Trump Admin Arrests Judge

[Offthemat]

10 hours ago, JimmyCinnabon said:

Thirty four felony convictions I guess. 

Oh, the irony.  Or karma.  If the claims against the prosecutor in this case are treated the same way, she could be facing felony charges that number in the hundreds.  

[mspart]

She was arrested based on her escorting the illegal and his lawyer out a private door.   RV says that is not true.   I have read that in one other place.   If that is true, then probably the charges will be dropped or this will become apparent during trial.   DOJ should verify if that new thought is true or not.  

But, she stopped the proceedings of the trial for this guy to escort him out a door that he and his lawyer are not supposed to go out.   That is harboring or concealing or at the very least, the intent to do so.   This will be interesting for sure.   If this new story is true, then it will be interesting to see how this plays out. 

mspart

[ionel]

1 minute ago, mspart said:

She was arrested based on her escorting the illegal and his lawyer out a private door.   RV says that is not true.   I have read that in one other place.   If that is true, then probably the charges will be dropped or this will become apparent during trial.   DOJ should verify if that new thought is true or not.  

But, she stopped the proceedings of the trial for this guy to escort him out a door that he and his lawyer are not supposed to go out.   That is harboring or concealing or at the very least, the intent to do so.   This will be interesting for sure.   If this new story is true, then it will be interesting to see how this plays out. 

mspart

I heard rv either stayed in a Holliday Express or graduated Harvard Law and he says the judge wasn't legally required to help - case closed.  

[WrestlingRasta]

From what I’ve read on multiple occasions, whether or not they had a judicial warrant is a big piece to whether or not she broke the law. If that is the case, and they in fact did not have a judicial warrant…..I will say I don’t like what she did, but as a matter of breaking the law, it wouldn’t seem so.  

[ionel]

3 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

From what I’ve read on multiple occasions, whether or not they had a judicial warrant is a big piece to whether or not she broke the law. If that is the case, and they in fact did not have a judicial warrant…..I will say I don’t like what she did, but as a matter of breaking the law, it wouldn’t seem so.  

But as an officer of the court she is required to follow the law correct?  Also as a judge I bet she knows some very fine lawyers who should be able to get this quickly dismissed if she was following the law. 

[WrestlingRasta]

1 minute ago, ionel said:

But as an officer of the court she is required to follow the law correct?  Also as a judge I bet she knows some very fine lawyers who should be able to get this quickly dismissed if she was following the law. 

Correct, which is where the judicial warrant comes into play.  Again just going by what I’ve read from multiple sources, I don’t pretend to know all about things I know nothing about. 

[Offthemat]

You read the statute @mspart put up, it doesn’t mention any warrant.  There are lots of people arrested for “aiding and abetting” every year when there is no warrant of any type involved.  

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, mspart said:

She was arrested based on her escorting the illegal and his lawyer out a private door.   RV says that is not true.   I have read that in one other place.   If that is true, then probably the charges will be dropped or this will become apparent during trial.   DOJ should verify if that new thought is true or not.  

But, she stopped the proceedings of the trial for this guy to escort him out a door that he and his lawyer are not supposed to go out.   That is harboring or concealing or at the very least, the intent to do so.   This will be interesting for sure.   If this new story is true, then it will be interesting to see how this plays out. 

mspart

According to an article in the National Review there are witnesses that saw her escort them out the door in question.  

[ionel]

5 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

According to an article in the National Review there are witnesses that saw her escort them out the door in question.  

Was rv one of them?

[JimmySpeaks]

11 minutes ago, ionel said:

Was rv one of them?

I have it on good authority that he’s the guys lawyer. 

[Caveira]

18 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I have it on good authority that he’s the guys lawyer. 

Was this the judge that was arrested ?

 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

Was this the judge that was arrested ?

 

Oh oh 

[ionel]

22 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I have it on good authority that he’s the guys lawyer. 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, ionel said:

“It’s no joke, if you’re woke I’m the lawyer for you”

”better Red than dead. Come see me if you’ve got a problem” 

“take a liking to this Viking. Pronouns are our friend” 

“never take a loss, especially if you’re with Hamas.  Call me “ 

[red viking]

53 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Oh oh 

Has absolutely zero to do with whether there was a "criminal" act. Zero. 

[JimmySpeaks]

36 minutes ago, red viking said:

Has absolutely zero to do with whether there was a "criminal" act. Zero. 

“Oh oh” usually doesn’t 

[mspart]

https://www.wisn.com/article/wisconsin-supreme-court-suspends-milwaukee-county-judge-dugan/64625821

Sorry RV, even your WI SC didn't like what Judge Dugan did.   Suspended !   Temporarily of course.   I'm sure if she is acquitted or not charged, they will reinstate.   If she is prosecuted and convicted, I'm guessing she just lost her job. 

Now why would this be?  They obviously did not consult with RV on this action.  I'm guessing if they had consulted with RV, this action would never have been taken. 

mspart

[red viking]

20 minutes ago, mspart said:

https://www.wisn.com/article/wisconsin-supreme-court-suspends-milwaukee-county-judge-dugan/64625821

Sorry RV, even your WI SC didn't like what Judge Dugan did.   Suspended !   Temporarily of course.   I'm sure if she is acquitted or not charged, they will reinstate.   If she is prosecuted and convicted, I'm guessing she just lost her job. 

Now why would this be?  They obviously did not consult with RV on this action.  I'm guessing if they had consulted with RV, this action would never have been taken. 

mspart

...and either way, the case will be dismissed due to zero evidence that she violated any law and I can guarantee that the crybaby victim mentality wingers will once again say it was only because of an "activist judge" that dismissed the bs case. 

It's 100% predictable. 

[Offthemat]

9 minutes ago, red viking said:

the case will be dismissed

The Wisconsin Supreme Court recognizes that she broke federal laws, even if you don’t.  In the meantime, she’s off the bench, never to return. 

[mspart]

Unless it is not dismissed.   What will you be crying if that is the case?  I think there is ample evidence that she concealed or harbored, or shielded from detection this alien.   The actual law as it is currently written.   Obviously stopping a judicial proceeding to escort the alien and his lawyer to go out a back door can easily be defined as shielding and concealing.   Harboring has a time length by connotation and that might be tougher to prove.   But only one has to be proved to bring conviction of the law and bring on its punishment.  

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/8-usc-sect-1324/

8 U.S.C. § 1324 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1324. Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by FindLaw Staff

(a)Criminal penalties

(1)(A) Any person who--

(i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;

(ii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;

(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;

(iv) encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or

(v)(I) engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or

(II) aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,

shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).

mspart

[Caveira]

21 minutes ago, mspart said:

in any place, including any building

In any place, including any building.   
 

defend that @red viking