Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, red viking said:

Its very different to anybody w very basic math, logic or science background. For example, today was 5 degrees cooler than yesterday. If present trends continue well be below freezing in 10 days. True, technically, but can you see how that is very different from simply saying it will be beloelw freezing in 10 days? It's very basic. 

The Maldives ?

Posted
1 hour ago, red viking said:

But you lied. He didn't say the earth would cool by that amount. Liar!!!

Quote where I said anything about the earth cooling.  You have no credibility.  

.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, red viking said:

 Cav did. 

No.  That scientist did.   I just posted and asked if it came true.  Then you called ionel a liar  

Edited by Caveira
Posted
31 minutes ago, ionel said:

Quote where I said anything about the earth cooling.  You have no credibility.  

 

9 minutes ago, red viking said:

 Cav did. 

You just called me a liar so go back find the post and quote it in your reply documenting the lie.  

.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Caveira said:

No.  That scientist did.   I just posted and asked if it came true.  Then you called ionel a liar  

Whoever claimed that he said earth would cool 11 degrees is a liar. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, red viking said:

Whoever claimed that he said earth would cool 11 degrees is a liar. 

Whoever claimed that a Masters in Geology makes one a scientist is a liar.  Same individual also lied about who was a liar so no credibility whatsoever.  

.

Posted
10 minutes ago, red viking said:

Whoever claimed that he said earth would cool 11 degrees is a liar. 

Scientific predictions are not lies.   They are an incorrect hypothesis based on their research.   

  • Bob 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, ionel said:

Whoever claimed that a Masters in Geology makes one a scientist is a liar.  Same individual also lied about who was a liar so no credibility whatsoever.  

A geologist is a scientist. Omg are you dense. 

Posted
1 hour ago, red viking said:

A geologist is a scientist. Omg are you dense. 

Other than what you did to get  your masters degree, how have you enlarged the understanding in science?   I'm assuming you did research for your Masters, it is possible you went the academic route and got it by taking a bunch of classes.  

mspart

Posted
3 minutes ago, mspart said:

Other than what you did to get  your masters degree, how have you enlarged the understanding in science?   I'm assuming you did research for your Masters, it is possible you went the academic route and got it by taking a bunch of classes.  

mspart

Yes I did a thesis and am a state licensed professional geologist, still working in the field

Posted
2 hours ago, red viking said:

A geologist is a scientist. Omg are you dense. 

 

4 minutes ago, mspart said:

Other than what you did to get  your masters degree, how have you enlarged the understanding in science?   I'm assuming you did research for your Masters, it is possible you went the academic route and got it by taking a bunch of classes.  

mspart

Sure let's hear about those long term research projects he worked on in that year he spent getting a master's degree. 

.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ionel said:

 

Sure let's hear about those long term research projects he worked on in that year he spent getting a master's degree. 

As indicted above, I did a Masters Thesis

Posted
Just now, red viking said:

Correct, I'm working in the applied science field. So you're only a scientist if you did "LONG TERM" research? 

Wait so you’re not qualified to speak about the climate as you’re not a climatologist.  I’m confused 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Wait so you’re not qualified to speak about the climate as you’re not a climatologist.  I’m confused 

I'm not, but I know enough about science in general to defer to those with the most expertise; those with PhDs in climatology. The best authorities are those doing climate research at universities or NOAA. On the other hand, the dumb wingers want to defer to cherry-picked non-climatologists (many of which aren't even scientists at all) that say what they want to hear from Breitbart or Fox News. It's pathetic. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, red viking said:

I'm not, but I know enough about science in general to defer to those with the most expertise; those with PhDs in climatology. The best authorities are those doing climate research at universities or NOAA. On the other hand, the dumb wingers want to defer to cherry-picked non-climatologists (many of which aren't even scientists at all) that say what they want to hear from Breitbart or Fox News. It's pathetic. 

You forgot to answer.  In 1988 they predicted the Maldives would be under water.  I’ve never been there.  Are they?

Posted
6 minutes ago, red viking said:

Correct, I'm working in the applied science field. So you're only a scientist if you did "LONG TERM" research? 

That's correct, PhD required, you don't qualify.  Moreover even if you were a scientist you would have already lost such designation because of your willingness to lie about facts.  You have no credibility sorry.  

.

Posted
Just now, Caveira said:

You forgot to answer.  In 1988 they predicted the Maldives would be under water.  I’ve never been there.  Are they?

Who's "they?" Are you gonna cite another cherry-picked random guy? 

Posted
1 minute ago, red viking said:

Who's "they?" Are you gonna cite another cherry-picked random guy? 

Scientists.   Climatologists.   Alarmists.   People in desperate need to keep funding their research.  Answer the question ?

Posted
Just now, Caveira said:

Scientists.   Climatologists.   Alarmists.   People in desperate need to keep funding their research.  Answer the question ?

I need context. I'm not aware of this claim, which was obviously not mainstream (like the current claims that man is causing global warming). Who said it, what was their qualifications and what was the exact quote because you wingers constantly take things out of context. 

Posted

Being an expert scientist and all, can you tell me what good a climatologist has ever done for anybody?  I mean, with all the warnings of oceans rising, highly intelligent people like Obama is still buying and building waterfront properties, evidently not paying any attention to what the climatologists say, so what good are they?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...