JimmyBT Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Open border is by design. He’s already accomplished more than he wanted. Now he will play the other side on the border while pushing citizenship for all unlawful immigrants. One party onward to communism. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 And people talk about ‘TDS’ 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 3 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said: And people talk about ‘TDS’ Yep they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 https://www.mediaite.com/politics/elon-musk-claims-biden-is-trying-to-get-as-many-illegals-in-the-country-as-possible-so-he-can-make-a-one-party-state/ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husker_Du Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 it's not a crazy concept. if they were to flip texas the US would essentially be a one-party nation. 1 1 TBD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jross Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) Use data and think critically. The Republican party is dead. The US has been on the path of a one-party state and will succeed by 2044. Who is the primary voter for the Republican party? White Christians Who do nonwhites vote for? Democrats Nonwhites provide 40% of the Democratic vote Nonwhites provide less than 20% of the Republican vote How has the population of white people changed in the USA from the original 13 colonies to 2020? What is the nonwhite demographic that is increasing in the USA? How is the apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives computed? The number of people regardless of citizenship. What can the House of Representatives do? Pass bills, spend money, impeach, etc. Are there bills proposing to allow noncitizens to vote? Yes. How long does it take for an illegal immigrant to become a citizen and vote? Depends. It can be immediate with amnesty, while other paths take years. Children of illegals are immediate citizens and can vote on their 18th birthday. Illegal immigrants have multiple children. Does the ordinary public citizen support illegal immigration? No, because it redistributes wealth from them to illegals. Who benefits from illegal immigration? The immigrant and the immigrant's employer of cheap labor. What is the likely reason for the mass increase in illegal immigration from those in power? To stay in power and profit How long will it take for Democrats to gain a permanent voting majority? 20 years. Most likely less. Are white and black citizens losing political influence? Yes, rapidly to Hispanic people. Does Biden want to secure a one-party state? Biden's string pullers do. References Demographics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_racial_and_ethnic_demographics_of_the_United_States#endnote_NatAmPop Laws - https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_permitting_noncitizens_to_vote_in_the_United_States Voters - https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/demographic-profiles-of-republican-and-democratic-voters/ Unraveling the immigration narrative / wealth redistribution - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6zFREz1Lp0&ab_channel=NYUDRI https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/03/21/public-sees-an-america-in-decline-on-many-fronts/ Edited February 4 by jross 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 1 hour ago, jross said: The Republican party is dead. The US has been on the path of a one-party state and will succeed by 2044. Wouldn’t agree the Republican Party is dead. Far from it. I would say however that the current state of the Republican Party is very, very closely related to the behaviors and actions of the Republican Party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 If the Dems end up with control of all three branches and Biden as a lame duck President it’s over. - unlawful immigrants will all be given citizenship - the Supreme Court will be stacked - DC and Puerto Rico will become states - the process of eliminating the electoral college will begin 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 3 hours ago, Husker_Du said: it's not a crazy concept. if they were to flip texas the US would essentially be a one-party nation. Very True. Soros is spending his ass of there. Sadly they may not need Texas if they get all three branches in November. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jross Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) 57 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: Wouldn’t agree the Republican Party is dead. Far from it. I would say however that the current state of the Republican Party is very, very closely related to the behaviors and actions of the Republican Party. The party is not dead yet. Its voters are being rapidly outnumbered. Edited February 4 by jross remove gif 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 That may be. And I would still say that has a lot to do with the behaviors and actions of the Republican Party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle bernard Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 4 hours ago, Husker_Du said: it's not a crazy concept. if they were to flip texas the US would essentially be a one-party nation. that’s not how a one-party nation works. dems could flip texas and the republicans would still control around half the governorships, state houses, congress, etc…. plus a near permanent majority on the supreme court. presidency is only 1/3 of the federal government (and only one party has been winning it while losing the popular vote) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jross Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Not too long now before Congress has the majority and then adds size to the Supreme Court. Democrats are calling for it... its a matter of time. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 (edited) 44 minutes ago, uncle bernard said: that’s not how a one-party nation works. dems could flip texas and the republicans would still control around half the governorships, state houses, congress, etc…. plus a near permanent majority on the supreme court. presidency is only 1/3 of the federal government (and only one party has been winning it while losing the popular vote) Dems considered expanding/ packing the court when they recently had all three branches. Edited February 4 by JimmyBT 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 For reference sake, it was 1869 when the US supreme court went to 9 justices, roughly 38 million people in the country (1/10 the current population) and all kinds of new business law, technology law, industries, etc. etc. etc. An expansion 155 years and 300 million people later doesn't sound like a horrible idea. I'm not saying go 10x or anything close, but.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 3 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said: For reference sake, it was 1869 when the US supreme court went to 9 justices, roughly 38 million people in the country (1/10 the current population) and all kinds of new business law, technology law, industries, etc. etc. etc. An expansion 155 years and 300 million people later doesn't sound like a horrible idea. I'm not saying go 10x or anything close, but.... Are you suggesting that we should have multiple Supreme Courts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 30 minutes ago, Offthemat said: Are you suggesting that we should have multiple Supreme Courts? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 30 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: No Then why would an expansion be a good idea? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 23 minutes ago, Offthemat said: Then why would an expansion be a good idea? 4 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said: For reference sake, it was 1869 when the US supreme court went to 9 justices, roughly 38 million people in the country (1/10 the current population) and all kinds of new business law, technology law, industries, etc. etc. etc. An expansion 155 years and 300 million people later doesn't sound like a horrible idea. I'm not saying go 10x or anything close, but.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 So, just another random thought, void of reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 #RentFree 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 5 Author Share Posted February 5 1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said: #RentFree Ok TDS boy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jross Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 (edited) Would expansion be appropriate in 2025… to handle the caseload? Some are calling for 27 total… https://time.com/5338689/supreme-court-packing/ Sort of depends on who is president. Edited February 5 by jross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRasta Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 10 minutes ago, jross said: Would expansion be appropriate in 2025… to handle the caseload? Some are calling for 27 total… https://time.com/5338689/supreme-court-packing/ Sort of depends on who is president. Not sure we need to go that far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 5 Author Share Posted February 5 (edited) You thru out there that the population is 10x more than the last time it expanded but don’t think it needs to go that far or anything close. What metric do you propose using ? Edited February 5 by JimmyBT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnie Ramirez Walnut, California Class of 2025 Committed to Oklahoma State Projected Weight: 125, 133
Landon Robideau St. Michael-Albertville, Minnesota Class of 2025 Committed to Oklahoma State Projected Weight: 149, 157
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now