Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias

[Caveira]

Just now, red viking said:

Read the artcle

We know you didn’t.  Your attention span isn’t that long. 
 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

Read the artcle

If you read it then you know. 

[Gene Mills Fan]

I skimmed thru it. It says 'the year of the Lord' was not in the Washington and early drafts. Then Franklin wanted a date and the witnesses to sign. Madison and the convention committee came up with  notes for the intro.  The final notes had the date  then scribbled '&c--- " after it,.  They hired a calligraphy guy and the script was written and shown to all and approved and then added.   Basically the article sides that how the words got there is meaningless and up to interpretation. Its basic argument is that the Constitution is not a 'Christain manifesto'  We all agree with that. It does however give evidence that all, saw it read it and approved the words, before it was added .  

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

I skimmed thru it. It says 'the year of the Lord' was not in the Washington and early drafts. Then Franklin wanted a date and the witnesses to sign. Madison and the convention committee came up with  notes for the intro.  The final notes had the date  then scribbled '&c--- " after it,.  They hired a calligraphy guy and the script was written and shown to all and approved and then added.   Basically the article sides that how the words got there is meaningless and up to interpretation. Its basic argument is that the Constitution is not a 'Christain manifesto'  We all agree with that. It does however give evidence that all, saw it read it and approved the words, before it was added .  

This  

[red viking]

1 hour ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

 ...Its basic argument is that the Constitution is not a 'Christain manifesto'...

That's my point. In fact, not even remotely close to that. Now tell that to the millions of whacko wingers that think otherwise.

Edited yesterday at 01:43 PM by red viking

[Scouts Honor]

41 minutes ago, red viking said:

That's my point. In fact, not even remotely close to that. Now tell that to the millions of whacko wingers that think otherwise.

as soon as you tell are your whacko wingers that believe all the things you claim to disavow 

[Gene Mills Fan]

59 minutes ago, red viking said:

That's my point. In fact, not even remotely close to that. Now tell that to the millions of whacko wingers that think otherwise.

It does imply that the majority of the authors were Christians. 

[red viking]

9 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

It does imply that the majority of the authors were Christians. 

"Implies." Sure. Makes it all the more interesting that they kept any reference to Christ or Christianity out of it. Very purposeful. NOT a Christian nation, not a theocracy. 

[JimmySpeaks]

4 hours ago, red viking said:

That's my point. In fact, not even remotely close to that. Now tell that to the millions of whacko wingers that think otherwise.

Playing the drama card again. Nobody said it was.   You woke winger atheists sure think you’re  smart.  

Edited 22 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

It does imply that the majority of the authors were Christians. 

Which has been the point all along.  He just can’t handle that white Christian men created something as magnificent as America.  It bothers him that they figured it out before anyone else did.  Any other sex.  Any other race. Any other religion.   It tears him apart 

   
In the year of our Lord April 25, 2025 

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, red viking said:

"Implies." Sure. Makes it all the more interesting that they kept any reference to Christ or Christianity out of it. Very purposeful. NOT a Christian nation, not a theocracy. 

It was very smart of those white Christian men to think of the bigger picture and the future.  It’s similar to how the first couple of Amendments were written.  To cover the future that they couldn’t predict. 

Edited 22 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[mspart]

Yet they wrote them because they could predict human behavior. 

mspart

[JimmySpeaks]

6 hours ago, mspart said:

Yet they wrote them because they could predict human behavior. 

mspart

They hoped they could and they did 

[red viking]

8 hours ago, mspart said:

Yet they wrote them because they could predict human behavior. 

mspart

They didn't anticipate a President that would just ignore judges orders and a congress that wouldn't stand up to a 100% corrupt and 200% incompetent president. 

[red viking]

Funding Fathers significantly overrated. They were slave owners who only wanted white men to be able to vote. Revolutionary War was a power grab that left the avg person worse off.

[gimpeltf]

5 hours ago, red viking said:

Funding Fathers significantly overrated. 

Given 250 years of inflation, they didn't need that much money back then!

[JimmySpeaks]

8 hours ago, red viking said:

Funding Fathers significantly overrated. They were slave owners who only wanted white men to be able to vote. Revolutionary War was a power grab that left the avg person worse off.

Our founding or funding fathers were brilliant white, mostly Christian, men that created an empire