Jump to content

Ferrari v Brooks at 197


Fletcher

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, PortaJohn said:

AJ is  under 6' tall with the wingspan of a midget.  He's undersized.  Go watch his matches if you dont believe me

Now you are making me come off as a big AJ (which I am not). Are we talking about the same guy? MrFastTwitch? He was a big 197 and actually has a very long wingspan...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gus said:

Now you are making me come off as a big AJ (which I am not). Are we talking about the same guy? MrFastTwitch? He was a big 197 and actually has a very long wingspan...

Yes.  Same guy.  And no he's not a big 197 pounder and where did this imaginary long wingspan come from?  or are you just trolling me!  AJ is not that big of a person.  Anyone who has been around him can verify this

Edited by PortaJohn

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PortaJohn said:

Yes.  Same guy.  And no he's not a big 197 pounder and where did this imaginary long wingspan come from?  or are you just trolling me!  AJ is not that big of a person.  Anyone who has been around him can verify this

Are you just trolling me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

spacer.png

Looks like Dean and Carter are hoisting Aaron off of the ground to inflate his height for the pic. Probably for his Christian mingle dating profile picture so he can meet the 6' requirement of most ladies, if I had to guess. 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

I'd lay a bet that common opponent, total points scored, bonus point rate are all bad metrics in determining the victor between two elite opponents that have never wrestled.  My fellow PSU fanatics made that same terrible mistake when I kept telling them Dake was going to beat Taylor.  I know points scored are "sexy" but they're too overvalued  

Ok, then what would you use when discussing who would win?  It may not be a great metric, but it's more solid than pure speculation since they've never wrestled.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, KCMO2 said:

Ok, then what would you use when discussing who would win?  It may not be a great metric, but it's more solid than pure speculation since they've never wrestled.

I personally use the eye test and then delete the posts where I'm completely wrong like any self respecting poster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, KCMO2 said:

Ok, then what would you use when discussing who would win?  It may not be a great metric, but it's more solid than pure speculation since they've never wrestled.

I predict using strengths and weaknesses both opponents have and how they compare to each other's style.   Then which wrestler has the upper hand in exposing his opponents weakness.  I have never used a common opponent as a barometer.  I personally believe it's unreliable 

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...