Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice work in providing the articles.  So as it is, the contract was in fact NOT for only 93 vehicles as you intitially indicated and just can’t get your claws off….and appropriated by Congress, not via executive order on the President, as you initially indicated and can’t get your claws off of.  
 

You see boys and girls, this is a good example where such a severe case of something something DS impairs your ability to not even be able to comprehend your own “gotcha” moments.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Nice work in providing the articles.  So as it is, the contract was in fact NOT for only 93 vehicles as you intitially indicated and just can’t get your claws off….and appropriated by Congress, not via executive order on the President, as you initially indicated and can’t get your claws off of.  
 

You see boys and girls, this is a good example where such a severe case of something something DS impairs your ability to not even be able to comprehend your own “gotcha” moments.  

Just going off memory here but wasn’t this proposed by Biten, pressed through congress without a Republican vote (deciding vote in the Senate cast by Kamela)?  That Manchin says he regrets voting for?  That’s end product was just costly and wasteful as all the renewable projects have been, since Solyndra, and beyond?

Posted
1 hour ago, Le duke said:


In the summary itself, they say the contract is for 3,000.

93 have been delivered so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So.  Succcccceeeesssss?    lol.  

  • Pirate 1
Posted

Hot off the press.  Gavin newsome was doing doge before doge was a thing.  I’m actually a little surprised they didn’t pick him over musk to lead this.   You cant argue that California leads the way in efficient government spending.   Can you?
 

^^^^ That’s youtube.  It’s safe to click.  

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Career politicians don’t know what to do with people who want to change things.   What does a letter do lol 

1/1024th woot 
 

 

Edited by Caveira
Posted
20 minutes ago, mspart said:

2^-10 in binary speak.   Just for you  nerds out there. 

mspart

I did smile a little at the 1024 reference.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...