White Conservatives are the biggest threat

[Scouts Honor]

colorado govt will soon be having a convo to determine if fire bombing elderly women walking rises to the level of the terror of not baking the cake

[scourge165]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Obviously a horrible attack, but there were no casualties.  “Amuse” might be the biggest liar on xtwitter, I’d be careful what you share from him. 

While casualties ALMOST universally a colloquialism for Deaths, in reality, it simply means injured or killed(though ask the same person how many casualties there were on Jan6th and they'll say zero....well, they'll say one, the moron who got some extra ventilation trying to rush past secret service onto the floor of Congress).  

[JimmySpeaks]

9 hours ago, scourge165 said:

I'm honestly not even sure why people care what race the person was. 

I don't celebrate when I see the guy who shot a bunch of black people who offered prayer and comfort to a sick young kid were then murdered by someone with EXTREME and screwed up political principles. 

But the people who get defensive about it, the people who think it somehow represents them...they're kinda telling on themselves. 

Ummmmm didn’t you just make a post about four white dudes???  Smfh

[Caveira]

9 hours ago, scourge165 said:

...what a truly moronic game. 

Topic- Biggest threat of domestic terrorism

Answer- The dead guy from Cambodia! 

 

This would be akin to me bringing up Hitler for the Far Right given his Ultranationalism and Ethnocentrism... which is a pretty stupid argument, but at least closer to the mark as there are more Neo-Nazi or White Supremacists than there are people who support...Pol Pot. 

The level of stupidity to bring up a dead Cambodian when talking about domestic terrorism is...truly Jimmy-esque. 

 

This isn't even a debatable topic. The overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks, plots and deaths are committed by white nationalists. Bringing up Pol Pot tells me you both don't understand the topic and you feel some...bizarre need to defend those people...which is odd. 

That dead guy from Cambodia still motivates a lot of the hard core leftists out there.  So there is that. 

[scourge165]

2 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

wow you dont even remember mentioning hitler 

then fail to make the connection that trump has been called hitler for years..

while you worry about pol pot being brought into the convo

Good boy. Yes. I brought up Hitler to show the absurdity of citing Pol Pot when talking about Domestic Terrorist threats.

What I DID NOT do was mention Trump...

Again...you REALLY cannot follow the thread YOU started, can you?

 

I even made the point that NEITHER represent American Politics or is pertinent to this conversation, but... you saw someone call Trump Hitler so in your feeble, ADD riddled brain, that must mean that I  compared Trump to Hitler in this thread?

Show me where. I'll be happy to apologize for doing so...(I suspect you're going to bring up several more strawman arguments and veer off-topic again as you're not capable of staying on point). 

[scourge165]

Just now, Caveira said:

That dead guy from Cambodia still motivates a lot of the hard core leftists out there.  So there is that. 

Yeah, I don't actually think he does. Who the hell is following Pol Pot in 2025? 

I know Hitler still "motivates" a lot of "Hard Core right wingers" out there... yet NEITHER is in ANY WAY a reasonable answer to what demographic constitutes the biggest threat to domestic terrorism. 

 

If you wanted to cite Communists who were still influential, Marx or Engels would be reasonable choices...until 18 year olds take World History 110 and then they largely disappear. 

There are ~15,000 self described "communists," in the United States. 

There are more people in the Aryan Brotherhood than that. 

 

But NONE of this is the point. This is how stupid these conversations get. Biggest Domestic Terrorist Threat...and I got Pol Pot as an answer. Seriously...Pol Pot, a guy who hasn't Governed in...what, 45+ years? 

And then they doubled down, I cited Hitler...NEVER mentioned Trump and suddenly it's a "you compared Hitler and Trump." 

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah, I don't actually think he does. Who the hell is following Pol Pot in 2025? 

I know Hitler still "motivates" a lot of "Hard Core right wingers" out there... yet NEITHER is in ANY WAY a reasonable answer to what demographic constitutes the biggest threat to domestic terrorism. 

 

If you wanted to cite Communists who were still influential, Marx or Engels would be reasonable choices...until 18 year olds take World History 110 and then they largely disappear. 

There are ~15,000 self described "communists," in the United States. 

There are more people in the Aryan Brotherhood than that. 

 

But NONE of this is the point. This is how stupid these conversations get. Biggest Domestic Terrorist Threat...and I got Pol Pot as an answer. Seriously...Pol Pot, a guy who hasn't Governed in...what, 45+ years? 

And then they doubled down, I cited Hitler...NEVER mentioned Trump and suddenly it's a "you compared Hitler and Trump." 

What about all those Che t-shirts that are popular with the feminine males on college campuses.  

[JimmySpeaks]

Typical Scrooge, accuse someone of going off point while doing just that.  

[1032004]

27 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

While casualties ALMOST universally a colloquialism for Deaths, in reality, it simply means injured or killed(though ask the same person how many casualties there were on Jan6th and they'll say zero....well, they'll say one, the moron who got some extra ventilation trying to rush past secret service onto the floor of Congress).  

Fair enough, learn something new everyday.  I thought casualties always referred to deaths.  Although I’m sure that x account used that word intentionally because many people likely associate it with deaths.

Edited June 2 by 1032004

[scourge165]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Fair enough, learn something new everyday.  I thought casualties always referred to deaths.  Although I’m sure that x account used that word intentionally because many people likely associate it with deaths.

Of course it did. Their currency is lies and intellectual dishonesty. 

And they can purchase the likes of JimmySpeaks and ScoutsHonor with said currency. 

[Caveira]

22 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah, I don't actually think he does. Who the hell is following Pol Pot in 2025? 

I know Hitler still "motivates" a lot of "Hard Core right wingers" out there... yet NEITHER is in ANY WAY a reasonable answer to what demographic constitutes the biggest threat to domestic terrorism. 

 

If you wanted to cite Communists who were still influential, Marx or Engels would be reasonable choices...until 18 year olds take World History 110 and then they largely disappear. 

There are ~15,000 self described "communists," in the United States. 

There are more people in the Aryan Brotherhood than that. 

 

But NONE of this is the point. This is how stupid these conversations get. Biggest Domestic Terrorist Threat...and I got Pol Pot as an answer. Seriously...Pol Pot, a guy who hasn't Governed in...what, 45+ years? 

And then they doubled down, I cited Hitler...NEVER mentioned Trump and suddenly it's a "you compared Hitler and Trump." 

pol pots lingering influence    Of so the article in The NY Times is titled   

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/17/opinion/pol-pots-lingering-influence.html

[scourge165]

21 minutes ago, Caveira said:

What about all those Che t-shirts that are popular with the feminine males on college campuses.  

WTF?

How are you all incapable of staying on topic?

What about Che? You just said Pol Pot is still influential despite being deposed in the....mid 70s and being dead for ~30 years. 

Now it's Che tee-shirts? Yeah, you see them on College Campuses? What of it?

 

Is this how ridiculous we're getting? Who do you think is more likely to commit an act of violence, a blue haired College Freshmen or a guy with a Swastika Tat? 

I don't even know what the point of ANY of this is. This isn't a debatable question. White Conservatives ARE behind the vast majority of terrorist attacks and fatalities. 

Not some first year College Student who read Engels for the first time and read about the THEORY of communism.

 

[scourge165]

21 minutes ago, Caveira said:

pol pots lingering influence    Of so the article in The NY Times is titled   

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/17/opinion/pol-pots-lingering-influence.html

LMFAO... you didn't read that, didn't you?

Now cite how the Editorial Section of the Times from Pol Pots death in 1998 is impacting anyone today?

Cut and paste from that article...

 

Just change "Women" to "MAGA." 

 

A 1998 Pol Pot article that says nothing about Pol Pots influence IN the United States. This is beneath you Caveira. This is more Jimmy or 'lil Scouts speed. Posting things they haven't read about something that's not even related to Domestic Terrorism in the United States. 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

LMFAO... you didn't read that, didn't you?

 

Brilliant 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Fair enough, learn something new everyday.  I thought casualties always referred to deaths.  Although I’m sure that x account used that word intentionally because many people likely associate it with deaths.

Not necessarily.

Our friends at Cornell Law weigh in:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=34-USC-2126574678-506818815&term_occur=999&term_src=title:34:subtitle:I:chapter:101:subchapter:XI:part:A:section:10281

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

11 hours ago, scourge165 said:

I don't even know why this thread was started other than there are people sick enough to almost rejoice when someone else does something horrible. 

It should be noted though for the morons who are citing historical characters when talking about "Left" and "Right" in the context of domestic threats, Hamas is a "Right-Wing" organization rooted in Religious fundamentalism. 

 

Now I'd never attribute those beliefs to anyone on here, but if you're dumb enough to cite Pol Pot, I suppose you'd have to equally accept Hamas and the like as being on "the right." 

None of that changes this was a truly moronic thread and El Luchador took it to levels of stupidity I didn't know possible. 

Luchador in his 'man cave' in the shed.

 

Edited June 2 by Saylors_Tiny_Willie

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

pol pots lingering influence    Of so the article in The NY Times is titled   

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/17/opinion/pol-pots-lingering-influence.html

From 1998. 27 years ago.

Nice self own there.

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

2 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Good boy. Yes. I brought up Hitler to show the absurdity of citing Pol Pot when talking about Domestic Terrorist threats.

What I DID NOT do was mention Trump...

Again...you REALLY cannot follow the thread YOU started, can you?

 

I even made the point that NEITHER represent American Politics or is pertinent to this conversation, but... you saw someone call Trump Hitler so in your feeble, ADD riddled brain, that must mean that I  compared Trump to Hitler in this thread?

Show me where. I'll be happy to apologize for doing so...(I suspect you're going to bring up several more strawman arguments and veer off-topic again as you're not capable of staying on point). 

So many tears from the wingers here.

 

[Scouts Honor]

4 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah, I don't actually think he does. Who the hell is following Pol Pot in 2025? 

I know Hitler still "motivates" a lot of "Hard Core right wingers" out there... yet NEITHER is in ANY WAY a reasonable answer to what demographic constitutes the biggest threat to domestic terrorism. 

 

If you wanted to cite Communists who were still influential, Marx or Engels would be reasonable choices...until 18 year olds take World History 110 and then they largely disappear. 

There are ~15,000 self described "communists," in the United States. 

There are more people in the Aryan Brotherhood than that. 

 

But NONE of this is the point. This is how stupid these conversations get. Biggest Domestic Terrorist Threat...and I got Pol Pot as an answer. Seriously...Pol Pot, a guy who hasn't Governed in...what, 45+ years? 

And then they doubled down, I cited Hitler...NEVER mentioned Trump and suddenly it's a "you compared Hitler and Trump." 

 

4 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Of course it did. Their currency is lies and intellectual dishonesty. 

And they can purchase the likes of JimmySpeaks and ScoutsHonor with said currency. 

lol

[Scouts Honor]

3 hours ago, scourge165 said:

WTF?

How are you all incapable of staying on topic?

What about Che? You just said Pol Pot is still influential despite being deposed in the....mid 70s and being dead for ~30 years. 

Now it's Che tee-shirts? Yeah, you see them on College Campuses? What of it?

 

Is this how ridiculous we're getting? Who do you think is more likely to commit an act of violence, a blue haired College Freshmen or a guy with a Swastika Tat? 

I don't even know what the point of ANY of this is. This isn't a debatable question. White Conservatives ARE behind the vast majority of terrorist attacks and fatalities. 

Not some first year College Student who read Engels for the first time and read about the THEORY of communism.

 

it's called making connections.

communists are communists.

im sorry that you are so naive

[Scouts Honor]

4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Fair enough, learn something new everyday.  I thought casualties always referred to deaths.  Although I’m sure that x account used that word intentionally because many people likely associate it with deaths.

oh come on leftist

you KNOW that every microaggression makes a casualty of any leftist

 

how quickly you guys have forgotten that speech from the right is violence

and violence from the left is speech

'they are rioting to have their voices heard'!!

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

So many tears from the wingers here.

 

IKR??  You wokester wingers sure shed them tears 

[Scouts Honor]

lots  of wee activity 

to distract from his fire bombing

[scourge165]

9 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

it's called making connections.

communists are communists.

im sorry that you are so naive

So no, you're not able to follow along.

 

Again, Pol Pot cited as an example of the threat of domestic terrorism. Can't make this up! 

[Scouts Honor]