arrest criminals at family events ?

It’s immoral to break laws, besides, you might kill two stones with one bird.  Channeling scourge there. 

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

What is moral about swinging the back door open, encouraging millions of families to leave their homes and families to break the law, fully knowing that every administration in the last few decades will do their best to apply the laws of the nation to return those families back home and and educate them to follow the law and immigrate legally?

  • Bob 2
Posted
18 hours ago, 152lbs said:

It has already been established that magas are heartless.

It would be very interesting to know if people who tend MAGA are more or less charitable than others.  Hmmm, surely heartless people are not charitable . . . 

"Conservatives give more money to charity than liberals."

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/more-generous-liberals-conservatives-081500677.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAF-ugmvuwrMXFgZc3g4OFjbnfb6_iJt1UowaIePOiJXsuCT-gN4SbtKx-s-CKjuPx_5uquJ17yPzAW_aQnCmR1HDHad_agJp44xhm5nCf8ofwdU2LgnuoMjShvn-D8y8fcMxqMPM11wFarB175G6DbxpC7OgkvGU4gpJOW-7xRAV

  • Fire 1

People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

Libtardos talk about it Conservatives actually do it. 

Posted
1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Libtardos talk about it Conservatives actually do it. 

Lefties' love to donate other people's money to their pet projects and pet people via taxation.  Conservatives donate their own money and believe taxation should be used solely to fund the valid functions of government (roads/infrastructure, courts, defense, and almost nothing else; education at state/local level IF the money goes with the kid).  Charity (or any form of income redistribution) is not one of those valid functions.

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 2

People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.

Posted

...even more hyperbole that reveals intellectual weakness... <name> is heartless for...

Guns

  • Heartless for preventing my ability to protect myself
  • Heartless for prioritizing individual rights over public safety

Unborn children

  • Heartless for terminating the life of an unborn child
  • Heartless for restricting a mother's right to choose

Pronoun Usage

  • Heartless for disregarding the emotional and psychological harm caused by misgendering identities
  • Heartless for disregarding personal conscience, free speech, and reality

Welfare

  • Heartless for enabling dependency and burdening taxpayers
  • Heartless for ignoring the struggles of those who rely on aid to survive
Posted
4 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

It’s refreshing to see the mentions of immorality and no tolerance for those who break the law. 

Does this sarcasm downplay that illegal immigration is a hotter issue than jaywalking?
Posted
1 minute ago, jross said:

 

Does this sarcasm downplay that illegal immigration is a hotter issue than jaywalking?

It’s not sarcasm.  I don’t believe you have ever seen me speak in favor of people being here illegally.  

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

It’s not sarcasm.  I don’t believe you have ever seen me speak in favor of people being here illegally.  

Okay.  I misunderstood.

Through my own perspective, I saw it as a critique of selective outrage over which laws people tolerate breaking.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, jross said:

Okay.  I misunderstood.

Through my own perspective, I saw it as a critique of selective outrage over which laws people tolerate breaking.

Would that speak to your self conscience, perhaps? May be an opportunity for reflection. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...