All Activity

Yeah...I guess maybe if you're a 70-year-old judge. The problem is, the right picked up the word "woke" and like they do with so much, the bastardized it and now it has no meaning.

Ooh...not it's "only" 10-15 articles... But why isn't "the media" covering this...story that's a month old that they wrote 10-15-20 articles about depending on which post you're just making things up in... So...ALL these articles written...TWENTY of them! ...but the media doesn't care! Yeah...you're not just full of pre-programmed talking points

LMFAO...I'm sorry, you were saying Caveira?

Can you please translate for the dummies in the back (me)

Ok... cool. So...STILL, the sequence of events PER THE TRUMP administration. As of 2018, Iran was still in compliance with the agreement. In March of 2025, Tulsi Gabbard said in March 2025(So the SECOND Trump administration) that they were not buliding a Nuclear Weapon(though this is moot as it's 7 years after the US pulled out of the agreement). So what do I think Iranian Nuclear Scientists are doing? Yeah...playing checkers. Or you can READ what I've actually written repeatedly which is was the 1st Trump administration that said they'd been adhering to the terms of the agreement in 2018. The US pulled out of the agreement FIRST. Once they pulled out, of COURSE the other side is not going to hold up their side of the agreement... since they're no-longer-an-agreement! LOL...how is this difficult for you to understand? So bottom line, if YOU want to argue that they were really violating the agreement before the United States pulled out, you need to make the case that the Trump administration was lying in 2018.

Read this slowly the elected official is entitled to jack shyte nothing. His ask is bubkus. The police can lie to him all day and twice on Sunday. The only person that matters is the person named in the warrant. read it twice before posting. Have a cheese sandwich. Read it one more time. Then post your reaction. Put a shyte emoji on this response when you’re done with the sandwich. Use artisan cheese. It’s better.

Yeah, but then they're lying by saying they have one in their pocket. He won't post it as it'll be some poll where they only or primarily only poll conservatives. It's a joke. And that's even high for the right, so probably a poll from...Florida or Texas only.

Everything Gable does rubs somebody wrong. Is there something he could do to give everyone a good rub?

Dude, I pointed out that you were full of crap about 62% wanting evey illegal alien deported and you responded with a cheese sandwich and a Senator. We're past the comptroller, we have been for a while. I posted that you need to have a warrant for a Mist arrest. YOU posted that they need to present the warrant. I posted they lied about the type of warrant they have. I posted links showing nowhere NEAR 62% want all illegal immigrants deported and then pointed out the disaster that'd cause the economy(Which is why Trump is ALREADY doing his typical TACO and talking about not deporting those who are working here. But you think I'm not arguing facts! LOL...nope. I argued them and then just concluded that you no longer seem to care about the unchecked Federal Authority that the conservatives have CLAIMED to care about for...decades upon decades.

UNOS won't place him for transplant in this condition.

Man. It’s 66 now lol https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/majority-americans-support-deporting-immigrants-who-are-us-illegally

He'll be a gamer!

My understanding is that technically they do only need an “administrative warrant,” but apparently that’s just something ICE creates.

what about atomel

Stop debating facts and resort to name calling when you realize you aren’t right. booooot lickers!!!!!!!! i thought y’all wanted due process. Now your getting it and booooooottttttt licker lol.

Link?

So... again, they DO need to show the illegal alien, they didn't, they lied about having one, they had an administrative warrant. Thank you for accidentally proving that ICE doesn't have to follow any laws at this point.

We are all waiting for @CornCob_Du to put together the Big Board and @Wrestleknowalittlebit to post some colorful graphs and charts.

LOL...I know exactly what you're saying. You're now licking the boots of federal agents and don't think they should even provide a warrant for a MISTEMEANOR!! You think I'm emotionally invested in this one incident and you're just not smart enough to understand it's the abuse of power. The lying about having a warrant, claiming they have one but refusing to show it. As I said, I hope they don't step in any dog crap when you're licking their boots. Now...all done with this one. Just showing ONCE AGAIN where the right is just comically hypocritical.

“Cheese Sandwich” Scenario & Arrest Law Let’s say federal officers are arresting “illegal alien A” and a local senator storms in, demanding to see the warrant. The officers wave a literal cheese sandwich at him and say, “Here—here’s your warrant!” Meanwhile, they proceed to arrest “illegal alien A”, who actually is named in the real warrant. How does the law view that? Who has the right to the warrant? Only the person named in the warrant (here, “illegal alien A”) has the legal right to: Be informed of the existence of a warrant and the offense, and See the physical warrant when requested A random bystander—even a senator—has no legal standing to demand or view it . Lying to the senator / waving a cheese sandwich The warrant belongs to Illegal alien A; it doesn’t need to be shown to anyone else. Officers aren’t obliged to satisfy the senator’s demand, nor validate his demand with anything real. Waving a cheese sandwich instead of a warrant is not legally required or disallowed—but it plays no role in complying with the law. Could that be illegal? Officers can deceive bystanders — but twisting the truth about having a warrant or to manipulate consent can lead to Fourth Amendment violations (e.g., Bumper v. North Carolina, Hadley v. Williams) Here, they aren’t lying to person A—they’re simply not responding to the senator’s non-existent legal right. Is there any potential harm? The arrest itself is lawful so long as the real warrant is valid and person A is properly informed . Deceiving the senator doesn’t void the arrest or its legality. However, if they had used the sandwich trick to enter a home or gain consent, that could trigger suppression of evidence—especially if it was used to bypass legal protections .

More made up nonsense... And he did nothing wrong so there was nothing to charge him with. Your preferences are moot. You also have to be a special brand of stupid to want that and to not understand what that'd do to the economy. That'd have a 1.5-3 TRILLION dollar impact to the economy in one year if you JUST could Thanos your way and snap your fingers and get rid of every undocumented immigrant. I told you idiots what would happen. Trump would claim victory and he'd start giving out work exemptions. I said this a couple months ago when Nebraska was talking about how much their agriculture industry was hurting due to these policies. The prices of produce, manufacturing... Even still, the 62% is a ridiculous number.

It says above. Several times. They’re not required to show some random dude anything. They could have waved a cheese sandwich in his face. I don’t think that it is relevant.

ICE did not present a judicial warrant, though an agent vaguely waved a paper and claimed they had it — in reality it was likely an administrative warrant politifact.com. So...they lied. They didn't have it "in their pocket." And THAT'S why the Governor had the magical ability to get Pam Bondi, the US AG to "drop the charges," where she had...no actual authority.

62% of all Americans want every single illegal alien deported. Seems like you can’t handle it happening And want to resist every single attempt. i would have preferred that rando elected guy get charged too. That would be the right thing to do imo.