Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, uncle bernard said:

I don't, but it makes way more sense than the pro-life, former registered Republican, evangelical pastor, small business owner who follows all sorts of conservative accounts on social media, whose hit list was entirely liberals, and who shot two democratic lawmakers, was *actually* a secret leftist who was then planning to peacefully protest at a liberal rally hours after murdering two liberals.

So we have a million pieces of evidence pointing towards him being conservative, and you want to go all-in one one piece that is easily explained away.

I haven’t gone in on ANYTHING.  YOURE making stupid statements with no basis other than your opinion 

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

I haven’t gone in on ANYTHING.  YOURE making stupid statements with no basis other than your opinion 

Ah yes, you're just a neutral observer here. The fact you're trying to poke holes in only one side (the one that's clearly correct, but goes against your ideology) is simply a coincidence. 

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

Ummmmmm this is what I’m talking about. 🤦‍♂️ 

He's talking about millions of deaths, literal millions.

I was using millions figuratively to refer to the overwhelming evidence.

This is 4th grade reading level stuff James.

Posted
Just now, uncle bernard said:

He's talking about millions of deaths, literal millions.

I was using millions figuratively to refer to the overwhelming evidence.

This is 4th grade reading level stuff James.

You just did exactly what he did. 

Posted
1 minute ago, uncle bernard said:

Ah yes, you're just a neutral observer here. The fact you're trying to poke holes in only one side (the one that's clearly correct, but goes against your ideology) is simply a coincidence. 

Again. As I always do. I state facts.  YOU give opinions and try to pawn them off as facts.  It’s your thing. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

So you're saying he didn't work for the last 2 democrat administration's? He didn't get paid to help African immigrants relocate to Minnesota, and he didn't have a car full of No kings flyers?

The 3 lies you fell for previously are:

1) His wife worked for Walz (she didn’t, that was someone else with the same name)

2) He shot dems who voted with Republicans (he shot one, not multiple, who voted with Republicans once, everything else I’ve seen about her has been very leftist, including leading pro-choice legislation which was the likely reason she was targeted)

3) He got paid to help African immigrants relocate to Minnesota (he didn’t work for the Minnesota Africans United organization, he was an unpaid speaker at one event they held, which was about investing IN the Congo, not bringing them here).

You’ve now added a fourth.  He never “worked” for 2 Dem governors, it was an unpaid board.

Posted
7 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

He served on a bipartison pro-business council with other conservatives and liberals, yes. That doesn't mean he's a liberal. 

Don't know about the immigrants thing. He was a Christian missionary in Africa. Again, trying to get Christians into the country doesn't mean he's not Conservative. Conservatives support that stuff all the time.

He did, but if you use even minimal critical thinking, you would surmise that it was part of a disguise he was going to use them as part of a disguise to attack several of the speakers at the rally, who were on his hit list, just like he used the cop disguise to get access to his first victims.

Waltz would never act non partisan in appointments.  He is an extreme leftist.  Dayton slightly more moderate but only because of his family fortune need protection. There are just to many ties to the left to ignore. 

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

You just did exactly what he did. 

No, I didn't you idiot.

He wasn't using hyperbole or figurative language. He was talking about the LITERAL millions of people who died under communist regimes.

I was using figurative language, NOT LITERAL, to refer to the many points of evidence showing he's a conservative.

Posted
2 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

Ah yes, you're just a neutral observer here. The fact you're trying to poke holes in only one side (the one that's clearly correct, but goes against your ideology) is simply a coincidence. 

I didn’t poke any holes in anything. Nothing is clearly correct yet sooo. 

Posted
1 hour ago, uncle bernard said:

Neither were assassinations. Scalise survived. Trump's shooter was not a leftist either. He was a registered Republican. He also donated to the dems once. I don't think his politics were coherent at all and he went through a major mental breakdown leading up to the shooting. I wouldn't pin that on ideology as much as internet-induced schizophrenia.

That could also be the case with Boelter, especially since he apparently listened to InfoWars. What is clear is that he was not liberal, nor leftist. Anybody still saying that is just trying to say it so often that it becomes true in the minds of people who listen to them, which is pretty effective for dimmer audiences (probably what's working on scout for example).

omg

HE DIDN"T KILL THEM.

He just tried.

  • Fire 1
Posted
Just now, uncle bernard said:

No, I didn't you idiot.

He wasn't using hyperbole or figurative language. He was talking about the LITERAL millions of people who died under communist regimes.

I was using figurative language, NOT LITERAL, to refer to the many points of evidence showing he's a conservative.

Prove what he said is what you think it was 

Posted
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

The 3 lies you fell for previously are:

1) His wife worked for Walz (she didn’t, that was someone else with the same name)

2) He shot dems who voted with Republicans (he shot one, not multiple, who voted with Republicans once, everything else I’ve seen about her has been very leftist, including leading pro-choice legislation which was the likely reason she was targeted)

3) He got paid to help African immigrants relocate to Minnesota (he didn’t work for the Minnesota Africans United organization, he was an unpaid speaker at one event they held, which was about investing IN the Congo, not bringing them here).

You’ve now added a fourth.  He never “worked” for 2 Dem governors, it was an unpaid board.

You know both can be true. He could be a speaker and have received revenue. 

Posted
1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

Waltz would never act non partisan in appointments.  He is an extreme leftist.  Dayton slightly more moderate but only because of his family fortune need protection. There are just to many ties to the left to ignore. 

BAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

Clearly it was a disguise. Bahahahahahahha 

So, what is your argument? That he planned to attend No Kings as a supportive protester after murdering two democrats and trying to murder two others?

  • Bob 1
Posted
1 minute ago, uncle bernard said:

So, what is your argument? That he planned to attend No Kings as a supportive protester after murdering two democrats and trying to murder two others?

I’m smart enough to wait for more facts to come out. Clearly he’s deranged 

Posted
2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

You know both can be true. He could be a speaker and have received revenue. 

Their CEO stated that that one appearance was his only involvement with the organization.

Of course if you’re just going to claim that anything that disagrees with your narrative is a lie then we’re probably done here

Posted
1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

You know both can be true. He could be a speaker and have received revenue. 

No, he specifically was not paid by either organization for speaking, in the case of Africa, or for serving on the board, for the state government. There is no wiggle room for you here.

At this point, can't you look in the mirror? Every single thing you've thrown at the wall has fallen apart. Maybe, just maybe, there was at least 1 conservative in America willing to murder a politician? Murder happens every day here. Why is that so impossible for you to admit.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

omg

HE DIDN"T KILL THEM.

He just tried.

There are many people on xtwitter still arguing that Boelter’s motive was against the people that voted with Republicans because Hortman was the only one that died.

Posted

Why are people so hell bent on putting this psycho on one side or the other??  Does it really matter?  He is a murder...that is the only label he should have, and he should spend the rest of his life being some dudes cell mate love doll.

Posted
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Their CEO stated that that one appearance was his only involvement with the organization.

Of course if you’re just going to claim that anything that disagrees with your narrative is a lie then we’re probably done here

Back at you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...