Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 1/28/2024 at 1:42 PM, Le duke said:


Ah yes. Travis in Flint. Quite the authority.

Do you realize how dumb you sound?

Now, if I see an actual motion filed by an actual attorney, in an actual court? That would mean something. Right now you’re just pedaling bullshit.

Also, there are multiple attorneys representing Carroll. Which one was it, Travis in Flint? Notice how he doesn’t name anyone? He just throws around a rumor with no basis, so he can’t be fact checked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Expand  

The one with the same last name as the judge: Kaplan.  No relation.  Attacking the messenger on a detail that can be established as factual or not is weak.  That this is now proven to be true, are you going to look to Travis for information in the future?  Even if the relationship should prove to be inconsequential, do you believe the non-disclosure is appropriate?

Edited by Offthemat
  • Fire 1
Posted
  On 1/28/2024 at 11:39 PM, Offthemat said:

The one with the same last name as the judge: Kaplan.  No relation.  Attacking the messenger on a detail that can be established as factual or not is weak.  That this is now proven to be true, are you going to look to Travis for information in the future?  Even if the relationship should prove to be inconsequential, do you believe the non-disclosure is appropriate?

Expand  

https://nypost.com/2024/01/27/news/trump-to-use-judges-conflict-in-83-3m-jury-verdict/

  • Fire 2
Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 12:21 PM, WrestlingRasta said:

I’ve been pretty convinced for some time that Maddow and Tucker were split from the same egg. Some kind of cultural experiement…

Expand  

Did you put this here because you’re running out of room for all the things you’re wrong about?

Posted (edited)
  On 1/30/2024 at 4:27 PM, Offthemat said:

 you’re running out of room for all the things you’re wrong about?

Expand  

Not even close.  I put that there, mainly, because I have been convinced for some time that maddow and Tucker were split from the same egg.

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 5:01 PM, Husker_Du said:

oh those pesky details, Rasta.

y'all are just wishing ill on Trump. b/c no sane, unbiased person would think this was a legit legal process. 

 

Expand  

BWAAAAHAHAAAHAHA

We could get into as seriously long discussion about Trump and details.  But I'll continue to let the legal process play out and we can go from there.   I'm sure you'll keep us well informed of Tucker's thoughts on the matter in the meantime. 

 

 

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 4:57 PM, WrestlingRasta said:

Not even close.  I put that there, mainly, because I have been convinced for some time that maddow and Tucker were split from the same egg.

Expand  

Maybe if you throw it again, because it still didn’t fly.  Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome, and all. 

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 5:06 PM, WrestlingRasta said:

BWAAAAHAHAAAHAHA

We could get into as seriously long discussion about Trump and details.  But I'll continue to let the legal process play out and we can go from there.   I'm sure you'll keep us well informed of Tucker's thoughts on the matter in the meantime. 

 

 

Expand  

what does tucker have to do with it?

  • Fire 1

TBD

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 5:35 PM, Husker_Du said:

what does tucker have to do with it?

Expand  

You chimed in at a time I was comparing Tucker and Maddow, and offthemat had jokes (I think).   
 

I don’t know what your links are they’re not showing anything. So if you’re talking something different….🤷🏻‍♂️

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 5:21 PM, WrestlingRasta said:

You've honestly lost me.   Are you trying to create something for us to spat about?

Expand  

Your comparison of Tucker to Maddow is errant.  Tucker asks questions and let’s you hear the guest’s answers.  You are so triggered by him that you can’t handle it.  It’s TDS, just a different T.  

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 6:06 PM, Offthemat said:

Your comparison of Tucker to Maddow is errant.  Tucker asks questions and let’s you hear the guest’s answers.  You are so triggered by him that you can’t handle it.  It’s TDS, just a different T.  

Expand  

ahhhh. 

Feel better now?  Had to be something getting that out. Enjoy a cold one, you’ve earned it. 

Posted
  On 1/27/2024 at 12:09 AM, mspart said:

How well will the decision hold up in appeal?   If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great.    She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. 

If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen.   If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. 

If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened.   Period. 

mspart

Expand  

Your disdain for assault survivors is showing. 

Don't forget kids that are abused have just as difficult a time remembering details as adults do. Are they still frivolous or something? 

Posted

I'll let the law and our judicial system figure out what is right and wrong in this case and how much and who has to pay.  However, her appearance on MSNBC was NOT a good look and in very bad taste...very cringe worthy and is just another thing for people to not believe her.  Just as Trump saying things during the hearings didn't do him any favors either.  

Posted

hey, soy boy, try to stay on topic.

debate the merits of this case as opposed to 1) just wishing donald trump ill will and 2) moving on to other cases

this entire thread has be some of us saying 'look at the facts'

and the soy posse just hoping shit. 

  • Fire 1

TBD

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 6:46 PM, ThreePointTakedown said:

Your disdain for assault survivors is showing. 

Don't forget kids that are abused have just as difficult a time remembering details as adults do. Are they still frivolous or something? 

Expand  

I have no disdain for assault survivors.   Where did you get that?   I have disdain for declared assault survivors that cannot remember when it happened.   You claim a man sexually assaulted you but cannot remember the year?   Preposterous.  The judge should have thrown it out as frivolous.  

mspart

Posted
  On 1/30/2024 at 10:06 PM, mspart said:

I have no disdain for assault survivors.   Where did you get that?   I have disdain for declared assault survivors that cannot remember when it happened.   You claim a man sexually assaulted you but cannot remember the year?   Preposterous.  The judge should have thrown it out as frivolous.  

mspart

Expand  

Have you met anyone that has survived a situation like that? Better question, what do the overwhelming number of experts in this field say is an average response to surviving a situation like that? 

Hint:  common responses to surviving sexual assault

A big one is embarrassment. Feeling like it was your fault and not wanting anyone to know. Does that seem like something that would make the telling of your story, easy or timely?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...