Threadkilla Posted March 11 Posted March 11 He is 19-2 and finished ahead of 5 guys in the top 10 and beat 3 H2H, (depending on ranker). He has as many good wins as anybody in the country. Am I wrong?
Le duke Posted March 11 Posted March 11 I’m sure @jajensen will be along to make the case for Smith over Davis based on head to head, plus Husker.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
wrestle87 Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Hard to argue with. It will be unpopular, but he just outplaced what seems like all the best in the weight. 1
PortaJohn Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Probably. He has better wins and better losses than all the other conference champs I Don't Agree With What I Posted
CHROMEBIRD Posted March 11 Posted March 11 No argument here. I just don't think it'll matter too much. 1
flyingcement Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Winner of Big Ten in this years 125 was always going to be the most likely 1 seed
flyingcement Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Stanich could also make an argument, but Davis should be 2 at worst
PortaJohn Posted March 11 Posted March 11 (edited) 1 minute ago, flyingcement said: Stanich could also make an argument, but Davis should be 2 at worst At this point Braeden has far more better wins and far better losses. Hard to see him not jumping Stanich Edited March 11 by PortaJohn 1 I Don't Agree With What I Posted
flyingcement Posted March 11 Posted March 11 3 minutes ago, PortaJohn said: At this point Braeden has far more better wins and far better losses. Hard to see him not jumping Stanich Davis giving up bonus to Caleb Smith was a noteworthy consideration that I consider worth of bringing to the table. I think Davis is the more likely number one, but concede an argument to be made for Stanich
PortaJohn Posted March 11 Posted March 11 3 minutes ago, flyingcement said: Davis giving up bonus to Caleb Smith was a noteworthy consideration that I consider worth of bringing to the table. I think Davis is the more likely number one, but concede an argument to be made for Stanich Fair point. Wonder if the loss to Jax Forrest will play into it at all even if it's not officially on Stanich's record for seeding I Don't Agree With What I Posted
flyingcement Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Just now, PortaJohn said: Fair point. Wonder if the loss to Jax Forrest will play into it at all even if it's not officially on Stanich's record for seeding That's the other thing. For me, I'd hold it against him - but for others, they may not. Davis still should be the betting favorite to be the one seed I'd think
Pinnacle Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Does it matter when 8 can beat 1 as often as the other way around. 3
PortaJohn Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Just now, Pinnacle said: Does it matter when 8 can beat 1 as often as the other way around. Not this year I Don't Agree With What I Posted
Threadkilla Posted March 11 Author Posted March 11 (edited) 6 minutes ago, PortaJohn said: Fair point. Wonder if the loss to Jax Forrest will play into it at all even if it's not officially on Stanich's record for seeding Agreed, I think Davis is pretty clear #1. But I will wait for Pyles confirmation tomorrow. Edited March 11 by Threadkilla
flyingcement Posted March 11 Posted March 11 Seems likely that Michael Joyce is the 33rd seed and Tristan Lujan the 32nd
Threadkilla Posted March 11 Author Posted March 11 2 minutes ago, flyingcement said: Seems likely that Michael Joyce is the 33rd seed and Tristan Lujan the 32nd So Davis is in trouble? 1
Pish Posted March 11 Posted March 11 59 minutes ago, PortaJohn said: Probably. He has better wins and better losses than all the other conference champs Losses don’t come into play. Stanch will have him beat in coaches rank. Davis will have him beat in winning %. Probably will come down to RPI
PortaJohn Posted March 11 Posted March 11 15 minutes ago, Pish said: Losses don’t come into play. Good Point. Quality wins is 20% which I believe Davis should have another advantage I Don't Agree With What I Posted
Pish Posted March 11 Posted March 11 17 minutes ago, PortaJohn said: Good Point. Quality wins is 20% which I believe Davis should have another advantage Yep. Either way that’s your 1 and 2 seeds. No one else has a shot
jajensen09 Posted March 11 Posted March 11 2 hours ago, Le duke said: I’m sure @jajensen will be along to make the case for Smith over Davis based on head to head, plus Husker. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Shit I'd love Smith to be last seed and wrestle Davis first round. We all know davis isn't winning 125 1
Threadkilla Posted March 11 Author Posted March 11 8 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: Shit I'd love Smith to be last seed and wrestle Davis first round. We all know davis isn't winning 125 Perhaps, but he still should be ranked #1.
MLB9 Posted March 11 Posted March 11 8 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: Shit I'd love Smith to be last seed and wrestle Davis first round. We all know davis isn't winning 125 Teched by Barnett, a TECH FALL, shortly after you declared Davis part of a “very average” group that just went 1, 3, 2, 3 at the Big Ten Tournament. You’re the worst poster in the history of these forums, at least Cinnabun was trolling. You actually believe the crap that you type.
jajensen09 Posted March 11 Posted March 11 19 minutes ago, MLB9 said: Teched by Barnett, a TECH FALL, shortly after you declared Davis part of a “very average” group that just went 1, 3, 2, 3 at the Big Ten Tournament. You’re the worst poster in the history of these forums, at least Cinnabun was trolling. You actually believe the crap that you type. If you don't see this year 125 is all about matchups, then I can tell you aren't paying attention
MLB9 Posted March 11 Posted March 11 50 minutes ago, jajensen09 said: If you don't see this year 125 is all about matchups, then I can tell you aren't paying attention Ok. The totality of season matchups will determine one guy is a #1 or 2 seed(likely) and the other guy is, I don’t know, a 12 to 15? Maybe worse? One is definitely better at matchups, which seem fairly important here, and it’s not the one you’re pedestaling. But that’s not the worst of your commentary. The “very average” group of four PSU wrestlers just outscored the mighty big Husker four 66.5 to 54 this weekend. And history tells us one of those groups gets even better ~two weeks later and one doesn’t. Are you ready to retract anything yet? Just say you were speaking on emotion and frustration and I won’t bring it up again.
jajensen09 Posted March 11 Posted March 11 7 minutes ago, MLB9 said: Ok. The totality of season matchups will determine one guy is a #1 or 2 seed(likely) and the other guy is, I don’t know, a 12 to 15? Maybe worse? One is definitely better at matchups, which seem fairly important here, and it’s not the one you’re pedestaling. But that’s not the worst of your commentary. The “very average” group of four PSU wrestlers just outscored the mighty big Husker four 66.5 to 54 this weekend. And history tells us one of those groups gets even better ~two weeks later and one doesn’t. Are you ready to retract anything yet? Just say you were speaking on emotion and frustration and I won’t bring it up again. Matchups 100% a thing, better hope your boy Davis doesn't get a bad matchup.. and please let me hear how good beau stall barlett is. 149-down is above average is that better? Don't forget Carter ran away... and well, frankly, Kirk says none of this matters anyway....
Hanah Schuster Apple Valley, Minnesota Class of 2025 Committed to Sioux Falls (Women) Projected Weight: 117
Johanna Steinlicht Brookings, South Dakota Class of 2025 Committed to Sioux Falls (Women) Projected Weight: 145
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now