Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Not that I am aware of

I was thinking that was the case in the early 80s but I was pretty young and clueless back then

Posted
On 3/23/2025 at 6:55 AM, Eagle26 said:

I have an idea for that… what about if it’s 0-0 after two minutes, the ref has to put someone on a 30 second shot clock and if they don’t score, their opponent gets a point. 

How about a second stall call? 2 minutes in and no points somebody should be hit for stalling. I see guys back all around the mat for 2 periods and no stalling called. Yet a stall seems to be called on the one winning in the 3rd often. Another stall that is often called is when one wrestler is getting dominated. TD and let up on repeat. The one getting taken down repeatedly is hit for stalling. He can be wrestling full bore, but not able to get a shot off due to being over matched and is hit for stalling. Poor wrestler maybe, but not stalling. Refs just let others dance around and nobody is called for stalling. Neither wrestler even shows interest in getting an offensive attack off. Those are the ones that need to be hit for stalling. 

Posted
On 4/1/2025 at 11:05 AM, Wrestleknownothing said:

God, I hate pie charts

"I have that all written up here in a pie graph here.  And over here I have a rubber chicken graph...."  - Steve Martin

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...