Jump to content

Brooks, Hidlay give 197 some street credibility

JimmyBT

By JimmyBT
in College Wrestling

 Share

Recommended Posts

JimmyBT Big Brain

JimmyBT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
15 hours ago, hawkguy said:

Good chance if you're the number 5-8 guy at 197 or 174 you have a decent chance of placing at nationals. However if you're number 5-8 at 125 you have to probably beat 3 or 4 guys at your exact skill level to place 

Placing vs. winning it all.  Big difference 

PortaJohn Big Brain

PortaJohn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, JimmyBT said:

Go to California. Plenty of shit in the streets 

as has been explained in another thread as a porta john California is not our market.  Its a free defecator state.  We only work in states regulated with designated defecation zones 

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

JimmyBT Big Brain

JimmyBT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

as has been explained in another thread as a porta john California is not our market.  Its a free defecator state.  We only work in states regulated with designated defecation zones 

But California does regulate designated defection zones 

ionel Big Brain

ionel

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

as has been explained in another thread as a porta john California is not our market.  Its a free defecator state.  We only work in states regulated with designated defecation zones 

C'mon Porta we are a free country, lest you forget the 9th ammendment:

  • The right of the people to be secure in their defecations, and effects, against unreasonable searches and cleanup, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be cleaned up.

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

PortaJohn Big Brain

PortaJohn

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, ionel said:

C'mon Porta we are a free country, lest you forget the 9th ammendment:

  • The right of the people to be secure in their defecations, and effects, against unreasonable searches and cleanup, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be cleaned up.

The 2nd Amendment causes all the confusion and has been a hot debate

*A well regulated Sanitation, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to urinate and defecate, shall not be infringed."

The founding fathers clearly state we need regulation but the feces toting hippies in California disregard this and always start the argument at "the right......"

 

Edited by PortaJohn

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

ionel Big Brain

ionel

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

The 2nd Amendment causes all the confusion and has been a hot debate

*A well regulated Sanitation, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to urinate and defecate, shall not be infringed."

The founding fathers clearly state we need regulation but the feces toting hippies in California disregard this and always start the argument at "the right......"

 

Forgot about the 2nd, thanks. 

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...